1. OCM BOCES Annual Professional Performance Review 2012-2013

2. Committee Work • Goal – Design an evaluation system that improves instructional practice and student learning. • Committee met 7 full days from October-May • Committee Membership • 8 OCMBFT Members • 8 Administrators • All Departments Represented

3. 20 + 20 + 60 =100 20% StudentGrowth 60% Multiple Measures 20% StudentAchievement

4. 60 Points for Multiple Measures • Evidence collected throughout the school year • Teacher submits evidence • Administrator collects evidence from observation • At least three 5-15 minutes-long mini-observation for all teachers (written feedback within 2 days) • Also one extended observation (including pre and post-conference) for probationary teachers

5. 60 Points for Multiple Measures • Collected evidence gets sorted according to the 7 NYS Teaching Standards • At end of the year, collected evidence is compared to the NYSUT Professional Practice Rubric • Committee chose NYSUT Rubric instead of Danielson Rubric because of strong alignment to NYS Teaching Standards.

6. 60 Points for Multiple Measures • Levels on the rubric get converted to points: • Highly Effective = 4.0 pts • Effective = 3.3 pts • Developing = 2.8 pts • Ineffective = 0 pts

7. 60 Points for Multiple Measures • Levels on the rubric get converted to points: • Highly Effective = 4.0 pts • Effective = 3.3 pts • Developing = 2.8 pts • Ineffective = 0 pts

8. 60 Points for Multiple Measures • Levels on the rubric get converted to points: • Highly Effective = 4.0 pts • Effective = 3.3 pts • Developing = 2.8 pts • Ineffective = 0 pts • 4.0 pts • 3.3 pts • 4.0 pts • 2.8 pts

9. 60 Points for Multiple Measures • Scores on indicators for each Indicator within a Teaching Standard get averaged into an overall score for each Teaching Standard • Scores for the 7 Teaching Standards get averaged for the overall rubric score • Overall rubric score gets translated to 60 points

10. 20 Points for Student Growth • State provides these points for 4-8 ELA and math teachers • Everyone else must make a Student Learning Objective to figure these points out for ourselves

11. 20 Points for Student Growth • Student Learning Objective is a process the state has prescribed • Set goals for the most important learning • Based on where your kids are starting the year • Common teachers will collaborate on measures • No one will have 10 SLOs • Varied and vast • Additional training

12. INGREDIENTS

13. INGREDIENTS

14. 20 Points for Local Achievement • A lot like the SLOs • Same basic process and format • Can’t be exactly the same as the SLO used for State Growth 20% • Like SLOs, committee structure will select assessments.

15. 20 + 20 + 60 =100 20% StudentGrowth 60% Multiple Measures 20% StudentAchievement

16. Annual Summative Evaluation • 20 + 20 + 60 = Annual Summative Score for each teacher • HEDI (91-100, 75-90, 65-74, 0-64) • Final score by the end of the year (unless waiting for state’s 20%) • Appeals process • If “developing” or  “ ineffective,” will have improvement plan for following year

17. A Year at a Glance • Beginning of the year meeting between teacher and Lead Evaluator • Set Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) • Baseline information about students and plans for the year • Mini-observations (and possible extended observation) • End of the year meeting between teacher and Lead Evaluator • Review SLOs • Compare evidence to rubric • Summative evaluation

18. A Work in Progress • APPR Committee will meet mid-year to discuss how the process is working. • At the end of the year the APPR Committee will re-convene to make changes if appropriate.

19. Questions?