1 / 29

On recent developments of ‘Diversity’

On recent developments of ‘Diversity’. Prof. Dr. Steven Vertovec Max-Planck-Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity. On recent developments of ‘Diversity. Diversity is not what it used to be : changing social and political configurations

raven-booth
Télécharger la présentation

On recent developments of ‘Diversity’

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. On recent developments of ‘Diversity’ Prof. Dr. Steven Vertovec Max-Planck-Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity

  2. On recent developments of ‘Diversity • Diversity is not what it used to be: changing social and political configurations • ‘Diversity’ is diverse: changing public discourse III. Diversity of ‘diversity’: how and why IV. Conclusion

  3. I. ‘Diversity is not what it used to be’ Over last 30 years or so, actual social and political configurations have changed considerably; therefore, need to re-think (in social science & public policy) concepts and approaches • From (so-conceived) population segments based on class, region, and especially, large ethnic minority groups • To far more complex, multiple, cross-cutting, self-identified/mobilized categories of ‘difference’

  4. I. ‘Diversity is not what it used to be’ Ia. Immigration and ‘Super-diversity’ Recent global migration patterns: (A)‘Diversification of diversity’ 1950s-70s large numbers from a few places to a few places 1980s-now small numbers from many places to many places (B) Variation in flows (by gender, human capital, age, space…) (C) Complexification of migration channels / legal statuses

  5. Observations in UK Iran Somalia Albania

  6. Super-diversity: Germany Germany, in-migration 2006 Germany, Ausländer 1970

  7. [restricted] Migrant legal categories [unrestricted] [deportable] [application pending] [temporary]

  8. Frankfurt 2008

  9. I. ‘Diversity is not what it used to be’ Ib. ‘Pluralization of society’Identity Politics / Movements Especially since 1970s, following civil rights movement • Social mobilization around discriminated collective identities based on race/ethnicity, religion, gender, sexuality, disability, age [categories claimed as ‘intrinsic’?] • ‘In their wake, identity politics has become a fixture on the political landscape’ (Kenny The Politics of Identity 2004: 3)

  10. Eurobarometer 2007

  11. Köppel, Yan & Lüdicke 2007:Cultural Diversity Management in Deutschland hinkt hinterher • „Dies heißt, jedes Unternehmen ist gefordert, nach dem jeweiligen nationalen Rahmen sowie der lokalen Gesellschaft ein bedarfs-gerechtes Konzept von Diversity Management zu entwickeln.“

  12. I. ‘Diversity is not what it used to be’ Ic. Combined Anti-discrimination EC AmsterdamTreaty 1997 - Article 13 • ‘Article 13 represented a quantum leap forward in the fight against discrimination at EU level in that it empowered the Community to take action to deal with discrimination on a whole new range of grounds, including racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, age, disability and sexual orientation.’ • ‘…provides a more effective basis for addressing situations of multiple discrimination’ – EC Green Paper 2004, p.5

  13. UK – since October 2007 • Merger of Equal Opportunities Commission, the Commission for Racial Equality and the Disability Rights Commission • For ‘upholding both human rights and tackling discrimination against women, ethnic minorities, the disabled or on grounds of religion, age or sexual orientation.’ • Patricia Hewitt, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry: “As individuals, our identities are diverse and complex. People don't define themselves as just a woman, or black or gay and neither should our equality organisations. People and their problems should not be put in boxes.” -“multiculturalism had had its day because people now had multiple identities”

  14. Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz (AGG) [Antidiskriminierungsgesetz ] 2006 • „Ziel des Gesetzes ist es, rassistische Diskriminierungen oder jene, die wegen der ethnischen Herkunft, des Geschlechts, der Religion oder Weltanschauung, einer Behinderung, des Alters oder der sexuellen Identität erfolgt sind, zu verhindern oder zu beseitigen. „ (§ 1 AGG)

  15. II. ‘Diversity’ is diverse A common conceptual rubric – ‘diversity’ – and a related set of discourses has arisen to single-handedly grasp and address the emergent social and political configurations • Not surprisingly, ‘diversity’ has come to mean a variety of things in a variety of quarters

  16. Public discourse today parallel to situation in early 1990sMulticulturalism was everywhere… • Multicultural Mathematics (1993) • Medical Practice in a Multicultural Society (1988) • Dance: A Multicultural Perspective (1986) • Multicultural Pharmaceutical Education (1993) • Counselling and Psychotherapy: A Multicultural Perspective (1993) • Managing Substance Abuse in a Multicultural Society (1994) • Marginality: The Key to Multicultural Theology (1995) • Marketing in a Multicultural World (1995) • Multiculturalism: Criminal Law (1991) • Multicultural Public Relations (1995) • Multicultural Manners: New Rules of Etiquette (1995)

  17. Since early 2000s… • Ubiquitous public criticism of (presumed) ‘Multiculturalism’ • Leading to death of ‘M-word’ - But not retraction of policies • ‘Integration’ is now key word - But not ‘assimilationist’ because strongly linked with ‘Diversity’

  18. By 2009Diversity is everywhere • Understanding and Managing Diversity (2008) • The Diversity Scorecard: Evaluating the Impact of Diversity on Organizational Performance (2003) • Global Diversity: Winning Customers and Engaging Employees Within World Markets (2006) • Cultivating Diversity in Fundraising (2001) • Diversity, Oppression, Change: Culturally Grounded Social Work (2008) • Drama and Diversity (2000) • Diversity in Counseling (2003) • Diversity and the Recreation Profession (2008) • Diversity in Early Care and Education(2007) • Cultural Diversity in Health and Illness (2008) • Intentional Diversity: Creating Cross-Cultural Relationships in Your Church (2002) • Cultural Diversity: A Primer for the Human Services (2006)

  19. II. ‘Diversity’ is diverse ‘Diversity’ and Business

  20. 2008: Equality and Human Rights Commission, Trades Union Congress, Confederation of British Industry “The potential rewards of diversity are significant: an organisation that recruits its staff from the widest possible pool will unleash talent and develop better understanding of its customers. It will also enable it to spot market opportunities.”

  21. II. ‘Diversity’ is diverse Diversity and Public Institutions

  22. UNESCO World Report 2009 Cultural Diversity: ‘The meanings attached to this catch-all term are as varied as they are shifting.’ • ‘…a new approach to cultural diversity – one that takes account of its dynamic nature and the challenges of identity associated with the permanence of cultural change.’ • Shift from conservation of cultures • In light of ