1 / 32

Recent PFA Performance and Higgs Study using Kinematical Fit

Recent PFA Performance and Higgs Study using Kinematical Fit. JSPS Creative Scientific Research Monthly Meeting @ KEK Oct. 26 th , 2006 Tamaki Yoshioka ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo On behalf of GLD Colleagues. Introduction. Most of the important physics processes to be studied in the ILC

milton
Télécharger la présentation

Recent PFA Performance and Higgs Study using Kinematical Fit

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Recent PFA Performance and Higgs Study using Kinematical Fit JSPS Creative Scientific Research Monthly Meeting @ KEK Oct. 26th, 2006 Tamaki Yoshioka ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo On behalf of GLD Colleagues JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  2. Introduction • Most of the important physics processes to be studied in the ILC • experiment have multi-jets in the final state. • → Jet energy resolution is the key in the ILC physics. • The best energy resolution is obtained by reconstructing • momenta of individual particles avoiding double counting among • Trackers and Calorimeters. • - Charged particles (~60%) measured by Tracker. • - Photons (~30%) by electromagnetic CAL (ECAL). • - Neutral hadrons (~10%) by ECAL + hadron CAL (HCAL). • → Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) • In this talk, general scheme and performance of the GLD-PFA, • using the GEANT4-based full simulator (Jupiter),will be presented. JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  3. Geometry in Jupiter Solenoid TPC Hadron Calorimeter (HCAL) VTX, IT Muon Detector Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL) As of August 06 JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  4. Calorimeter Geometry in Jupiter Readout Line =10cm 349.4cm BarrelHD 229.8cm BarrelEM 210cm 270cm EndcapHD Barrel.InnerRadius=210cm EndcapEM Endcap.InnerRadius=40cm IP Barrel.HalfZ=280cm 419.4cm 280cm 299.8cm JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  5. Calorimeter Structure Active Layer Absorber Current cell size : 2x2cm Can be changed. ECAL W/Scinti./Gap 3/2/1 (mm) x 33 layers HCAL Fe/Scinti./Gap 20/5/1 (mm) x 46 layers JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  6. Realistic PFA JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  7. Z-pole Event Display End View Side View - 2cm x 2cm tile (GLD backup solution) is used in this study. JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  8. Particle Flow Algorithm for GLD Flow of GLD-PFA • Photon Finding • Charged Hadron Finding • Neutral Hadron Finding • Satellite Hits Finding • *Satellite hits = calorimeter hit cell which does not belong • to a cluster core Note : Monte-Carlo truth information is used for muon and neutrino. JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  9. Photon Likelihood - Five variables are selected to form the photon likelihood function. velocity meanlay trkdis Photon Other Output chi2 Edep/nhits Other Photon JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  10. Particle Flow Algorithm for GLD Flow of GLD-PFA • Photon Finding • Charged Hadron Finding • Neutral Hadron Finding • Satellite Hits Finding • *Satellite hits = calorimeter hit cell which does not belong • to a cluster core Note : Monte-Carlo truth information is used for muon and neutrino. JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  11. Charged Hadron Finding • Basic Concept : • Extrapolate the charged track and calculate a distance between • a calorimeter hit cell and the extrapolated track. Connect the cell • that in a certain tube radius (clustering). Extrapolated Track • Calculate the distance • for any track/calorimeter • cell combination. HCAL Tube Radius Hit Cells • Tube radius for ECAL • and HCAL can be changed • separately. distance ECAL Calorimeter input position Charged Track JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  12. Particle Flow Algorithm for GLD Flow of GLD-PFA • Photon Finding • Charged Hadron Finding • Neutral Hadron Finding • Satellite Hits Finding • *Satellite hits = calorimeter hit cell which does not belong • to a cluster core Note : Monte-Carlo truth information is used for muon and neutrino. JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  13. Neutral Hadron Likelihood - Four variables are selected to form the NHD likelihood function. Output velocity Edensity Neutral Hadron Satellite Hits Edep/nhits meanlayer Neutral Hadron Satellite Hits JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  14. e+ e- Yellow : Photon Red,Green : Charged Hadron Black,Blue : Neutral Hadron Z → qqbar @ 91.2GeV Event Display JSPS Meeting @ KEK Next: 電子、陽電子衝突

