1 / 53

Principles of Signal Detection & Risk Management in Pharmacovigilance

Principles of Signal Detection & Risk Management in Pharmacovigilance. Dr Pipasha Biswas MD MFPM DM MRQA Principal Consultant & Director Symogen Limited, UK. ISPRT & SOPI Conference, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi 26 – 28 November 2010. Topics Covered in This Session.

nydia
Télécharger la présentation

Principles of Signal Detection & Risk Management in Pharmacovigilance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Principles of Signal Detection & Risk Management in Pharmacovigilance Dr PipashaBiswas MD MFPM DM MRQA Principal Consultant & Director Symogen Limited, UK. ISPRT & SOPI Conference, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi 26 – 28 November 2010

  2. Topics Covered in This Session • What is Signal Detection? • Methodologies in Signal Detection. • Usefulness of Signal Detection in Pharmacovigilance • How is a Signal Identified and what is done next • What is Risk management • Components of an RMP

  3. Introduction • Populations exposed to any drug during post marketing period vary vastly than those studied during the development of the compound • In daily practice – real world situation - Patients are not selected - Diverse patient populations - large patient population - Polypharmacy - Several underlying disease factors and concomitant medications

  4. Introduction • New information on the benefits and risks of any drug may be generated at any time after marketing • Continuously monitor the safety of the compound/drug throughout the life cycle product • Continuously assess the benefit risk profile in order to guarantee patient safety

  5. What is a Signal? • Reported information on a possible causal relationship between an adverse event and a drug, the relationship being unknown or incompletely documented previously. WHO Definition • Hypothesis generating • Does not establish any causal relationship between the drug and the event • Suggests further studies • Should be quick and credible

  6. Other Definitions of Signal • Early identification of suspected signals with subsequent generation of hypothesis • Hypothesis of a signal can be generated by identification of: - unexpected SAE (also non-serious) or change in its severity - Increases in reporting frequency of an expected event - AEs experienced in special population groups (i.e. Paediatric, elderly, hepato-renal compromised patients etc)

  7. SIGNAL: New Safety Information • A new Signal - Unidentified - Unlabelled • New information from an existing signal - Change in frequency - Change in severity • Information on risk factors

  8. Sources of Signals • Premarketing Trials Database • Spontaneous Reports of ADRs - Individual company database - AERS database - WHO-UMC - EMEA - National & Regional RA database • Published Literature • Epidemiology/Registries • Automated Databases - GPRD - IMS - Medicaid - Kaiser Permanante • Others - PEM - MEMO

  9. Signal Detection Process Flow Detection of a Signal Generation of Hypothesis Verification Decision to be taken Information

  10. Factors to Consider in Signal Detection Considerations for when a Drug-Event Pair is a Signal Patient Characteristics Trends Pharmacological Plausibility Class Effect SIGNAL Drug Event Pair Commonly drug- Related event Related Similar Events DPA Over Time DPA Score

  11. Evaluating Signals Using Evidence Hierarchy Signal Detection Process Signal Identified Other Databases (AERS, WHO) Clinical Trial Data (ISS, ISO) Information Gathering Pre-Clinical animal Toxicology & Pharmacology Spontaneous Data Including DPA Info Epidemiology Literature

  12. Methodologies in Signal Detection • Several methodologies are used and available for the purpose of signal detection activities • Quantitative • Qualitative • RA, Drug monitoring Centres and Pharmaceutical Companies have developed computerised data mining methods for the purpose of early identification of safety signals in spontaneous reporting databases • To date there is no guideline or standard method for performing signal detection activities

  13. Data Quality • Data Quality of all case reports entered into the safety database is essential in order to retrieve and extract the correct safety information • Completeness and correctness of the ICSR information is the key to good signal detection • Quality check of entered data

  14. How Signal detection is done? • Qualitative Analysis: - Signal case/multiple report evaluation Combined with or without • Qualitative Analysis - Automated identification of signals

  15. Qualitative Analysis • Case by case review and thorough assessment by medically qualified persons • Systematic review of multiple case reports - review of cummulative data - review of frequency trends over time and frequency rates to specific PTs and/or SMQs and/or HLTs or even SOCs with combined retrospective analysis using computerised tools • Pre-clinical data, scientific support documentation, characteristics of patient population exposed, pharmacological plausibility etc are evaluated in detail

  16. Quantitative Analysis • Various automated statistical methods used in analysis of safety data • Most commonly used are; - Proportional reporting Ratio (PRR): MHRA - Reporting Odd’s Ratio (ROR): LAREB - Multi-item Gama Poisson Shrinker (MGPS): FDA - Bayesian Confidence Propogation Neural Network (BCPNN): UMC

  17. Quantitative analysis • The key main concept of such statistical method is “Disproportion or more than what is Expected”.

  18. Statistical Tools Used for Signal Detection • All measures are calculated from a 2x2 table - Proportional Rate Ratio (PRR) - Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) - Relative Reporting Ratio (RRR) - Information Component (IC; Bayesian)

  19. Statistical Tools Used for Signal Detection • All measures are calculated from a 2x2 table - Proportional Rate Ratio (PRR) - Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) - Relative Reporting Ratio (RRR) - Information Component (IC; Bayesian)

  20. PRR • PRR is the ratio of the number of reports of: • Event of interest for drug of interest Event of interest for all other drugs/All events for drug of interest All events for all other drugs • PRR > 1 - positive quantitative association between the drug and the event of interest.

