1 / 14

OCM BOCES

OCM BOCES. APPR Regulations As of 3.22.12. APPR. NOTE: All that is left for implementation is the Governor’s signature. 20% Student Growth. 60% Multiple Measures. 20% Student Achievement. APPR. Growth over time. Knowledge of Students & Student Learning. Compared to Expected Growth.

morrison
Télécharger la présentation

OCM BOCES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of 3.22.12

  2. APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation is the Governor’s signature. 20% StudentGrowth 60% Multiple Measures 20% StudentAchievement

  3. APPR Growth over time Knowledge of Students & Student Learning Compared toExpected Growth Some VariablesConsidered Knowledge of Content & Instructional Planning 20% StudentGrowth SLOs Required InstructionalPractice 60% Multiple Measures Moment in timeor growth LearningEnvironment 20% StudentAchievement Could be school- wide measure Assessment forStudent Learning Local orPurchased Professional Responsibilitiesand Collaboration Some VariablesConsidered SLOs Optional ProfessionalGrowth

  4. Revised Regulations Overall Differences • Does not impact district decisions with regard to probationary teachers and principals • Subcomponent scores provided by last day of school; summative by September 1st • Appeals must be timely and expeditious • Submit plans (prescribed form?) to SED for approval by July 1st (but no penalty until January withhold aid action) • SED will monitor scores (low correlation, inadequate differentiation) • HEDI points (91-100, 75-90, 65-74, 0-64) need to be set up for each of the three components at beginning of the year

  5. Revised Regulations Content of APPR Plan • Plan to ensure SED gets all the data they require, including teacher subcomponent scores • Assessment development, securing, and scoring procedures • Describe how 60% are determined • Describe “timely feedback” and provision of subcomponent and summative scores • Appeals process • Improvement plan process • Required certifications (Lead Evaluator, etc.) and process for ensuring reliability over time

  6. Revised Regulations Growth over time Compared toExpected Growth Changes: • HEDI point ranges (which can matter when setting SLO Gs) • Some more options mentioned • Score distribution monitored by SED with the right to be inspect assessments in SLOs • 3rd part assessments will not be required for any subjects (but are an option) • Attendance may not be considered Some VariablesConsidered 20% StudentGrowth SLOs Required 60% Multiple Measures

  7. Revised Regulations Changes: • HEDI definitions (well-above, meet, below, well-below) • Could use different assessments in different schools if “certified” comparability • Some more options mentioned, including state assessments in a different way • Score distribution monitored by SED • School-wide measures permitted • Attendance may not be considered 20% StudentGrowth 60% Multiple Measures Moment in timeor growth 20% StudentAchievement Could be school- wide measure Local orPurchased Some VariablesConsidered SLOs Optional

  8. Revised Regulations Changes: Knowledge of Students & Student Learning • At least 31 points based on observations (out of the total 60) • At least one observation unannounced (of the multiple observations) • Score distribution monitored by SED • Feedback gathering from parents or students must use approved tool • Stand alone goals no longer permitted Knowledge of Content & Instructional Planning InstructionalPractice 60% Multiple Measures LearningEnvironment Assessment forStudent Learning Professional Responsibilitiesand Collaboration ProfessionalGrowth

  9. APPR Rubrics: Knowledge of Students & Student Learning • In our BOCES, one of these three being used (so far): • FFT 2007 (ASCD) • FFT 2011 (Teachscape) • Professional Practice (NYSUT & NYSED) Knowledge of Content & Instructional Planning InstructionalPractice 60% Multiple Measures LearningEnvironment Assessment forStudent Learning Professional Responsibilitiesand Collaboration ProfessionalGrowth

  10. Revised Regulations Points: <29 points Outside, impartial observation Peer observation Student feedback Parent feedback Other evidence of student development and performance (lesson plans, portfolios, other artifacts) 31-60 points Based on multiple observations Use an approved rubric

  11. Revised Regulations Points: 60 points Could all be from the rubric

  12. Revised Regulations Points: >31 points From the rubric from multiple observations <29 points From the list of other possibilities, would need system of point determination

  13. APPR Rubrics: FFT 2011 Four Domains No cost to use rubrics Can only be used with Teachscape electronic system FFT 2007 Four Domains No cost to use rubrics Can be used with 3rd party electronic systems NYS Practice NYS Teaching Standards (7) No cost to use rubrics Can be used with 3rd party electronic systems

  14. OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of 3.22.12

More Related