1 / 13

GLD IR optimization and background study

Geant4-based full simulation for anti-DID optimization in GLD detector with 3T solenoid field. Study includes VTX and TPC hits monitoring, solenoid fields, and forward calorimeter inner radius optimization. Preliminary results show promising reduction in background hits and ongoing study on FCAL inner radius optimization.

janesnyder
Télécharger la présentation

GLD IR optimization and background study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GLD IR optimization and background study H.Fujishima, Saga-U ILCWS2007, Beijin 5 February 2007

  2. Motivation • Geant4 based full simulation (Jupiter) • Anti-DID optimization in GLD • Background hits in GLD detector with 3T solenoid field added anti-DID. • IR optimization (FCAL inner radius)

  3. IR Design Hole radius FCAL inner radius Beam crossing angle: 14mrad

  4. Downstream IP Upstream Anti-DID Field Solenoid with anti-DID: Bz = 3T, Bx_serpentine Andrei’s anti-DID data: (z,Bz,Br,Bx_serpentine) Br_x = r/d*Br*cos(theta) Br_y = r/d*Br*sin(theta) d = z*theta Anti-DID field Solenoid with anti-DID, X-Z plane

  5. Anti-DID Optimization 1.2 times Andrei’s data is the best pass efficiency. Pair background cluster exits extraction hole. %

  6. Background hits with anti-DID CAIN is used to generate pair background. Beam parameter is nominal at center of mass energy 500 GeV. Plain solenoid: 10 bunches Solenoid with anti-DID: 8 bunches Background hits are monitored by VTX and TPC. They are simply digitized.

  7. VTX map Hits in VTX VTX in GLD has 6 layers. It consists of the 5 micron pixel charge coupled device. The signal of each 1 train is read, and 1 incident particle sound 4 pads on the average. So tolerance (1% occupancy) is 1.0*10^4 hits/cm^2/train. tolerance Hits of solenoid field added anti-DID became half compared with it of plain solenoid. Do VTX hits include much backscatter? I have to study the origin of VTX hits.

  8. Hits in TPC 1 hit in TPC consists of 5 pads (1mm*6mm) * 5 buckets (50nsec). Tolerance of TPC (0.5% occupancy) is 5*10^5 hits/50micro second. Hits of solenoid field added anti-DID is about 1/3 compared with it of plain solenoid. It is because backscatter decreased. tolerance

  9. IR Optimization FCAL inner radius for TPC background hits. Hole radius of extraction to decrease backscattering. Radius of beam pipe @VTX Hole radius FCAL inner radius

  10. FCAL Inner Radius Optimization The purpose is to optimize forward calorimeter (FCAL) inner radius to decrease TPC background. Default value of FCAL inner radius was determined by simple head on geometry. But… we have to verify it by full simulation. FCAL CH2Mask BCAL Support Tube FCAL Inner Radius

  11. Treatment of TPC hits There are continuous hits in the z direction. These are made by 1 incident particle. Estimation by the number of incidence particle. About 3 bunches are used.

  12. Preliminary Result Results are written by 4 kinds of radiuses. 82 mm is standard. No dependency is seen. Statistics is not enough because of necessity a lot of time.

  13. Summary • Anti-DID field is optimized.→ Background hits are reduced. • IR optimization has been started.FCAL inner radius is under study now.

More Related