  21. Multi-Item Gamma Poison Shrinker (MGPS) Adjusted relative Reporting ratio (After modelling) Reporting Ratio Modified Reporting Ratio Stratification (e.g. gender, Age, year) Bayesian shrinkage To address small cell sizes Empiric Bayesian Geometric Mean EB05 EB95 EBGM DuMouchel W, Pregibon D. Emperical bayes screening for multi-item associations. Proceedings of the Conference on knowledge discovery and data; 2001 Aug 26-29; San Diego (CA): ACM Press: 67-76.

  22. Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM) • EBGM is an Observed/Expected score that is the output of the MGPS method • EB05 and EB95 are the lower and upper limits of the 2-sided 90% CI around EBGM • Interpretation: - If EBGM = 7.2 for paracetamol-hepatic failure, then this drug-event combination occurred in the data set 7.2 times more frequently than expected - If EB05 + 4, then the drug-event occurred at least 4 times more frequently in the data set than expected • Thresholds used for Data Mining: - EB05 ≥ 2 will flag drug-event combinations that occur at least twice as often expected

  23. Measures Used for Signal Detection • All measures of SDR are basically calculations of Observed/Expected event/drug reports • Since Expected Data originates from the same pool as the Observed Data – cannot use a PRR as an RR nor a ROR as a OR • Expected Data in epidemiology comes from sources other than the Observed • Expected Data in PV also referred to as “Background”

  24. Measures Used for Signal Detection • Since the calculation is O/E, the relationship between background and statistic of interest is inversely related - As background increases resulting statistic decreases (large E results in small PRR) - As background decreases resulting statistic increases (Small E results in large PRR)

  25. What does the MAH do when a signal has be confirmed and strengthened? Variation of CCSI/SPC/PIL Provision of the safety information to HCP and/or patients PASS Further to validate a signal Update of Risk management Plan Presentation of the Signal in the PSUR with planned future actions

  26. Principles of Risk Management in Pharmacovigilance

  27. HrithikRoshan Suffered Drug Allergy • By SUNIL Sonkar November 22 — Bollywood actor HrithikRoshan was hospitalised on Sunday to KokilabenDhirubhaiAmbani Hospital in Mumbai after his lungs practically collapsed. Hrithik was unable to breathe and his lips became ten times bigger and face was also swollen. The problem started when he took an antibiotic after complain of chest infection, which led to strong allergy. He took the tablet on Saturday. Though he was discharged in the evening, but was kept under observation. He said, “It was an allergic reaction to the antibiotics I was taking. Lungs and throat went into spasm. I reached hospital just in time…All cool now. I’m under observationIt was an allergic reaction to the antibiotics I was taking. Lungs and throat went into spasm. I reached hospital just in time…All cool now. I’m under observation.” • Hrithik also revealed later that a delay of about 15-minute would make the condition fatal. • He complained of temperature, headache, backache, muslce pain and tiredness earlier. • Family members of the star are quite shocked and also scared over his condition

  28. The Bar is Being Raised Across the Industry for Formal Risk Management Planning • While approval times are decreasing, industry has experienced high profile withdrawals in recent times • Product Safety is under increasing scrutiny - Patients - Prescribers - Regulators - Auditors - Media - Legal • Industry is moving quickly to design and implement Risk Management processes • Risk Management Programs can enable challenging products to stay on the market (by supporting the use of appropriate products by appropriate patients)

  29. What is Risk Management? • The activities and interventions deployed to a drug, in order to manage and mitigate known and possible risks, with the aim of protecting the individual • Identification and implementation of strategies to reduce risk to individuals & populations • A continuous process of minimising a product’s risks throughout its life cycle in order to optimise that product’s risk/benefit balance

  30. Why Manage Risk Proactively? • Regulatory Expectation - US, Europe, ICH E2E • Company Perspective - to understand the risk profile - to protect the company’s asset • Patient perception - expect safe and effective drugs - do not fully understand risks • Need to change prescribing behaviour: labelling not always sufficient

  31. Risk Management – A Shift in Emphasis “New Model” Modify in the light of new safety data Pre-marketingRisk Assessment ISS Safety Specification Pharmacovigilance Plan ± Risk Minimization Plan/ Risk Map Approval Risk Management Implementation • Traditional analyses plus • Anticipated conditions of use • Intrinsic/extrinsic risks (identified and potential) • Epidemiology of disease • Benefit : risk assessment • Enhanced PMS/ Communication activities • Active influence on safe use in the market place • Assessment of RM programme effectiveness New data

  32. Overall Objectives of Risk Management Planning Benefit - Risk Optimization

  33. Optimizing Benefit Risk High Unacceptable Risk Manageable Risk Risk Acceptable Risk Low Low High Benefit

  34. Risk Management Strategy • Product Risk Management Plan Plan identifying the risks associated with a medicinal product, methods to further clarify the safety profile and ways to minimise risk to individual patients in clinical use • Three elements Pharmacovigilance specification Pharmacovigilance Plan Risk Minimisation “toolkit”

