1 / 35

Robots will required to work in dirty, dangerous & dull environments

Truly autonomous systems will be required to generate and manage their own energy budget [Holland98, Pfeifer96] This is true of single robots as well as a group of distributed autonomous robots. Robots will required to work in dirty, dangerous & dull environments

leigh
Télécharger la présentation

Robots will required to work in dirty, dangerous & dull environments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Truly autonomous systems will be required to generate and manage their own energy budget [Holland98, Pfeifer96] • This is true of single robots as well as a group of distributed autonomous robots.

  2. Robots will required to work in dirty, dangerous & dull environments • Robots will do things you don’t want to do - in a place you don’t want to be - at a time you don’t want to or cant be there. • Robots will need to generate their energy from the environment.

  3. SolarBots

  4. Collective Energy Collection

  5. Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCs) and Autonomous Robots Chris Melhuish, John Greenman & Ioannis Ieropoulos

  6. Fuel cells • An electrochemical transducer which converts chemical energy to electrical energy. • Fuel cells consist of anode (-ve) and cathode (+ve) electrodes. • These are separated by a solid electrolyte and a catalyst is used (anode) to speed up the chemical reactions.

  7. MFCs • A bio-electrochemical transducer which converts biochemical energy to electricity • In place of the solid electrolyte there is a proton exchange membrane • The catalyst is the bacterial culture

  8. MFC history • Luigi Galvani (18th century) observed electricity in the legs of a frog (animal electricity). • Prof. Potter (1910) introduced the first MFC by using E. coli and platinum. • Cohen (Cambridge, 1931) revived Potter’s MFC after it was illustrated how enzymes oxidise food. • Bennetto (1980s) developed an analytical model for the MFC.

  9. Analytical MFC model Proton exchange membrane Anode Cathode

  10. MFC categorisation • Generation I (Gen-I) • Synthetic mediator based (Bennetto et al 1980’s) • Generation II (Gen-II) • Natural mediator based (Habermann et al 1991) • Generation III (Gen-III) • Anodophillic – no mediator (Lovley et al 2003) • Generation ? (Gen-?) • Anodophillic(?) – natural mediator(?) (Habermann et al 1991)

  11. Gen-I

  12. Ecobot I

  13. Ecobot I - phototaxis

  14. Gen-II

  15. Gen-II natural mediator • SO4 found in wastewater • No manual replenishment or recycling necessary • H2S is a natural metabolite of the dominant species D. desulfuricans • H2S is continuously ‘produced’ hence MFC can act as an accumulator • Mixed culture hence wider variety of ‘fuels’ can be utilised

  16. Gen-III

  17. Gen-III anodophillic mediatorless • G. sulfurreducens forms a monolayer on the electrode surface; utilises acetate • First reported species which forms a biofilm of only a single layer! • Cytochromes which use the electrode surface as the end terminal e- acceptor • Electrode becomes part of the microbe’s natural metabolism • The greater the e- demand, the better the performance

  18. Gen-? The ‘aromatic’ sewage sludge

  19. Gen-? Sewage sludge • Freely available • Energy from waste • Truly wide variety of ‘fuels’ including food waste • Sludge can be used as both the catalyst and fuel (waste treatment) • Can be trained to act as a sensor • No real threat of contamination

  20. VO/C = 1.5V VO/C = 0.8V MFC vs. AA alkaline battery AA alkaline cell AcSeSl MFC fed with chitin • Capacity = 2.8Ah • Capacity = 163mAh • Energy = 4.2Wh • Energy = 37.1mWh • Weight = 25g • Weight = 100g • ED = 604.8 J/g • ED = 1.33 J/g • Cost = £0.30 • Cost = £3.00 BUT MFCs offer continuous energy supply

  21. Self-sustainability • All of the aforementioned types of MFC can offer self-sustainability iff: • Open system (continuous flow) mode • Inflow of all the necessary ingredients especially the limiting substrate • Outflow of the waste products including dead cells

  22. Self-sustainability • Apart from Gen-I, all the other types of MFC can be used in a continuous mode • Combined with the O2 diffusion cathode, these could be used to power robots • POUT from MFCs is no match to the high energy demand of micro-fluidic pumps

  23. EcoBot II • Three kinds of behaviour: Directed locomotion Sensing Radio Transmission • All powered by MFC using raw substrate such as flies

  24. EcoBot II running on flies

  25. TimeAVE vs. distanceAVE for the 5 runs

  26. Temperature transmission

  27. EcoBot II energetics • Total number of MFCs: 8 • VO/C = 5V ( 8 x 0.6V) • IDIS = C x dV/dt = 26.23mA • ICH = C x dV/dt = 145.7μA • WCAP = ½ x C x (V)2 = 62.02mJ • WCAPOVERALL = 372.15mJ • DistanceAVE = 70cm • TimeAVE = 3hrs 15mins • Speed AVE = 20cm/h

  28. MFC typeCurrent [mA]Power [mW]Energy output [J]Energy input [J](Bomb cal)Efficiency %fly insect852149.7784.558chitin1533488.1222539.2peach601740.30123.732

  29. Implications • Need for ‘Pulsed Behaviour’ modes of operation • Impact on the ‘action-selection’ problem – the need to take into account future possibilities by storing energy

  30. Future work • Run EcoBot II with O2 cathode MFCs • Integrate ingestion and waste removal systems • Get the flies to the robot • Move to a continuous flow MFC using soft tubing

More Related