1 / 14

Chapter 4: Who Joins NRMs and Why?

Chapter 4: Who Joins NRMs and Why?. RELS 225 Cults and New Religious Movements. Joining NRMs : Who and Why?. Stark & Bainbridge say not: Gullible Losers Everyone Not the dregs; more like the best & brightest. One early theory. What were people lacking? What does the movement offer?

maxine
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 4: Who Joins NRMs and Why?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 4: Who Joins NRMs and Why? • RELS 225 • Cults and New Religious Movements

  2. Joining NRMs: Who and Why? • Stark & Bainbridge say not: • Gullible • Losers • Everyone • Not the dregs; more like the best & brightest.

  3. One early theory • What were people lacking? • What does the movement offer? • Where do they overlap? • That is where the ‘reason’ is to be found. • Derived from deprived classes converting to Christian sects.

  4. Then: the 60’s NRMs • The converts in the 1960’s were privileged. • So the theory was modified by Glock: • Relative deprivation: • Economic (poor) • Social (power, prestige) • Organismic (health, physical, & mental) • Psychic (love & affection) • Ethical (dissatisfaction with dominant values)

  5. 1965 Lofland & Stark • John Lofland & grad student Rodney Stark • (Stark published a recent book: Rise of Christianity) • Best early work on conversion. • Studied a group called “Divine Precepts” (Unification Church) • The very first cell of “Moonies” 12-15 of them. • Proposed two kinds of conditions necessary for conversion to a NRM

  6. 1965 Lofland & Stark • Predisposing conditions: • Experiencing Tensions • Religious orientation (predisposed) • Seeker (already reading, investigating)

  7. 1965 Lofland & Stark • Situational Contingencies: • Encounter • Bonds-making • Bond-breaking • Interacting

  8. Who in fact joins? • Join through social networks. • Affective ties • They liked the people. • Intensive interaction • Left when people disappointed them. • No other commitments (family, mortgage) • No ideological alignment • With history of seekership • People looking for rewards & compensations: • Needs (Affirmation, belonging, empowerment) • Meaning • Status (job opportunities; opportinity for advancement; leadership roles) • Other: • hostile environment (Christianity?) • Competition

  9. Joiners are not: • Brainwashed • making us all equally as susceptible • loners, social outcasts, or religious radicals.

  10. Characteristics • Young • Even younger in the 1970’s • Higher educated • Middle-upper middle class • No appeal to working class • Balanced male-female • Although varies by NRM: Moonies started male • More secular religious backgrounds • But large Jewish representation, especially in Zen.

  11. 1984: Two Resources • Radical Departures, by Saul Levine. • North American psychiatrist • Good for parents of cult members. • 800 interviews • The Making of a Moonie by Eileen Barker • British sociologist • Interviewed/surveyed all Moonie attendees for 10 years. • Compared with a control group.

  12. Barker’s findings: • Respectable families • Overachievers • Disrupted at university (disappointed with larger world)

  13. Levine’s findings: • No more psychopathology than normal • Overacheivers • Quietly suffering in frustration for years • Identify too strongly with parents • They like their parents. • Try to please them • No strong romantic relationship in adolescence • No all-nighters stoned, pondering metaphysics. • 90% of joiners left voluntarily in less than 2 years.

  14. Further Factors • 2. rationality of conversions • Same as other large decisions • e.g., what college to attend • determine benefits outweigh perceived costs. • 3. religious experience • Or perhaps people join because they have indeed experienced some sort of enlightenment

More Related