1 / 6

English Comp Week 4

Attend the Documentary Film Festival on December 7th from 6-9 PM at the Union Cinema Theatre for an extra credit opportunity. Participate in a reflective analysis of the films presented, focusing on the authors' rhetorical strategies. Consider their thesis, the effectiveness of their ethos, pathos, and logos, and how these elements resonate with diverse audiences. Your one-page reflection will explore the relevance of these artifacts to contemporary issues and provide your take on their overall impact.

marvin-carney
Télécharger la présentation

English Comp Week 4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. English Comp Week 4 Jorge gomez

  2. Attendance Reflection 4 One PARAGRAPH

  3. Film Festival Change Documentary Film Festival, Tuesday, Dec. 7th, 6-9 pm at the Union Cinema Theatre

  4. Extra Credit Opportunity • Pat Mora, Sep. 16, 7-8pm, UGLC 106 • Lecture by fiction author DagobertoGilbOct. 6 at Tomas Rivera Center, Union East • 5:30 PM - 7:30 PM • Peace of Art exhibit and panel discussion: • Oct. 14 at the UTEP Union Cinema 6-7:30 pm • ONE-page Reflection after event for each to count

  5. Rhet. Analysis Sample Structure • Introduce the Issue BRIEFLY • This is the CONTEXT • Introduce Artifact and Author of Artifact • What is the author’s thesis or purpose for writing/speaking? • What is she or he trying to ultimately prove? • State YOUR Thesis: Effective or ineffective rhetoric? • Why? Strong (ethos/pathos/logos) or Weak (pathos/ethos/logos) • Body of Paper: Analysis of ethos/pathos/logos • Which of the three were EFFECTIVE OVERALL and which INEFFECTIVE? • PARTS of each could be effective while WHOLE of each could be ineffective, and vice-versa • WHY? NEVER FORGET to state WHY. • Ethos includes RELEVANT bio and any conflict of interest (IF ANY) • Logos could INCLUDE fallacies (IF ANY) • In ANY order that fits. For example, • From weakest to strongest form of appeal or, • Strongest to weakest • Also, mention the AUDIENCES (remember, usually more than 1)

  6. Rhet. Analysis Sample Structure • Do not worry about VISUAL rhetoric…not yet • This goes for people who chose videos to analyze • Conclude by summarizing YOUR paper • Include Relevance of issue to YOUR audience (peers) • Why does this rhetorical artifact matter? • In other words, “so what?” • “Food for thought” = closing thoughts on ISSUE • What can YOUR audience take from this ARTIFACT? • If it was effective, is it powerful enough to change minds? • If it was ineffective, is there something to learn about rhetoric from WHY it was ineffective? • Do I want your opinion on the issue?

More Related