1 / 30

Part 1: Have Pentaquark States been seen?

Part 1: Have Pentaquark States been seen?. New Hadrons: Facts and Fancy. Volker D Burkert Jefferson Lab. EINN 2005 – 19 - 20 September, Milos, Greece. LEPS. SAPHIR. This looks like a lot of evidence!. COSY-TOF. pp  S + Q + . The initial evidence for the Q +. CLAS-D. DIANA.

pennie
Télécharger la présentation

Part 1: Have Pentaquark States been seen?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Part 1: Have Pentaquark States been seen? New Hadrons: Facts and Fancy Volker D Burkert Jefferson Lab EINN 2005 – 19 - 20 September, Milos, Greece

  2. LEPS SAPHIR This looks like a lot of evidence! COSY-TOF pp  S+Q+. The initial evidence for the Q+ CLAS-D DIANA 4.4 5.2 4.8 4.6 CLAS-p Neutrino SVD HERMES 7.8 6.7 5.6 ~5 K+N ->X ZEUS ~5 4.6 3

  3. FOCUS FOCUS HERA-B HyperCP SPHINX + more CDF CDF CDF Non-evidence for Pentaquarks BABAR BES X-- DELPHI X-- Q0c

  4. U. Meissner The Q+ width • Measured width dominated by • experimental resolution • Analysis of K+A data give limit of few MeV. K+D -> X U. Meissner K+D , K+Xe X Sibirtsev et al.: GQ < 1 MeV • Very narrow for a hadronically • decaying particle with mass ~100 MeV • above threshold: • Q+(1540) -> nK+, pK0 From selected data sample • What can we say about event rates? K+n -> Q+ =>G~1MeV, K-p -> L* => G~16 MeV. s(Q+)/s(L*) ~ 1.4% for formation. GQ = 0.9 +/-0.3 MeV W. Gibbs, Phys.Rev.C70, 054208 (2004)

  5. Are the results on Q+ consistent? Low energy – effective degrees of freedom, meson-baryon coupling High energy – quark degrees of freedom, fragmentation • Can the “positive” low statistics results be reproduced with high statistics, e.g. LEPS, CLAS_d, CLAS_p, SAPHIR, COSY, HERMES,..? • Is fragmentation at high energy an efficient way of generating pentaquarks? Why do some experiment (ZEUS, HERMES, SVD) see a signal while others don’t?

  6. Pentaquark talks at Workshop • C. Alexandrou - Pentaquarks on the Lattice • Paul Stoler - Searches for Pentaquarks on proton targets at JLab • R. Mizuk - Limit of the Q+ width from KN scattering at Belle • S. Niccolai - Searches for Pentaquark baryons on deuterium with CLAS • N. Muramatsu - Studies of Q+ with LEPS at SPring8 • A. Geiser - Study of Q+ and other Pentaquark searches at HERA • J. M. Izen - Search for Pentaquark baryons at BaBaR • S. Kabana - Search for exotic baryons at RHIC • U. Meissner - What do we know about the width of Q+ ? • Discussion - Where are we and what to do next in the Pentaquark search?

  7. C. Alexandrou Takahashi et al., Pentaquark04 and hep-lat/0503019 :JKN and J’KN on spatial lattice size ~1.4, 1.7, 2.0 and 2.7 with a larger number of configurations

  8. C. Alexandrou Summary of LQCD

  9. Counts/4 MeV preliminary M(nK+)(GeV) Paul Stoler: Upper limit on the Q+ cross section (95%c.l.) s g p Q+ K0< 1.25 nb @ 1.54 GeV/c2 CLAS: gp -> K-K0n Fit with a sum of smooth function and a Gaussian with fix width and centroid. g K0 Results put stringent limits on possible production mechanism, e.g. implies very small coupling to K* K* n p Q+ K+

  10. P Stoler: Comparison with SAPHIR results SAPHIR Observed Yields SAPHIR N(Q+)/N(L*) ~ 10% CLAS N(Q+)/N(L*) < 0.2% (95%CL) Cross Sections SAPHIR sg p Q+ K0 ~ 300 nb reanalysis 50 nb (unpublished) CLAS sg p Q+ K0 < 2 nb Counts Counts cosqCM(K0) > 0.5 cosqCM(K0) > 0.5 M(nK0) (GeV) M(nK+) (GeV) g11@CLAS Counts Counts L(1520) cosqCM(K0) > 0.5 preliminary cosqCM(K0) > 0.5 Q+(1540) ? M(nK0) (GeV) M(nK+) (GeV)

  11. + - ® γD K p K n • The new data show no signal • Set upper limit on cross section < 450pb • Upper limit on elementary cross section: nosignal g n -> Q+K- sQ+ < 4-5 nb (95% CL) model dependent. Silvia Niccolai Upper limit on Q+ production with CLAS. G10 G2 Background from G10 • In previous result the background is underestimated. New estimate of the original data gives a significance of ~3s, possibly due to fluctuations.

  12. Upper limit onGQ+from CLAS Results Theoretical cross section are forGQ+=1 MeV ( ) – with K* exchange

  13. Old and New Signal from LEPS/SPring8 N. Muramatsu gD -> K-X • Mix K＋, K－,  from different events in LH2 data. • (1520) contribution was removed from the sample. ＋ (1520) preliminary preliminary MMC(γ,K＋) GeV/c2 MMC(γ,K－) GeV/c2

  14. K-p missing mass spectrum N. Muramatsu * fitted in MM<1.52 GeV/c2 ~5σ excess at 1.53 GeV/c2 corresponding + 1.6 GeV bump was also seen. + preliminary 1.6 GeV bump Counts/5 MeV preliminary Counts/5 MeV * from sidebands MMd(γ,K－p) GeV/c2 MMd(γ,K－p) GeV/c2 Signal emerges with selection of L*(1520) in M(K-p)

  15. M(GeV) Pentaquark Studies at HERA A. Geiser ep -> eK0spX High energy production mechanism? ZEUS => Signal seen at medium Q2 and forward rapidity in both pKs and pKs

  16. ZEUS – Cross section onQ+ A. Geiser M(GeV) Q+/L* ~ 5% (independent of Q2)

  17. Baryon fragmentation s s u u Q+ d d d q Needs fewer quark pairs from the vacuum e Pentaquark less suppressed ? Pentaquark in fragmentation? Quark fragmentation u u d q Q+ e Pentaquark strongly suppressed ?

  18. K+ Q+ n BELLE – Low energy K+N scattering R. Mizuk e+e--> K+/- X, K+/-A -> pK0, pK- Detector Tomography momentum spectra of K+ and K- 1 / 50MeV momentum, GeV/c Momentum range possibly contributing to Q+ formation. =>Determine resonance width

  19. NΘ+ Nch σch 107mb Bi Bf ΓΘ+= Δm R. Mizuk Belle – Limit on Q+ Width GQ+ from K+A -> pK0sX & K+D -> inclusive analysis K+A -> pK0s Belle limit 90%CL 397 fb-1 DIANA No no signal Belle: G < 0.64 MeV (90% CL) @ M = 1.539 GeV G< 1 MeV (90% CL) @ M = 1.525–1.545 GeV Cahn,Trilling,PRD69,11501 (2004). Not inconsistent with previous results.

  20. Upper limit on cross section ratio σ(KNΘ(1540)+X) σ(KNΛ(1520)X) B(Λ(1520) pK-) B(Θ(1540)+  pK0) B(K0 KS π+π-) NΘ+ NΛ* εpK+ εpKs = <2.5% at the 90% C.L. εpKs/εpK+ from MC assuming that Θ+ and Λ(1520) kinematics is similar. Comparison with other experiments Consistent with <1 MeV width. ?

  21. Slope: Pseudoscalar mesons: ~ 10-2/GeV/c2 (need to generate one qq pair) Slope for p.s. mesons Slope for baryons Slope for Pentaquark ? Q+ + Q- X- - +X++ Hadron production in e+e- collisions J.M. Izen Baryons: ~ 10-4 /GeV/c2 (generate two pairs) Pentaquarks: ~ 10-8 /GeV/c2 (?) (generate four pairs) G= 1Mev G= 1MeV BR(X-- X-p-)=0.5

  22. BaBar Preliminary233 fb–1 e+e– data Tomography with pKs0 Vertices -0.2 < y < 0.7 cm -3.1< x < -2.2 cm Ta Be Ta Y [cm] Y [cm] Vetobeamspot R  2 cm e+ e– SVT X [cm] X [cm] SVT support tube DCH inner wall Beampipe z profile

  23. Preliminary233 fb–1 e+e– data e-Be Electroproduction ZEUS (e-pe-KS0p + X) ZEUS *(1480) Zeus: ~5 M=15223 MeV Hermes: ~5 M=15283 MeV (quasi-real photoproduction) HERMES (e+dKS0p + X) HERMES HERMES/BaBaR comparison disturbing. ZEUS : High Q2, no signal for Q2<1 BaBaR: Quasi-real photons HERMES: acceptance loss in low mass region? (PID requires p(p) >4.1 GeV/c; p(KS0)>3 GeV/c)

  24. STAR d-Au results Q D pK+ and pK- from 18.6 M d+Au at 200 GeV S. Kabana Possible mechanism for production of multi-q/g states: Coalescence of out of QGP? STAR Preliminary ? M (GeV/c2) A Q++ candidate ? Also a Q+ candidate ??

  25. M = 1523 MeV s = 12 MeV Nevnt = 165 Private info from SVD group SVD-2 – New Analysis Two independent data set: KS decays inside or outside the Vertex Detector Ep = 70 GeV M = 1522 MeV s = 12 MeV Nevnt = 205 • New analysis improves Q+ signal by factor 8. The results maybe in conflict with new WA89 results (to be published shortly).

  26. pp-> pXX gA FOCUS < 0.0025/B range Cascade Pentaquark X5--(1862) ? HERA-B CDF • State not produced in quark fragmentation or is severely suppressed. gA FOCUS

  27. Charmed PentaquarkQ0c(3100) ? FOCUS H1 expected FOCUS events H1 expected FOCUS events • Upper limit factor 4 lower than H1 results. Claim is that results are incompatible with H1. • Signal also in photo- production • Claim kinematical uniqueness. • Possible production mechanism - PGF. • FOCUS experiment claims incompatibility with H1.

  28. s/ b+s G11 CLAS-p G10 CLAS-d HERA-B, CDF, COMPASS ZEUS, FOCUS, BABAR Pentaquark Status @ EINN 2005 Group Signal Backgr. Significance publ.Comments ---------------------------------------------------------------------- SPring8 19 17 4.6s 3.2s SPring8 90 260 4.8s SAPHIR 55 56 4.8s 5.2s DIANA 29 44 4.4s 3.4s CLAS(d) 43 54 5.2s 4.4s CLAS(p) 41 35 7.8s 4.7s 18 9 6.7 3.5s HERMES 51 150 4.3-6.2 3.6s ZEUS 230 1080 4.6 6.4s COSY 57 95 4-6 4.7s SVD 41 87 5.6 3.6s SVD-2 370 2000 7.5s Improved analysis NA49 38 43 4.2 4.2s H1 50.6 51.7 5-6 5.0s SPring8 80 200 4.8s L*(K+n) STAR 2,250 150,000 3.5-5sQ++candidate ? BELLE Q+ ? BABAR X5 Q0c

  29. Concluding comments Q+(1540) • Two high statistics experiments on protons and deuterium (CLAS) contradict results that observed ~5s signals with same kinematics. • Within hadronic models the new CLAS results put limits on the widths. For most models GQ+ < 0.5 MeV. New limit from Belle not (yet?) in contradiction with 1 MeV limit. Increase in statistics could change that. • Need to examine if gD and gA experiments with lower statistics are consistent with CLAS cross section limit on neutrons . • Sensitivity to Q+ at high energy appears in baryon fragmentation not in quark fragmentation. This could explain some of the null results at high energies. • Babar is challenging the HERMES results on Q+. • New data/analysis from LEPS, SVD-2, and STAR, support Q observations.

  30. Outlook • TheQ pentaquarkis not in good health, but itis • still alive. • - new analyses underway from COSY, SVD-2, SPring8 • - measurements planned at SPring8, JLab • - H1, ZEUS, HERMES high luminosity run until 2007 • - higher statistics data from STAR, PHENIX • - more statistics and analyses from B-factories • Should the Q pentaquark not survive the next few years of intense scrutiny we will have to examine why so many experiments observed the signal in the first place.

More Related