SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

Innovative Scholarship Evaluation Guidelines at USC

mosesb avatar
mosesb
7 diapositives · 103 Views · Dec 20, 2019

This guide details the University of Southern California's approach to evaluating digital scholarship, emphasizing fair assessment without forcing printouts of born-digital work. It addresses the importance of engaging reviewers familiar with digital scholarship topics and stresses the need for appropriate evaluation methods for collaborative work. Topics for advancing research include gaming, social media, mobile devices, audience interaction, and libraries. The guidelines aim to support a range of scholarly styles and welcome innovative approaches while advocating for digital reviews as the standard method for assessing digital scholarship.

#innovative scholarship evaluation guidelines at usc #innovative scholarship evaluation guidelines at usc ppt #powerpoint #presentation
Innovative Scholarship Evaluation Guidelines at USC - slide 1
1 / 7

Télécharger la présentation

Innovative Scholarship Evaluation Guidelines at USC
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. Attribution

  2. Tenure: UCAPT Manual “recognizes and supports a variety of styles of scholarship, both independent and collaborative”

  3. Tenure: Digital Scholarship “UCAPT welcomes innovative approaches to scholarship”

  4. Guidelines for Evaluation of Digital Scholarshipusc.edu/academe/acsen/Documents/Reports/URC%20Digital%20Scholarship%20Eval%20Guidelines%20final.pdf “Review the Work Appropriately . Digital scholarship should be evaluated in the medium in which it is produced. Candidates should not be asked to print out work that is best assessed in its born digital form, and reviewers should be provided appropriate information to undertake a fair assessment. Committees must also engage appropriate reviewers who are familiar with the specific area of digital scholarship in which the faculty member conducts research, as all digital scholarship is not the same. If the scholarship being evaluated is collaborative, care should be taken to follow UCAPT recommendations for the assess ment of collaborative work. We also note that nearly all scholarship today is produced in digital format, and therefore digital review should become the norm, while review by paper should be come the exception.” .

  5. Topics for Today • Gaming • Social media and networking • Mobile devices • Audience interaction • Libraries How can we best utilize these tools to advance research at USC?