1 / 12

Asynchronous Processor Design

Asynchronous Processor Design. for ELEC 6200 by Wei Jiang. Why Asynchronous Design. Higher Performance No global clock proceed data at appropriate rate of environment Do not propagate local delay globally Better Power Efficiency Only activating functional units consume power

megan
Télécharger la présentation

Asynchronous Processor Design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Asynchronous Processor Design for ELEC 6200 by Wei Jiang Jiang: Async. Processor

  2. Why Asynchronous Design • Higher Performance • No global clock • proceed data at appropriate rate of environment • Do not propagate local delay globally • Better Power Efficiency • Only activating functional units consume power • Inactivated parts remain in “stand-by” state • No wasteful power dissipation by glitches • Smaller Chip Size • Less high-frequency EMI components due to small amplitude and wide current peaks Jiang: Async. Processor

  3. Sync vs. Async Pipeline • Asynchronous Pipeline: • No global clock • No delay for clock transition Jiang: Async. Processor

  4. Dynamic Voltage Control • Power supply is controlled by measuring the occupancy of input FIFO • As FIFO fills the supply voltage will increase and the processor will operate faster to empty the FIFO Jiang: Async. Processor

  5. Asynchronous Circuit Design • Level-sensitive/Four-phase signaling protocol • simpler design • Transition-sensitive/two-phase protocol: • no “nonactive” state • fewer transitions • higher performance • lower power dissipation Jiang: Async. Processor

  6. Asynchronous Interface • Two-phase Pipeline handshake protocol • Sender to ensure that all bits of the data bundle are valid prior to sending the Request event (local delay management); • Receiver to accept the data bundle prior to sending its Acknowledge which will permit the Sender to remove the old data and place a new value on the data lines Jiang: Async. Processor

  7. Event Driven Pipeline • Components must respond to input transitions (events) rather than logic levels • Muller C-gate: outputs a transition only when all inputs have experienced transitions changing their input levels • Storage elements must respond identically to rising or falling transitions Jiang: Async. Processor

  8. Asynchronous Storage • Capture-Pass latch • Event on Capture line causes latch to hold input data • Capture-done event indicates completion of capture operation • Event on Pass line cause latch to return transparent state • Pass-done event indicates completion of pass operation • Interconnect Capture-Pass latches using Muller C-gates to form Pipeline Jiang: Async. Processor

  9. Prevention of Hazards • Data Hazards • An instruction depends on the results of a previous instruction still in the pipeline • Prevented by Register Locking mechanism:stall the instruction until write-back of register takes place • Pipeline must support multiple asynchronous read/write operations • Control Hazards • The instructions after branch instruction are loaded into pipeline but may not be executed • Prevented by Delayed Branch mechanism:the next instructions is always executed Jiang: Async. Processor

  10. Example: AMULET1 Jiang: Async. Processor

  11. Example: Asynchronous DLX Jiang: Async. Processor

  12. Conclusion • Asynchronous design is competitive with the best synchronous design in power efficiency and is close in performance and silicon area • References • SCALP: A Superscalar Asynchronous Low-Power Processor, Philip Brian Endecott, Ph.D thesis of University of Manchester, UK, 1996 • AMULET1: An Asynchronous ARM Microprocessor, J. V. Woods et al, IEEE Trans. on Computers, Vol.46.4, p.385-398, Apr 1997 • Automating the Design of an Asynchronous DLX Microprocessor, Manish Amde et al, DAC’03, p.502-507, June 2003 Jiang: Async. Processor

More Related