1.72k likes | 1.96k Vues
Planet Earth. We Have a Problem. Feedback Dynamics & the Acceleration of Climate Change. 2006 – 6.5 Billion. 1492 – 500 Million. 2050 – 9.1 Billion. 1945 – 2.3 Billion. 1776 – 1 Billion. Population Growth Throughout History. World Population. 9. 8. 7. 6. 5. Billions. 4. 3.
E N D
Planet Earth We Have a Problem
2006 – 6.5 Billion 1492 – 500 Million 2050 – 9.1 Billion 1945 – 2.3 Billion 1776 – 1 Billion Population Growth Throughout History World Population 9 8 7 6 5 Billions 4 3 2 1 First Modern Humans 0 160,000 B.C. 100,000 B.C. 10,000 B.C. 7,000 B.C. 6,000 B.C. 5,000 B.C. 4,000 B.C. 3,000 B.C. 2,000 B.C. 1,000 B.C. 1 A.D. 1,000 A.D. 2,000 A.D. 2,150 A.D. Source: United Nations
Atmospheric Carbon-dioxide
Increase in GHG concentration raises efficiency of insulating envelope, reducing net global radiation
Increase in GHG concentration raises efficiency of insulating envelope, reducing net global radiation
Surface temperature rises, driven by retained solar energy
until resultant radiation recovers to establish a new thermal equilibrium
Except that we are accelerating the accumulation of GHGs.
Except that we are accelerating the accumulation of GHGs.
Except that we are accelerating the accumulation of GHGs, and feedbacks are also pushing the system even further from balance
Except that we are accelerating the accumulation of GHGs, and feedbacks are also pushing the system even further from balance
Spatial Sink Geo- thermal energy Temperature Solar energy Radiative Forcing Contrails & Aerosols Cloud Effects Albedo Effect Other GHGs Concentration Carbon Dioxide Concentration Methane Concentration Water Vapour Concentration
Spatial Sink Geo- thermal energy Temperature Solar energy F.G F.R Radiative Forcing F.3 F.4 Contrails & Aerosols F.2 F.5 Cloud Effects Albedo Effect F.1 F.6 Other GHGs Concentration Carbon Dioxide Concentration Methane Concentration Water Vapour Concentration
Spatial Sink Geo- thermal energy Temperature Solar energy F.G F.R Radiative Forcing F.3 F.4 Contrails & Aerosols F.2 F.5 Cloud Effects Albedo Effect F.1 F.6 Other GHGs Concentration Carbon Dioxide Concentration Methane Concentration Water Vapour Concentration
Spatial Sink Geo- thermal energy Temperature Solar energy F.G F.R Radiative Forcing F.3 F.4 Contrails & Aerosols F.2 F.5 Cloud Effects Albedo Effect F.1 F.6 Other GHGs Concentration Carbon Dioxide Concentration Methane Concentration Water Vapour Concentration
Spatial Sink Geo- thermal energy Temperature Solar energy F.G F.R Thermal Inertia F.3 F.4 Radiative Forcing Contrails & Aerosols F.2 F.5 Cloud Effects Albedo Effect F.1 F.6 Other GHGs Concentration Carbon Dioxide Concentration Methane Concentration Water Vapour Concentration
Spatial Sink Geo- thermal energy Temperature Solar energy F.G F.R F.Ti F.3 F.4 Thermal Inertia Radiative Forcing Contrails & Aerosols F.2 F.5 Cloud Effects Albedo Effect F.1 F.6 Other GHGs Concentration Carbon Dioxide Concentration Methane Concentration Water Vapour Concentration
Most of the systems known to affect Climate Change are now in net positive feedback. Each feedback mechanism accelerates its own specific process. As a whole, the complex adaptive feedback system consists of an interactive set of mutually reinforcing subsystems.
This second order feedback system therefore accelerates the rate of Climate Change
Dennis Bushnell, Chief Scientist, NASA Langley Research Center 12th January 2007
James Hansen, Director, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. 18th February 2007
Beyond the Tipping Point Towards the Anthropocene Extinction Event
“Tipping Point”or Bifurcation Between Two Attractor Basins
Introducing the Concept of “Critical Threshold”
“Critical Threshold” the point beyond which the power of positive feedback overwhelms the capacity for human intervention
“Critical Threshold” the point towards which the cost of climate stabilisation escalates asymptotically towards infinity
Cost of Climate Stabilisation
We are now in the early stages of runaway Climate Change. There does not appear to be any naturally occurring negative feedback process in place to contain its effects.
Strategically we have to generate a negative feedback intervention of sufficient power to overcome the now active positive feedback process.
Then maintain its effectiveness during the period while temperature-driven feedback continues to be active.
Climate Stabilisation Strategic Imperative for Tomorrow’s World
Radiative Forcing Or Global Heating The Gap between Energy received from the Sun and Energy radiated back into space from the Earth
Accelerating Global Heating +ve Global Heating 0 Thermal Equilibrium -ve Time Radiative Forcing -
480 Radiative Forcing 460 440 2.5 420 400 380 380 3.6 2007 2007
480 Radiative Forcing 460 440 2.5 420 400 380 380 3.6 2007 2007 2007
480 Radiative Forcing 460 440 2.5 420 400 380 380 3.6 + CO2e 2007 2007 2007
480 Radiative Forcing 460 3.6 440 + H2Ovap 2.5 420 400 380 + CO2e 380 2007 2007 2007
480 Radiative Forcing + Albedo-change? 460 3.6 440 + H2Ovap 2.5 420 400 380 + CO2e 380 2007 2007 2007
Radiative Forcing Or Global Heating Value of about 4 watts per square metre
Radiative Forcing Or Global Heating Value of about 4 watts per square metre Is reduced by 1 w.m-2 for Global Dimming