  35. Risk Management Definition Risk Management = Risk Assessment + Risk Minimization

  36. Safety Specification Risk Minimization Summary of important identified risks, important potential risks and missing information (ICH E2E) Activities to be taken to minimize the impact of specific safety concerns on the benefit-risk balance Pharmacovigilance Plan Based on safety specification; Routine PV practices and action plan to investigate specific safety concerns (ICH E2E) Basic Components of a Risk Management Plan b Risk Management Plan

  37. RMP Elements • Identified pre-clinical concerns • Missing Pre-clinical data • ADRs in clinical trials (including seriousness and predictability) • Potential ADRs requiring further evaluation to clarify a risk hypothesis • Population not studied in the pre-approval phase • Documented interactions • Potential for unidentified interactions that may occur post-approval • Disease epidemiology • Class effects

  38. Pharmacovigilance Specification • A structured method of documenting the established risks of a drug and the potential for unidentified risks at the time of marketing authorisation

  39. Safety Specification Purpose The Safety Specification should be a summary of the • [important] identified risks of a medicinal product, • [important] potential risks, • important missing information. • populations potentially at risk • outstanding safety questions which warrant further investigation • identifies any need for specific data collection to refine understanding of the benefit-risk profile during the post-authorisation period.

  40. Safety Specification Content Non-clinical and Clinical Part of the Safety Specification Limitations of the Human Safety DatabasePopulations not studied in the Pre-Authorisation Phase Adverse Events/Adverse ReactionsIdentified risks that require further evaluationPotential risks that require further evaluationPresentation of risk dataIdentified and Potential Interactions Epidemiology Pharmacological Class Effects Additional EU Requirements Potential for overdose Potential for transmission of infectious agentsPotential for misuse for illegal purposesPotential for off-label use Potential for off-label paediatric use

  41. Risk Management Plan Purpose Assessing risks by focused evaluation to close gaps in knowledge systematically (PM commitments - continued development - targeted populations) - looking for potential risks (class effects) - following observed events - characterizing outcomes that are mulifactorial Advance planning and communication of evaluation for new products Method Integration of incremental data acquisition starting in development, systemizing postmarketing commitments and new indication projects for the newly released compound Continued integration of all available data requires start at phase 1

  42. Limitations of human safetydatabase Table x: Exposure by baseline disease No of patients Total ( male/female ) Diabetic nephropathy 65 (39/26) Hypertensivenephropathy 71 ( 47/24) Glomerulonephritis 207 (143/64) Other 246 (140/106) Table y: Special population exposure Number of patients Population Children (<12 years) None Elderly (>75 years) 14 Pregnant or lactatingwomen None • Relevant co-morbidities • Hepatic impairment • Cardiac disease 57 243 …. Genetic polymorphism Not applicable • Ethnic origin • Caucasian • other 584 5

  43. Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) Clearly a serious and important risk

  44. Risk Minimisation “Tool Kit” • Based on Specification • Focus on practical ways to reduce risk to the population - SPC and labelling – population, indication(s), warnings, contradictions and monitoring - Communication to healthcare professionals and the public both pre and post launch, including letters, advertisements and educational programmes - Control of distribution or prescribing - Treatment protocols

  45. Risk Mitigation How to bring the risk profile to the prescriber and the patient • Routine label activities • Outside communication (DDL, Training) • Tests associated with precriptions • Market withdrawal Drugs can safely stay in the market by targeting the right patient groups through a coordinated safety and marketing strategy where revenue expectations that are consistent with what the safety profile supports Good decision making in drug lifecycle management must be the objective of strategic pharmacovigilance in implementing the recognized risk/benefit

  46. Risk Management Strategies • Reduce drug exposure - restrict indication - controlled drug distribution - optimise dosage regimen • Modify ADR occurrence - screen patients at baseline - monitor precursors (signs & symptoms) - educate prescribers and patients - ask for informed consent - introduce independent patient monitoring - provide hotlines for medical advice

  47. Safety Communications - A Patient Perspective “Wonder Pills” Sir, My wife has been prescribed pills. According to the accompanying leaflet, possible side-effects are: sickness, diarrhoea, indigestion, loss of appetite, belching, vertigo, abdominal cramps, dizziness, stomach ulcers, bleeding from intestine or blood diarrhoea, ulcerative colitis, sore mouth and tongue, constipation, back pains, inflammation of pancreas, mouth ulcers, skin rashes, hair loss, sensitivity to sunlight, drowsiness, tiredness, impaired hearing, difficulty with sleeping, seizures, irritability, anxiety, depression, mood changes, tremor, memory disturbances, disorientation, changes in vision, ringing in ears, bad dreams, taste alteration, allergic reactions, swelling due to water retention, palpitations, impotence or tightness of the chest. Should she take them? Yours faithfully, A D. O, Hertfordshire. Letter to the Editor,1996 Information withheld due to data privacy

More Related