1 / 14

Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice

Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice. Preliminary Results from the 2006 Annual Request for Information October 23, 2006. THE RESPONSE RATE TO THIS YEAR’S ANNUAL REQUEST FOR INFORMATION INCREASED COMPARED WITH LAST YEAR.

loyal
Télécharger la présentation

Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice Preliminary Results from the 2006 Annual Request for Information October 23, 2006

  2. THE RESPONSE RATE TO THIS YEAR’S ANNUAL REQUEST FOR INFORMATION INCREASED COMPARED WITH LAST YEAR. • In 2005, 37 of 56 States and Territories completed the paper-based Request for Information. • In 2006, 42 out of 56 States and Territories completed the web-based Request for Information.

  3. QUESTION #1:Key Current and Emerging Issues Identified by 42 States

  4. COMPARISON OF 2005 AND 2006 EMERGING AND CURRENT ISSUES

  5. “OTHER” KEY CURRENT AND EMERGING ISSUES IN 2006 • Treatment and management of juvenile sex offenders (KY, UT) • Legislative and administrative reform issues concerning existing laws on juvenile justice (GU) • Noncompliance with Federal OJJDP core requirements (PR) • Need for more community-based treatment and residential treatment facilities (GU, SD) • Prevention and early intervention programming (SD, VT) • Engagement of Tribes in collaborative juvenile justice activities and programs (SD) • Improving the quality and availability of effective legal representation for juveniles (VA) • Culturally sensitive and appropriate assessment instruments and practices (WI) • Increased funding for community supervision (KS)

  6. QUESTION #2: 2006 RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE PRESIDENT AND TO CONGRESS

  7. 2006 RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE PRESIDENT AND TO CONGRESSA CLOSER LOOK AT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUNDING

  8. RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE PRESIDENT AND TO CONGRESSCOMPARISON OF 2005 AND 2006 RECOMMENDATIONS

  9. QUESTION #3: 2006 RECOMMENDATIONS TO OJJDP

  10. COMPARISON OF 2005 AND 2006 RECOMMENDATIONS TO OJJDP

  11. WHAT OJJDP CAN DO TO HELP THE SAGs:Evidence-based Programs

  12. WHAT OJJDP CAN DO TO HELP THE SAGs:Mental Health Assessment & Treatment and Substance Abuse

  13. WHAT OJJDP CAN DO TO HELP THE SAGs:DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT

  14. QUESTION #4:TOP THREE PROBLEMS LISTED IN MOST RECENT THREE-YEAR PLAN

More Related