1 / 16

Advances in Event-Related fMRI Experimental Design

Advances in Event-Related fMRI Experimental Design. Douglas N. Greve. Design Parameters. TR – time between volume acquisition (temporal resolution). Ntp – number of time points (TRs, frames, volumes, …) Nc – number of event types (conditions)

odette
Télécharger la présentation

Advances in Event-Related fMRI Experimental Design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Advances in Event-Related fMRI Experimental Design Douglas N. Greve

  2. Design Parameters • TR – time between volume acquisition (temporal resolution). • Ntp – number of time points (TRs, frames, volumes, …) • Nc – number of event types (conditions) • Npc – number of events/repetitions of each event type (can vary across event types) • Tpc – duration of each event type (can vary across event types) • Schedule – event onset time and identity • Event Response Model

  3. Outline • What is Event-Related Design? • Blocked Design • Fixed-Interval Event-Related • Rapid-Presentation (Jittered) Event-Related • Efficiency and Event Scheduling http:/surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/optseq

  4. Fact of (fMRI) Life #1: Dispersion • How closely can trials/events be spaced?

  5. Fact of (fMRI) Life #2: Noise • How much data needs to be collected?

  6. Fact of (fMRI) Life #3: Time • Collect lots of observations to reduce noise • Time is Money • Subjects won’t work forever

  7. Blocked Design 20-60 sec 20-60 sec fixation • Consecutive, rapid presentation for long duration. • Use overlap to build a larger signal. • Simple analysis. • Optimal for detection.

  8. Using Overlap to Increase Amplitude 1 2 3

  9. Blocked Design Drawbacks • Lose ability to distinguish individual responses • Confounding psychological and physiological effects • Habituation/Adaptation • Expectation • Set (Strategy) • Reminder: efficient.

  10. What is Event-Related Design? (c.f. Blocked Design) • Measure Average Response to Single Event Type • Post Hoc Event Assignment based on Subject’s Response • Random Order of Events • Historical: EEG/Evoked Potentials • Less Powerful than Blocked

  11. Fixed-Interval Event-Related 12-20s • Push trials apart enough to prevent overlap. • Interval fixed at minimum is most efficient. • Random Sequence (Counter-balanced) • Allows Post-Hoc Stimulus Definition • Mitigates Habituation, Expectation (?), and Set • Inflexible/Inefficient/Boring • Good if limited by number of stimuli (not scanning time)

  12. Rapid-Presentation Event-Related • Closely Spaced Trials (Overlap!) • Raw signal uninterpretable • More Stimulus Presentations for given scanning interval • Random Sequence • Jitter = “Random” Inter-Stimulus Interval (ISI/SOA) • Linearity Assumption

  13. Where does jitter come from?(What’s a Null Condition?) • “Null” condition – fixation cross or dot • By hypothesis, no response to null • Insert random amounts of null between task conditions • Differential ISI = Differential Overlap A + B A + A B A + + B + B A Time

  14. Rapid-Presentation Properties • Efficient (not as efficient as blocked) • Can distinguish responses despite overlap • Highly resistant to habituation, set, and expectation • Flexible timing (Behavioral, EEG, MEG) • Linear overlap assumption • Analysis: Selective Averaging/Deconvolution (GLM) • How to schedule stimulus onsets?

  15. A: N=5 B: N=10 Scheduling and Efficiency C: N=10 • Efficiency: statistical power/SNR/CNR per acquisition • Efficiency increases with N • Efficiency decreases with overlap • Efficiency increases with differential overlap • Choose schedule with optimum efficiency before scanning

  16. Summary • Facts of Life: Dispersion, Noise, Time • Blocked - Habituation, Expectation, Set, No Post-Hoc • Fixed-Interval Event-Related – Inefficient/Boring • Rapid-Presentation Event-Related • Randomized inter-stimulus onsets • Overlap Linearity • Efficient - Optimization Tool • Identical designs for Behavioral, fMRI, EEG, and MEG

More Related