1 / 26

Nuclear Reactor Experiment Group III

Reactivity and Power Distribution Anomalies. Nuclear Reactor Experiment Group III. Prologue. 2002 IAEA AIRS. Prologue. Financial Efficiency. Life Safekeeping. Table of Contents. RCCA accident analysis. Accident Simulation. Conclusion. Rod bank uncontrolled out (Full Power).

meira
Télécharger la présentation

Nuclear Reactor Experiment Group III

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reactivity and Power Distribution Anomalies Nuclear Reactor Experiment Group III

  2. Prologue 2002 IAEA AIRS

  3. Prologue Financial Efficiency Life Safekeeping

  4. Table of Contents RCCA accident analysis Accident Simulation Conclusion

  5. Rod bank uncontrolled out (Full Power) RCCA Accident Analysis Reactivity Power Distribution Rod bank uncontrolled out (Low Power) Drop of a single control rod in CBC ANS Cond.II,III Rod bank uncontrolled in

  6. Hot Standby Hot Shutdown Startup Cold Shutdown Power Operation RCCA Accident Analysis Rod bank uncontrolled out (Full Power) Rod bank uncontrolled out (Low Power) Drop of a single control rod in CBC Rod bank uncontrolled in

  7. Variable List Net Reactivity Relative Prompt Power Normalized Thermal Power Dist. Average Fuel Temperature Core Coolant Temperature DNBR

  8. 2 Group Diffusion Equation Power & flux relation Define

  9. Multiplication constant Reactivity Power & flux relation Eigenvalue problem

  10. Accident Simulation Rod bank uncontrolled out (Power 50%) Rod bank uncontrolled out (Low Power) Drop of a single control rod in CBC Rod bank uncontrolled in

  11. Rod bank uncontr. out (Power 50%) Condition to Simulate • Operating State : Power (50%) • Duration Time : 130 (s) • Bank D Withdrawal • Initial Core Condition • Temperature(°C) : 537 • Pressure(Pa): 1.56 X 10^7 • Reactivity : 3.66 X 10^-6 • DNBR : 2.05 D D D D

  12. Rod bank uncontr. out (Power 50%)

  13. Rod bank uncontr. out (Power 50%)

  14. Rod bank uncontr. out (Hot Standby) Condition to Simulate • Original Target : Neutron Flux Trip • CNS : Absence of Neutron Flux detect function • ->Non neutron flux trip • Alternative proposal • -Malfunction of Bank “D” at Hotstanby state • -Net Reactivity, Thermal power transient • -Etc., Transient features

  15. Rod bank uncontr. out (Hot Standby) Condition to Simulate • Operating State : Hot Standby • Duration Time : 200 (s) • Bank D Withdrawal • Initial Core Condition • Temperature (°C) : 292 • Pressure(Pa) : 1.56 X 10^7 • Reactivity : 1.7 X 10^-2 • DNBR : 10 D D D D

  16. Rod bank uncontr. out (Hot Standby)

  17. Rod bank uncontr. out (Hot Standby) DNB Heat flux predicted applicable correlation DNBR= Reactor local heat flux

  18. Drop of a single control rod in CBC Condition to Simulate • Operating State : Full Power • Duration Time : 200 (s) • Single Rod Drop • Initial Core Condition • Temperature (°C) : 734 • Pressure (Pa) : 1.55 X 10^7 • Reactivity : 8.16 X 10^-8 • DNBR : 1.34 C

  19. Drop of a single control rod in CBC

  20. Drop of a single control rod in CBC

  21. Rod bank uncontrolled in Condition to Simulate A • Operating State : Full Power • Duration Time : 400 (s) • Bank A Drop • Initial Core Condition • Temperature (°C) : 734 • Pressure(Pa) : 1.55 X 10^7 • Reactivity : 8.16 X 10^-8 • DNBR : 1.34 A A A

  22. Rod bank uncontrolled in

  23. Rod bank uncontrolled in

  24. Rod bank uncontrolled in

  25. Conclusion • Confirm equations and it’s implications relating to Reactor core • Verify the correlation of RCCA position change and Reactor condition variables • Safety acknowledgement through accident simulation • Unrealistic setup which is not applicable to conservative assumption

More Related