1 / 8

Afterlife Workshop

Afterlife Workshop. A Philosophical Journey. Objective. SWBAT to revise and strengthen their writing through a writing workshop to enhance the validity and effectiveness of their use of source material to support their philosophy on different topics. . Labeling.

kirk
Télécharger la présentation

Afterlife Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Afterlife Workshop A Philosophical Journey

  2. Objective • SWBAT to revise and strengthen their writing through a writing workshop to enhance the validity and effectiveness of their use of source material to support their philosophy on different topics.

  3. Labeling • Make a key at the top of the person’s paper using your highlighters • Sample: • Green=Statement • Pink=Proof • Yellow=Commentary • Label the topic sentence • Label the transition at the end • Highlight statement, proof, and commentary using your key

  4. Evaluate Your Claim • Does it clearly state your position on whether there is something after death? EVALUATE YOUR PROOF • Do you establish that your statement is indeed evident in the reliable source material you used? • Do you have direct quotes from the original source(s), NOT the handouts or powerpoint? EVALUATE YOUR COMMENTARY • Do you address the WHY of your statement? In addition to what your sources indicated, what has led YOU specifically to accept this as truth? Include explanation, anecdotes, etc. • Do you include a specific COMPARISON to your cited philosopher or thinker? • Do you include a specific CONTRAST to your cited philosopher or thinker?

  5. Evaluate Connections • Draw a line between the first quote’s commentary and the claim. Evaluate if you have made this connection in your commentary. • If yes, draw a check mark next to the line • If no, draw and “x” on the line. • Repeat with your second (and third, etc) quote • Only draw a check mark if the connection is clear and explicit. I should not need to take a leap of faith to get where you are going.

  6. Peer OR Self-Evaluation • Re-read your paragraph(s) and your reviewers comments • If you are reading SOMEONE ELSE’S PAPER, can you tell what he/she believes and why? • If you are reading YOUR OWN PAPER, try to pull back and see it with fresh eyes. From an outsider’s point of view, can you tell what he/she believes and why?

  7. SELF-EVALUATION • Now that you have gone through the workshop, ask yourself, “How well did I do? What can I do better?” • Using the rubric, indicate honestly how well written you believe your paragraph was. • Next to the score, make notes of what you need to revise in order to strengthen it • Turn in your afterlife section with the rubric stapled on top

  8. HOMEWORK: • Compare and Contrast-Nature vs. Nurture. • Fold your paper in half long ways. • Nature on the left; Nurture on the right • Research these two belief systems • Take detailed notes on both • Include opposition viewpoints • Don’t forget to ANNOTATE***

More Related