1 / 7

Exploring Ethics in Practice: A Symposium on Dialogue and Inquiry

This symposium, held on April 18, 2013, highlights the progress of ethics in practice, featuring notable presentations and deep discussions. Led by Sarah Banks, the event includes insights from experts like Ed de Jonge, Ana Marija Soboca, Kirsten Nohr, François Gillet, and Richard Anthone. With an emphasis on Socratic dialogue, participants explore crucial questions about moral values, decision-making, and the responsibility of social workers. Attendees are encouraged to engage attentively, think collaboratively, and develop a richer understanding of ethics in practice.

rachel
Télécharger la présentation

Exploring Ethics in Practice: A Symposium on Dialogue and Inquiry

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FESET – ESEP symposiumEthics in progress: from teaching topractice Program 18 april 2013

  2. Introductionandremembrance of Anne Liebingby Sarah Banks (5 min.) • Short introductionabout ESEP By Kirsten Nohr (5 min.) • Introduction of the symposium – elaborationabout the program by Richard Anthone (10 minutes) • Presentation of Sarah Banks (15 min.) • Collectingquestions (5 min.) • Presentation of Ed de Jonge • Collectingquestions (5 min.) • Socraticdialogue Break • Presentation of Ana MarijaSoboca (15 min.) • Collectingquestions (5 min.) • Presentation of Kirsten Nohr • Collectingquestions (5 min.) • Presentation of François Gillet • Collectingquestions (5 min.) • Presentation of Richard Anthone • Collectingquestions (5 min.) • Socraticdialogue Finish

  3. Working criteria

  4. Criteria for a gooddialogue • Take your time. A dialogue is a form of slow thinking, focused on depth. • Listen carefully. Ask questions. Transfer your thinking into the thinking of the other. Take a look at the world through the eyes of the other. • There is no need for an immediate decision. Understanding and understanding each other's ideas is sufficient. • Don't think as in an opposition to others (‘Yes, but '). Think with the others, think together as a single head ("Yes, and"). • Don’t get obsessed with finding solutions. Investigate the underlying reasons, values, or visions of a problem or a solution. • Make room for new thinking. Go beyond your old thinking.

  5. Criteria forgoodquestions • A good question contains a verb. Somethingyou do • A good question contains a concept toinvestigate, explore • The verbstimulates the process of inquiry • A good question is answerable = youanfindexamples • A good question creates commitment, the desiretoinvestigate.

  6. Examples • Can a good person be boring? • Can desires be educated? • Should social workers live exemplary? • Canyoulietoyourself? • Is unconditonal help possible? • Is caringforyourselfequaltocaringforanother • Is itallowedtointerferewithsomebodyelse life? • Is the connectionbetweenfreedomandresponsabilitynecessary? • Whathelpsyouto make goodchoices? • How do youdecidewhat is goodforyou?

  7. Aboutansweringquestions • Trytofindexampleswhich are factualandexperienced • Trytoconnect the answerto the question. • When an answer does not raise any further question then the answer is satisfactory and complete • When an answer is not subject of any possible counter-example, contradiction or exception then the answer is complete

More Related