1 / 15

GOVT S-1113 Meeting 4

GOVT S-1113 Meeting 4. July 4 th and Democracy in the USA. The democratic path of the USA violates much of what we’ve learned in class so far. How to reconcile this? --Gradualism --Changing conditions --Great ( Wo )Man Theory. Ways of organizing the readings:. Structural

jonco
Télécharger la présentation

GOVT S-1113 Meeting 4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GOVT S-1113Meeting 4

  2. July 4th and Democracy in the USA The democratic path of the USA violates much of what we’ve learned in class so far. How to reconcile this? --Gradualism --Changing conditions --Great (Wo)Man Theory

  3. Ways of organizing the readings: • Structural • Agent-centric • Combined approaches

  4. Inglehart & Welzel Key points: • Modernizationdemocracy (via middle class) • Social and cultural change is path-dependent • Modernization need not be “Westernization” • Values matter (industrial and post-industrial)

  5. Acemoglu & Robinson Key Points: • Many things matter; economics matter most • Politics is inherently conflictual/class-based • Institutions matter due to t and t+1 problem • Elite options (de jure and de facto power)

  6. Huber, Rueschemeyerand Stephens Three relevant “power clusters”: • Relative class power and its balance • Role of the state • Impact of transnational power structures

  7. Przeworski & Limongi Key Points: • Endogenous vs. exogenous effects • Level of economic development matters • Impact for democratization not same as for maintaining democracy • Rapid growth not destabilizing • Downturns are (potentially) destabilizing

  8. Boix and Stokes Key points: • Challenge refutation of endogenous democratization on three grounds: • Small-n problem • Sample selection • Omitted variable bias

  9. Freedom in the World, 2010

  10. Reuveny & Li Key points: Reuveny & Li attempt to synthesize two separate literatures (economic globalization & democratic peformance) FINDINGS: • Higher level democracy reduces inequality (use Polity III data to measure democracy) • Trade openness=greater equitability • FDI=lower equitability • Foreign capital inflows (not FDI)= no effect

  11. Boix! Again!!! Key points: • Economic development helps democratization and stabilizes democracy (the latter effect not linear) • Domestic effects of economic development are also mediated by structure of international system

  12. Haggard & Kaufman Key points: • Examine 1980-2000, meaning 3rd wave only, using qualitative approach • Find inequality contestation (distributive-conflict model like Acemoglu & Robinson) does not apply well in 3rd wave to predict democratization • Offer alternate suggestions to account for this, including social movement theory

  13. Wood Key points: • 1) Need to disaggregate types of elites and their interests • 2) Distinct forms of mobilization threaten specific types of regimes • 3) Concrete economic interests are endogenous to trajectory of conflict

More Related