1 / 12

A Parallel Viterbi Decoder Implementation for High Throughput

A Parallel Viterbi Decoder Implementation for High Throughput. Muhammad Shoaib Bin Altaf. Outline. Motivation Actual Flow Optimizations Approach Results Conclusion. Motivation. Convolutional coding with Viterbi decoding a powerful method for FEC in Communication Systems

linh
Télécharger la présentation

A Parallel Viterbi Decoder Implementation for High Throughput

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Parallel Viterbi Decoder Implementation for High Throughput Muhammad Shoaib Bin Altaf

  2. Outline • Motivation • Actual Flow • Optimizations • Approach • Results • Conclusion

  3. Motivation • Convolutional coding with Viterbi decoding a powerful method for FEC in Communication Systems • Viterbi Algorithm is based on Maximum Likelihood Estimation which is sequential. Thus slow. • Modern Communications Standards like Wimax support very high throughput • Data speed is increasing so is the need for high speed Viterbi decoding • We are looking for such a scheme which gives vectorized output bits

  4. Actual Algorithmic Flow • We have done this stuff in our Homework as well • On building trellis, at each stage path metric will be computed • Best path metric computation at each stage • Traceback decoding done bit by bit • Each clock cycle, one bit will be decoded

  5. Optimization • VA is sequential but the “Good” thing is, it’s Recursive • Various optimization possibilities can be employed for speed-up. • Since the purpose was to have vectorized output, the only viable option is ‘Look Ahead Transformation’ • Discussed Look Ahead transformation for Hoffman decoding in the class • Block processing of the data

  6. Optimization Contd. • Decoding using 2 Look Ahead step.

  7. Optimization Contd. • Increasing the number of Look Ahead steps

  8. Optimization Contd. • Instead of 2 paths, we have to select the minimum among the 4 possible paths • Lookup table needs to be changed

  9. Approach • Matlab Simulation • N=10^5 bits of data • Two implementations of VA • Constraint Length K=3 • One based on simple decoding • Other based on Look Ahead Transformation • Performance comparison to justify the correctness of the suggested approach

  10. Results • Data processing speed nearly doubles on taking a single Look Ahead step.

  11. Results Contd.. • Performance Comaprsion

  12. Conclusion • Look Ahead Transformation is very attractive for increasing the throughput for Recursive Algorithms • No loss in decoding abilities • Depending on the Application Look Ahead step can be increased to any value • The extra hardware cost is nominal as compared to the achieved performance • In this Project the main focus was on speeding up the decoding rate irrespective of the extra hardware cost incurred

More Related