SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

TOGETHER:

imelda avatar
12 diapositives · 271 Views · Aug 29, 2014

TOGETHER:. A COLLABORATIVE APPROACH. Lay Out. Main Features and Key Aspects Examples of Good Practices Challenges Solutions. MAIN FEATURES AND KEY ASPECTS. National consultative processes Community structures representation

TOGETHER: - slide 1
01 / 12TOGETHER:
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

TOGETHER:
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. TOGETHER: A COLLABORATIVE APPROACH

  2. Lay Out • Main Features and Key Aspects • Examples of Good Practices • Challenges • Solutions

  3. MAIN FEATURES AND KEY ASPECTS • National consultative processes • Community structures representation • Multi-sectoral task force (CSOs, UN, Donors, Govt Ministries etc) • Joint assessments • District disaster management committees which is multi-sectoral • Food security coordination which is also multi sectoral with various indicators, joint report which is submitted to OPM

  4. Main Features Cont’d: • NGO support to OPM through conducting Vulnerability Capacity Assessments done by humanitarian organisations (OXFAM 12 districts in 2008, Uganda Red Cross 2007 looking at 22 districts to a set up for mapping. High involvement and participation in communities • Government partnership with NGOs • Budgeting process starts from communities (community meetings, parish development plans which feed into district development plans which are also a focal • Baseline surveys and community needs assessments before community interventions using their scorecards etc • Evidence-based advocacy • Institutional framework and Collaborative agreements are in place

  5. EXAMPLES OF GOOD PRACTICE • Community Seed banking and food storage models (community committees; benefits include access to appropriate inputs and technology (drought resistant seed), early warning information, access to quality seed.Uganda • L.Victoria initiative (Red Cross) benefits: all inclusive • Learning Journeys (exchange visits) benefits: cross-learning across East Africa • Nile Basin Initiative (10 countries: shared activities across countries; learning from best practices; transboundary learning; cross-border beach management committees sharing info and keeping water clean • Self Help activities (youth, women etc) benefits; ‘merry go round’, community safety nets-Kenya

  6. CHALLENGES • National collaboration not trickling down to the community level from Govt but humanitarian organisations do consult with communities • Disasters are narrow; only limited to famine , floods ,etcs • Kenya (Special Program Ministry) is little known; don’t know about food insecurity, alleviation of hunger • Collaborative agreements are not adhered to due to multiplicity (e.g of double doors as fire escape but second day is locked, in schools, approvals • ‘Forgotten persons’, Indegenous people, elderly, disabled, youth, gender; hiv affected persons etc not consulted and yet generation with local knowledge

  7. CHALLENGES Cont’d: • Rural-urban migration, institutions need to be devolved to go down to community; • Govt-NGO struggles; political issues • Need for community bye-laws and ordinances

  8. CHALLENGES Cont’d: • Different levels of understanding of approaches; modes of implementation are different etc amongst Government, civil society, UN etc due to limited sharing of information • Vision and paradigm shift of DRR not yet concretised across all sectors.

  9. CHALLENGES Cont’d: • Dependency syndrome • Media motivation low eg journalists not receiving sponsors for environmental /Disaster prevention (corporates not motivated) PANOS sponsoring Environmental Journalism Association • Documentation of DRR limited e.g on Traditional Institutional memory; is it documented?, eg early warning practices etc

  10. SOLUTIONS Cont’d: • Strengthen Institutional capacity building at all levels • Be very selective, ability to demonstrate skills in their work • Government should allocate funds for environmental Media Reporting • Reporting needs to be harmonised and standardized viz baselines, targets, achievements, funding, challenges • Training in Transformative leadership for Attitudinal change • Govt should educate and involve farmers for effective participation • Develop SOP that can be used in disaster response

  11. SOLUTIONS Cont’d: • Refine Multi-sectoral and multi-disciplinary approach be implemented at community level eg fisher folk, farmers, etc • Strengthen Public Private Partnerships • Capacity building trainings need to be harmonised, targeting needs to be changed

  12. THANK YOU! Comments/Queries welcome