SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Efficient Management Strategies for Research Projects at Universities

pooky avatar
9 diapositives · 212 Views · Sep 22, 2014

Explore the management structure and practices at the University of California for cost-reimbursement contracts, weekly project meetings, and reporting procedures. Learn about the Skunk Works approach and benefits of this project management style.

Efficient Management Strategies for Research Projects at Universities - slide 1
01 / 9Efficient Management Strategies for Research Projects at Universities
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Efficient Management Strategies for Research Projects at Universities
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. ISUAL Programmatic Issues H. Heetderks

  2. ISUAL Management Structure • The University of California is a non-profit institution which does not financially support research activities • Very low overhead rate supports only buildings, utilities, part of purchasing cost, etc. • Personnel structure provides pay scales, compliance to FAR’s, benefits, etc. • The University accepts only cost reimbursement contracts • Requires careful management of Project to avoid creeping requirements • Programs at SSL are run using a management system which combines elements of both Project Oriented and Matrix Organizations NCKU UCB Tohoku ISUAL Progammatics H. Heetderks

  3. ISUAL Management Structure (con’t) • Programs are typically run using a dedicated “Skunk Works” Project Structure organized around the Principal Investigator • Characterized by a small group of scientists and engineers who stay with the project from start to finish • Requires a high degree of versatility on the part of the engineering staff • The same person will perform design, analysis, fabrication oversight, and testing, as the project moves from proposal through launch • A given staff member may fill a number of different boxes on the organization chart • Advantages of the Skunk Works approach • Greatly facilitates communication among project personnel • Provides a more interesting work place which attracts higher quality people • Reduces cost NCKU UCB Tohoku ISUAL Progammatics H. Heetderks

  4. ISUAL Weekly Project Meeting • Meeting held every Wednesday at 10:00 am with all responsible group members attending • Schedule Review by Project Manager • Technical Reports by Sub-System Managers • Review of Procurement Status • Planning of following Week’s Activities • Review of Product Assurance Issues NCKU UCB Tohoku ISUAL Progammatics H. Heetderks

  5. Regular Telecon with NSPO Project Manager One to Five Times per Week; Issues addressed include: • Contractual / Budget • Technical • Interface • Instrument Performance • Schedule NCKU UCB Tohoku ISUAL Progammatics H. Heetderks

  6. Reporting • Monthly Financial Reports • Gives cost to date • Shows funds remaining in Contract • Quarterly Progress Reports • Review of Technical Progress • Conducted by UCB PM and NSPO Resident Engineer • Informal discussion using engineering drawings • Minutes taken by NSPO Representative NCKU UCB Tohoku ISUAL Progammatics H. Heetderks

  7. ISUAL Organization Chart NCKU UCB Tohoku ISUAL Progammatics H. Heetderks

  8. ISUAL Manpower Plan NCKU UCB Tohoku ISUAL Progammatics H. Heetderks

  9. Matra-Marconi TAA • Draft TAA submitted for approval on 6 March, 2000 • TAA’s for NSPO and Tohoku were approved 4 months after submission • Based on this, we expect a response in early July, 2000 • The responsible office of the State Department, the ODTC, moved from Virginia to Washington DC after the submission • Repeated inquiries to the ODTC have gone unanswered NCKU UCB Tohoku ISUAL Progammatics H. Heetderks