SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

Norman Washington G arrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 08

madeson-taylor avatar
madeson-taylor
27 diapositives · 509 Views · Nov 30, 2014

Trip Generation at the Site Level. Norman Washington G arrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 08. Trip Rate Analysis. Typically used to estimate trips from sites rather than for whole cities or region Used for so-called traffic impact study. Trip Rate Analysis. Trip-Rate Analysis

#norman washington g arrick ce 2710 spring 2014 lecture 08 #norman washington g arrick ce 2710 spring 2014 lecture 08 ppt #powerpoint #presentation
Norman Washington G arrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 08 - slide 1
01 / 27Norman Washington G arrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 08
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Norman Washington G arrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 08
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. Trip Generation at the Site Level Norman Washington GarrickCE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 08

  2. Trip Rate Analysis • Typically used to estimate trips from sites rather than for whole cities or region • Used for so-called traffic impact study Norman W. Garrick

  3. Trip Rate Analysis • Trip-Rate Analysis Trip rate is estimated based on the characteristics of the trip generator or trip attractor. • Example • The characteristics of the trip generator is given in 1000 SQ. FT. • And the trip generation rate for each generator is given as TRIPS PER 1000 SQ. FT. • For example • Residential: Total Sq. Ft. = 2744 1000 sq. ft., Trip Gen. Rate = 2.4 trips/1000 sq.ft • TOTAL NO. of TRIP from residential land use = 2744*2.4 = 6586 Trips Norman W. Garrick

  4. ITE Trip Generation Manual Norman W. Garrick

  5. ITE Trip Generation ManualLow Rise Apartment, Weekday Norman W. Garrick

  6. ITE Trip Generation ManualLow Rise Apartment, Weekday 19 data points! Norman W. Garrick

  7. ITE Trip Generation ManualLimitations The data contained in Trip Generation are, by definition, from single-use developments where virtually all access is by private automobile and all parking is accommodated on site. For new developments with characteristics that reduce automobile use--located close to transit, containing a mix of uses, or charging for parking--the use of unadjusted average ITE trip-generation rates will in many cases drastically overestimate the amount of traffic generated. A corner store with no parking across from a subway station in a dense, transit-oriented development is often forecast to have the same impact as a 7-Eleven on a suburban highway. Ref:Playing the numbers game: when it comes to TODs, trip-generation figures can make all the difference by Millard-Ball, Adam, Siegman, Patrick http://www.entrepreneur.com/tradejournals/article/158211933.html Norman W. Garrick

  8. ITE Trip Generation ManualDangers of Overbuilding "The traffic engineering profession is just waking up to the fact that one can overbuild infrastructure so it no longer serves the community," continues Walters (a California-based principal at Fehr & Peers Associates). "When one tries to design facilities to cater to the maximum demand that may occur, one can end up with too much. "It's true of parking," Walters says. "It's also true of streets," where oversizing can lead to more lanes, wider lanes, and longer signal phases than are strictly warranted. This not only adds to development costs but reduces the amount of space available for trees and other amenities, and creates physical barriers in the community. Ref:Playing the numbers game: when it comes to TODs, trip-generation figures can make all the difference by Millard-Ball, Adam, Siegman, Patrick http://www.entrepreneur.com/tradejournals/article/158211933.html Norman W. Garrick

  9. Storrs Center Model Norman W. Garrick

  10. Storrs Center Model Village Road Norman W. Garrick

  11. Storrs Center Norman W. Garrick

  12. Storrs Center Google Earth The Site Norman W. Garrick

  13. Wetlands Forest Reserve Storrs Center Google Earth The Site Constraints Norman W. Garrick

  14. Storrs Center Google Earth The Site Built Area Norman W. Garrick

  15. Storrs Center Model Village Road Norman W. Garrick

  16. ITE Trip Generation Manual Proposed size of project Using TG Manual for Storrs Center Estimated number of trip ends = 24,600 Norman W. Garrick

  17. Using TG Manual in Storrs Centerwith Correction for Mixed Use Estimated number of trip ends = 15,900 Norman W. Garrick

  18. This estimate almost lead to the unnecessary widening of Storrs Road. The widen was prevent by change the design of the town center by providing two roads into the center not one as was originally design.

  19. Storrs Center 195 Problem Norman W. Garrick

  20. Storrs Center Importance of the Network Norman W. Garrick

  21. Modifying ITE for Mix Use The ITE procedure estimate 24,600 trip ends for Storrs Center In many projects this number is assumed to be the number of new VEHICLE trips Because Storrs Center is a mixed use, walking center that is close to the university the assumption that these are all vehicles is significant wrong.

  22. Estimating Number of New Vehicle Trips Factors Affect % of Trips that are Vehicle Trips • Mode Share • Mixed Use (internal capture) • Pass By Trips • Vehicle Occupancy Rate

  23. Estimating Reduction from ITEfor Storrs Mode Share – 50 % (walk, bike, transit) Mixed Use (internal capture) – 35 % Pass By Trips – 25 % Vehicle Occupancy Rate – 10 % Estimated New Vehicle Trips = 4700 per day

  24. Estimating Number of New Vehicle Tripsfor Storrs Mode Share = 0.5 * 24,600 = 12,300 Number of Vehicle Trips Accounting for Mode Share = 24,600 – (0.5*24,600) = 12,300 Amount of reduction due to Mixed Use = 0.35*12,300 = 4,305 Amount of reduction due to Pass By Trips = 0.25*12,300 = 3,075 Amount of reduction due to Vehicle Occupancy Rate = 0.10*12,300 = 1,230 Estimated New Vehicle Trips = 12,300 – (4,305 + 3,075 + 1,230) = 3,690

  25. 360 State, New Haven Actual versus Predicted New Trips

  26. 360 State, New Haven trip Generation over predict trips The 360 State Street was estimated to produce 674 PM peak hour vehicle trips Requiring the construction of 500 parking spaces Live monitoring shows only 116 trips (17% of what was predicted) - Mixed Use Trip Generation Model (New Haven and SCRCOG)