1 / 22

Dynamically Variable Blade Geometry for Wind Energy

Dynamically Variable Blade Geometry for Wind Energy. Greg Meess , Michael Ross Dr. Ephrahim Garcia Laboratory for Intelligent Machine Systems. AIAA Regional Student Conference Boston University April 23-24 , 2010.

oksana
Télécharger la présentation

Dynamically Variable Blade Geometry for Wind Energy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dynamically Variable Blade Geometry for Wind Energy Greg Meess, Michael Ross Dr. Ephrahim Garcia Laboratory for Intelligent Machine Systems AIAA Regional Student Conference Boston University April 23-24, 2010

  2. Goal: Increase wind turbine energy output by morphing blade shape to match changing wind speeds. Pitch Chord Twist

  3. Outline • Motivation • Experimental Design • Airfoil Generation • Simulation • Optimization • Results • Geometry • Power output

  4. Motivation • Wind turbines are constantly increasing in size • Power output is proportional to rotor swept area • The largest turbines cannot be built on land • Blades are designed for higher wind speeds • Maximize rated power • Turbine spends little time operating at rated power • Little focus on low wind speeds • Variable Pitch

  5. Problem Parameterization • Blade Element Momentum (BEM) Theory is used • Turbine has operating regime between 4 m/s and 20 m/s • 4 m/s is lower limit of current turbines • Fixed speed generator of 60 rpm • Rotations vary from 30 to 120 rpm. • Rayleigh Distribution is used to assess annual power output • Chord, twist, and camber are examined Vestas V90 power output vs. wind speed Sample wind speed Rayleigh distribution

  6. Airfoil Generation • NACA XX12 Series • Leading edge, trailing edge follow NACA equations • Flexible panels connect to leading edge, rest on trailing edge • As chord extends/retracts, panels keep airfoil profile • XFOIL Simulation • CL, CDdata collected for angles of attack between -10° and 45° Emphasize Panels NACA 2412 original, fully extended, and fully retracted shapes Sample data from XFOIL for modified shapes

  7. Turbine Performance Analysis • Equations based on basic BEM theory, WT_Perf source code, and Aerodyne Theory Manual. • Blade divided into a number of elements • Axial induction factor initialized • a = (U1-U2)/U1 • Relative wind angle calculated from normal/tangential velocities • Lift/drag coefficients interpolated from airfoil data based on angle of attack • Axial induction factor updated • Iterate for conversion • Element torque/power calculated • Total power calculated Add stream tube picture • Polyamide Crazy airfoil cross section diagram Nylon “Kite Wing” Citations

  8. Parametric Study • Performance of morphing blades compared to that of a fixed blade • Sample blade from WT_Perf optimized across all parameters at wind speed of 10 m/s • All morphing blades begin with this shape • Each morphing blade changes one parameter • Three chord scenarios are examined • Extension only • Extension and retraction • Retraction only Add arrows

  9. Optimization

  10. Low Speed Shape Variable Pitch 15° High Speed Shape Morphology Plot

  11. Variable Camber Add picture Morphology Plot

  12. Annual Output Power Curve Highlight new lines

  13. Low Speed Shape Variable Chord Define retraction factor Emphasize retraction over others High Speed Shape Morphology Surface

  14. Highlight new lines

  15. Low Speed Shape Variable Twist High Speed Shape Morphology Surface

  16. Highlight new lines Clarification/vertical lines

  17. Conclusion • Variable Twist has the most influence on the performance • Consistent 5% improvement over current pitch control scheme • Achievable using torque tube mechanism • Shape distribution close to linear Cite “Fair”, “Good”,etc. Percent Improvement over Static Blade Emphasize improvement over pitch Find V-22 paper or illustration

  18. Future Work

  19. Acknowledgements Find official titles

  20. Questions & Comments? Laboratory for Intelligent Machine Systems Acknowledgements: Professor Sidney Leibovich, Donald Barry

More Related