  15. Event Display Yellow : Photon Red,Green : Charged Hadron Black,Blue : Neutral Hadron Gamma Finding JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  16. Event Display Yellow : Photon Red,Green : Charged Hadron Black,Blue : Neutral Hadron Charged Hadron Finding JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  17. Event Display Yellow : Photon Red,Green : Charged Hadron Black,Blue : Neutral Hadron Satellite Hits Finding JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  18. Event Display Yellow : Photon Red,Green : Charged Hadron Black,Blue : Neutral Hadron Remaining : Neutral Hadron JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  19. Jet Energy Resolution (Z-pole) - Z → uds @ 91.2GeV, tile calorimeter, 2cm x 2cm tile size All angle • Performance in the EndCap region is remarkably improved recently. • Almost no angular dependence : 31%/√E for |cosq|<0.9. JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  20. Performance - Energy-weighted Efficiency and Purity Definition Efficiency : xxx  (total xx E in collected hits)/(true xxx total E in CAL) Purity : Pxxx (total xxx E in a cluster)/(total E in a cluster) xxx = Photon, CHD, NHD, Satellite both  and P values are energy-weighted JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  21. Jet Energy Resolution - Energy dependence of jet energy resolution. - Jet energy resolution linearly degrades. (Fitting region : |cosq|<0.9) JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  22. Linearity - Good linearity. Jet energy can be corrected. JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  23. Zh Study JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  24. Typical Event Display • ZH → nnh : Two jets from Higgs can be seen. JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  25. Zh → nn h @ 350GeV - Fast MC • w/o correction • w/ correction Higgs Mass Visible Energy • - Jet energy is corrected by an empirical • formula obtained by Z → qqbar studies. • - Selection Criteria • 90 < Evis < 200 GeV • pt >20 GeV/c Missing Mass JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  26. Kinematical Fit (2jet) • - 6 Measured Variables • Jet1 : Ej1, qj1, jj1 • Jet2 : Ej2, qj2, jj2 (Note : Ej1 >Ej2) • - 3 Unmeasured Variables • Z0 : Ez, qz, jz • 4 Constraints • pj1cosjj1sinqj1 + pj2cosjj2sinqj2 + pZcosjZsinqZ = 0 • pj1sinjj1sinqj1 + pj2sinjj2sinqj2 + pZsinjZsinqZ = 0 • pj1cosqj1 + pj2cosqj2 + pZcosqZ = 0 • Ej1 + Ej2 + Ez – Ecm = 0 • (Note: jet mass is fixed : pfit = √{Efit2– (Emeas2 – pmeas2)} ) • → 1C-fit can be performed. JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  27. Fitted Results (2jet) Prob > 0.02 • Higgs mass resolution is slightly improved. … But, • Peak at prob=1 indicates the fitting didn’t work well. JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  28. Fitted Results (2jet) JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  29. Kinematical Fit (4jet) - 12 Measured Variables Jet1 : Ej1, qj1, jj1, Jet2 : Ej2, qj2, jj2 (Higgs pair) Jet3 : Ej3, qj3, jj3, Jet4 : Ej4, qj4, jj4 (Z0 pair) - 5 Constraints pj1cosjj1sinqj1 + pj2cosjj2sinqj2 + pj3cosjj3sinqj3 + pj4cosjj4sinqj4 = 0 pj1sinjj1sinqj1 + pj2sinjj2sinqj2 + pj3sinjj3sinqj3 + pj4sinjj4sinqj4 = 0 pj1cosqj1 + pj2cosqj2 + pj3cosqj3 + pj4cosqj4 = 0 Ej1 + Ej2 + Ej3 + Ej4 – Ecm = 0 Ej3 + Ej4 – √{(pfit,j3+ pfit,j4) 2 + Mz2} = 0 (Note: jet mass is fixed (OPAL method) pfit = √{Efit2– (Emeas2 – pmeas2)} ) → 5C-fit can be performed. JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  30. Fitted Results (4jet) Prob > 0.02 • Higgs mass resolution is slightly improved. … But, • Peak at prob=1 indicates the fitting didn’t work well. JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  31. Fitted Results (4jet) JSPS Meeting @ KEK

  32. Summary • Realistic PFA has been developed using the GEANT-4 based full simulator of the GLD detector. • Jet energy resolution is studied by using Z->qq events. ILC goal of 30% has been achieved for Z-pole events. • ZH study based on current PFA performance is now ongoing. Kinematical fitting is employed to get a better performance, but it didn’t work well so far. JSPS Meeting @ KEK

More Related