1 / 45

Complex Predicates

Universität Potsdam Institut für Linguistik SS06: Hindi-Urdu Syntax Shravan Vasishth Presented by Juliane Böhme. Complex Predicates. 1.Part : Comparing data complex predicate vs. embedded infinitive 2.Part : Butt‘s Analysis. Complex Predicates. Constructions in focus Agreement

jerod
Télécharger la présentation

Complex Predicates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Universität Potsdam Institut für Linguistik SS06: Hindi-Urdu Syntax Shravan Vasishth Presented by Juliane Böhme Complex Predicates

  2. 1.Part: Comparing data complex predicate vs. embedded infinitive 2.Part: Butt‘s Analysis

  3. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Permissive: (1) Complex predicate

  4. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Tell Construction: (2) Not a complex predicate

  5. Tests on constituents: Agreement -Scrambling Anaphora -Negation Control -Coordination

  6. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Agreement Simple structure: (3) • Missing Nom.  Default

  7. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Embedded structure: (4) • Missing Nom. in matrix clause  Default

  8. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Tell construction: (5) • behaves like embedded structure  no complexe predicate

  9. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Permissive: (6) • behaves like simple structure  complexe predicate

  10. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Control Participial adverbials: (7)

  11. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Permissive: (8) • like a simple sentence

  12. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Tell construction: (9) • two controllers possible  embedded construction

  13. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Anaphora Reflexive: Reflexive apnaa: always subject antecedent (10)

  14. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Pronominal Pronominal us-kaa: never subject antecendent (11)

  15. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Pronominal: Permissive (12) • like simple sentence

  16. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Reflexive: Permissive (13) • like simple sentence

  17. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Reflexive: Tell construction (14) • Matrix subject is not antecedent  Reflexive in a different domain

  18. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Pronominal: Tell construction (15) • Matrix subject may be antecedent as well as iObj  Reflexive in a different domain

  19. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Scrambling Simple structure: • Scrambling Possibilities: • Any direct daughter of S can scramble freely (see handout (16)) • No scrambling out of constituents or within constituents (see handout (17))

  20. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Tell construction: (18)

  21. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Tell construction: • unexpected: (19)

  22. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Tell construction: (20) • two possible constituents: 1. the two predicates or 2. The infinitiv predicate

  23. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Permissive: (21) • expected

  24. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Permissive: • unexpected (22)

  25. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Permissive: (23)

  26. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Negation Simple structure: • Sentential negation applies left within a V‘ (24)

  27. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Tell construction: • expected (25)

  28. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Permissive: (26) • unexpected

  29. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Coordination Simple structure: • Constituents can be coordinated • something that can coordinate does not have to be a constituent (27)

  30. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Simple structure: (28)

  31. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Tell construction: • expected (29)

  32. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Tell construction: • unexpected (30)

  33. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Permissive: • unexpected (31)

  34. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Permissive: • expected (32)

  35. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Problem: • can be distinguished by binding and agreement facts • can not be distinguished by phrase structure

  36. Analysis in LFG

  37. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis Analysis Analysis in LFG: • Seperate Representation of Information • Similarities on c-structure (phrase structure) and a-structure • Differences on f-structure (grammatical function)

  38. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis F-Structure: Flat f-structure permissive: SUBJ [PRED ‚Anjum‘] OBJgo [PRED ‚Saddaf‘] PRED ‚let write‘ < __, __, __ >‘ OBJ [PRED ‚note‘]

  39. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis F-Structure: Complex f-structure: Tell Construction SUBJ [PRED ‚Anjum‘] OBJgo [PRED ‚Saddaf‘] PRED ‚say <__, __, __ >‘ PRED ‚write <__, __ >‘ XCOMP SUBJ [ ] OBJ [PRED ‚note‘ ]

  40. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis C-Structure: Permissive

  41. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis C-Structure: Tell Construction

  42. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis A-Structure: • de ,let‘ contains transparent Event  fusion of argument structures • kah ‚say‘ contains non-transparent Event  no fusion (f-structure  embedded argument structure)  Both: complex a-structure

  43. Complex Predicates • Constructions in focus • Agreement • Control • Anaphora • Scrambling • Negation • Coordination • Analysis • Distinction only on f-structure • Characterization of a complex Predicate: A complex a-structure maps onto a flat f-structure. While realization of c-structure may but doesn‘t have to be complex.

  44. Complex Predicates Literature: Butt, Miriam. (1994). Complex Predicate Scrambling in Urdu. In: Miriam Butt, Tracy Holloway, Gillian Ramchand, (eds.). Theoretical Perspectives on Word Order in South Asian Languages. CSLI Publications.67-90

  45. Thank you for listening

More Related