1 / 23

Enhancing Network Performance Through Optimal Routing Algorithms and Traffic Evaluation

This document explores the evaluation of routing algorithms focusing on performance metrics like packet delay and traffic flow using arrival rates and link statistics. It delves into optimization techniques that consider the average and variance of delays while assessing measures of congestion. The concepts of link capacity, traffic flow minimization, and reliable network design under various constraints are also discussed. Additionally, it provides strategies to optimize subnet design and traffic allocation through heuristic methods, ensuring effective communication in network topologies.

mechelle-rich
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing Network Performance Through Optimal Routing Algorithms and Traffic Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Flow Models and Optimal Routing

  2. Flow Models and Optimal Routing • How can we evaluate the performance of a routing algorithm • quantify how well they do • use arrival rates at nodes and flow on links • View each link as a queue with some given arrival statistics, try to optimize mean and variance of packet delay – hard to develop analytically

  3. … cont • Measure average traffic on link Fij • Measure can be direct (bps) or indirect (#circuits) • Statistics of entering traffic do not change (much) over time • Statistics of arrival process on a link • Change only due to routing updates

  4. Some Basics • What should be “optimized” Dij = link measure = Cij is link capacity and dij is proc./prop delay max (link measure) link measure These can be viewed as measures of congestion

  5. … cont • Consider a particular O – D pair in the network W. Input arrival is stationary with rate • W is set of all OD pairs • Pw is set of all paths p connection an OD pair • Xp is the flow on path

  6. The Path flow collection { Xp | w  W, p  PW } must satisfy The flow Fij on a link is minimize subject to

  7. This cost function optimizes link traffic without regard to other statistics such as variance. • Also ignores correlations of interarrival and transmission times

  8. Link capacity is 2 for all links 4 2 • ODs are (1,4), (2,4), (3,4) • A rate base algorithm would split the traffic 1 2  4 and 1  3  4 • What happens if source at 2 and 3 are non-poisson 3 1

  9. Recall that D(x) = Now, Where the derivative is evaluated at total flows corresponding to X If D’ij |x is treated as the “length” of link, then is the length of path p aka first derivative length of p aka first derivative of length p

  10. Let X* = {Xp*} be the optimal path flow vector • We shouldn’t be able to move traffic from p to p’ and still improve the cost ! Xp* > 0  • Optimal path flow is positive only on paths with minimum First Derivative Length • This condition is necessary. It is also sufficient in certain cases e.g. 2nd derivative of Dij exists and is positive over [0,Cij]

  11. C1 high capacity > X1 r 2 1 X2 > C2 low capacity minimize D(X) = D1(X1) + D2(X2) , r < C1+ C2 at optimum X1* + X2* = r , X1*, X2*  0

  12. X1* = r, X2* = 0 X1* > 0, X2* > 0 The 2 path lengths must be the same 2 2 2

  13. X1* X2* X1* X2* 0 r C1+C2 X1* + X2* = r

  14. Topology Design Given • Location of “terminals” that need to communicate • OD Traffic Matrix Design • Topology of a Communication Subnet location of nodes, their interconnects / capacity • The local access network

  15. Topology Design … cont Constrained by • Bound on delay per packet or message • Reliability in face of node / link failure • Minimization of capital / operating cost

  16. Subnet Design • Given Location of nodes and traffic flow select capacity of link to meet delay and reliability guarantee • zero capacity  no link • ignore reliability • assume liner cost metric Choose Cij to minimize

  17. Subnet Design … cont • Assuming M/M/1 model and Kleinrock independence approximation, we can express average delay constraint as  is total arrival rate into the network

  18. Subnet Design … cont • If flows are known, introduce a Lagrange multiplier  to get at L = 0 2

  19. Subnet Design … cont Solving for Cij gives A Substituting in constraint equation, we obtain Solving for 

  20. Subnet Design … cont Substituting in equation A Given the capacities, the “optimal” cost is • So far, we assume Fijs (routes) are known • One could now solve for Fij by minimizing the cost above w.r.t. Fij (since Cijs are eliminated) • However this leads to too many local minima with low connectivity that violates reliability

  21. C1 C2 r . . . . . . . Cn Subnet Design … cont Minimize C1 + C2 + … + Cn while meeting delay constraint This is a hard problem !!

  22. Some Heuristics • We know the nodes and OD traffic • We know our routing approach (minimize cost?) • We know a delay constraint, a reliability constraint and a cost metric

  23. Use a “Greedy” approach Loop Step 1: Start with a topology and assign flows Step 2: Check the delay and reliability constraints are met Step 3: Check improvement  gradient descent Step 4: Perturb 1 End Loop For Step 4 • Lower capacity or remove under utilized links • Increase capacity of over utilized link • Branch Exchange  Saturated Cut

More Related