1 / 5

Space Charge Neutralization

Space Charge Neutralization. Implications re pulsing or chopping the beam. TRIUMF 500 MeV cyclotron. 300 keV, < 1 mA injected beam (V sc < 1.2 volts) Space charge effect is small except near inflector We use all electrostatic optics: neutralization is very small.

kalei
Télécharger la présentation

Space Charge Neutralization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Space Charge Neutralization Implications re pulsing or chopping the beam

  2. TRIUMF 500 MeV cyclotron • 300 keV, < 1 mA injected beam (Vsc < 1.2 volts) • Space charge effect is small except near inflector • We use all electrostatic optics: neutralization is very small. • This allows us to use a 1 kHz pulser. It has 3 functions: • For tuning at peak intensity without using dangerous average intensities. • To run at varying intensity without changing the tune. • To always have a 1 kHz component in the beam so that its intensity can be monitored (with a magnetic core transformer) online, for interlock protection against unexpected losses.

  3. CIAE 100 MeV cyclotron • Injected beam is 40 keV, few mA. (Vsc ~ 25 volts) • Neutralization is unavoidable and extremely beneficial: • Without it, it is very hard to keep beam focused. At 8 mA, a 4 mm diameter beam doubles in size with a drift of 12 cm. • With it, beam optics is insensitive to beam intensity. This helps for tuning up • But: need to make sure all components visible to beam are within about 0.25 volt of ground (to give 99% neut), so no electrostatic optics allowed at all. • And: Neutralization time is on order of 100 us at 1.e-6 Torr, so if pulser is used, shortest pulses must be long compared with this time. E.g. 1% duty needs < 10 Hz. For pulses >> 1 kHz, it is the same as turning neutralization off. • Chopping in MHz region cannot be done in injection line, except with a loss of about a factor of 100 avg. intensity.

  4. Effect of pulsing beam at 12 keV, 1 mA. Upper trace is current measured on aperture, lower is voltage applied to deflection plates. Horizontal is time, 50 us/div. From EPAC88, p.949

  5. An alternative is to design with no neutralization. This requires clearing electrodes all along injection line, so it is more convenient to simply use electrostatic optics. • Need quadrupole separation of about 10 cm to retain option of ~1 mA 100 MeV operation. • With ~2 mA from source, and large bunching effect, this is essentially like the Cyclone 30 design: 10 cm quad separation needed only near inflector. • With ~10 mA from source, don’t need bunching, but need very many quadrupoles. • With no neutralization, there is no cancellation of higher order space charge forces, so beam will not inject as cleanly. Not guaranteed to work at ~1 mA cw or 100 uA pulsed: may have to drop down by some factor.

More Related