1 / 9

Steering Committee Meeting

Steering Committee Meeting. Quality Control Committee Report February 8 th , 2007. Overview. Exam 4 Quality Control Surveillance Additional Investigations. Exam 4 QC Committee Surveillance. Clinic Anthropometry measures (intra- and inter-technician)

pmorrison
Télécharger la présentation

Steering Committee Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Steering Committee Meeting Quality Control Committee Report February 8th, 2007

  2. Overview • Exam 4 Quality Control Surveillance • Additional Investigations

  3. Exam 4 QC Committee Surveillance • Clinic • Anthropometry measures (intra- and inter-technician) • Form data mean, variance, outliers (BP and anthro) • Interviewer protocol adherence • CT • Blind rereads (intra- and inter-reader) • Torso phantom monitoring • Protocol Violations • Laboratory • Blind duplicate assays (group 1) • Ancillary Studies (Family, Lung, MRI, …)

  4. Additional Investigations • Drift in Fasting Glucose • Drift in Urinary Creatinine and Albumin • MESA Family Ultrasound comparability • EBCT and 64 Slice MDCT comparability • Cardiac MRI Field Center differences

  5. Fasting Glucose Drift • Tracy Investigative Subcommittee formed 9/07 • Recommendation to sample 800 specimens • 200 from each of the 4 exams • stratified by Exam quarter (50 each) • and stratified by glucose quintile (10 each). • Assay results transmitted to CC last week. • Report initiated and scheduled for release to Tracy Investigative Committee on 2/13/07.

  6. MRI Center Differences Linear regression Number of obs = 5000 F( 15, 4984) = 446.81 Prob > F = 0.0000 R-squared = 0.5964 Root MSE = 25.141 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Robust olvedm1 | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------­+---------------------------------------------------------------- 4: COL | 12.72629 1.423397 8.94 0.000 9.935803 15.51677 5: JHU | 2.613263 1.378837 1.90 0.058 -.0898654 5.316391 6: UMN | 18.06299 1.380556 13.08 0.000 15.35649 20.76949 7: NWU | 9.425192 1.291795 7.30 0.000 6.892705 11.95768 8: UCLA | 5.455308 1.496009 3.65 0.000 2.522471 8.388145 age1c | -.3233225 .0470374 -6.87 0.000 -.4155365 -.2311085 wtlb1 | .3754949 .0142763 26.30 0.000 .3475071 .4034827 htcm1 | .6318455 .0641437 9.85 0.000 .5060957 .7575953 gender1 | 29.12208 1.170361 24.88 0.000 26.82766 31.41651 race1c_2 | -1.979374 1.342958 -1.47 0.141 -4.612163 .653415 race1c_3 | 8.72663 1.040092 8.39 0.000 6.687593 10.76567 race1c_4 | 2.444399 1.221481 2.00 0.045 .049759 4.83904 sbp1c | .4466735 .0299493 14.91 0.000 .3879597 .5053874 dbp1c | -.1421031 .0598686 -2.37 0.018 -.259472 -.0247343 htnmed1c | 5.490219 .8400984 6.54 0.000 3.843256 7.137181 _cons | -75.88663 11.03512 -6.88 0.000 -97.52033 -54.25293 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  7. MRI Center Differences • After adjustment for common risk factors, there appears to be a significant Field Center effect on End Diastolic Mass (on average UMN LV Mass measures are 18 grams more than WFU, JHU LVMass is 2.6 grams more than WFU …). • Pairwise differences between all Field Centers are believed to be statistically significant. • Regressions of LV Mass Index (weight and height adjusted variant) produce similar results. • Effects also apparent for: • End Diastolic Volume • End Systolic Volume • Stroke Volume • Ejection Fraction • Cardiac Output

  8. Routine Investigation • No evidence for • Time trends • Image quality effect • Protocol adherence effect • Technician effect • Manufacturer effect (GE vs Siemens)

  9. CT LV Size Adjustment Linear regression Number of obs = 5000 F( 16, 4983) = 657.68 Prob > F = 0.0000 R-squared = 0.7310 Root MSE = 20.525 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Robust olvedm1 | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- 4: COL | -1.062079 1.160226 -0.92 0.360 -3.336633 1.212476 5: JHU | -1.25548 1.096965 -1.14 0.252 -3.406015 .8950548 6: UMN | 16.16367 1.127796 14.33 0.000 13.95269 18.37464 7: NWU | -.8253703 1.068237 -0.77 0.440 -2.919586 1.268845 8: UCLA | -4.030186 1.154943 -3.49 0.000 -6.294381 -1.76599 age1c | .1871892 .0397874 4.70 0.000 .1091883 .2651901 wtlb1 | .2996125 .0120323 24.90 0.000 .2760238 .3232011 htcm1 | -.1952002 .058762 -3.32 0.001 -.3103996 -.0800009 gender1 | 19.25727 .8976507 21.45 0.000 17.49748 21.01706 _Irace1c_2 | -1.119526 1.093914 -1.02 0.306 -3.264079 1.025027 _Irace1c_3 | 4.665182 .831245 5.61 0.000 3.035576 6.294788 _Irace1c_4 | 1.596157 .9849146 1.62 0.105 -.3347087 3.527024 sbp1c | .1749503 .0240008 7.29 0.000 .1278981 .2220025 dbp1c | .1621186 .047622 3.40 0.001 .0687586 .2554786 htnmed1c | 3.787789 .6741172 5.62 0.000 2.466222 5.109355 lvs | .3632597 .0105439 34.45 0.000 .342589 .3839304 _cons | .4006381 9.054353 0.04 0.965 -17.34988 18.15116 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More Related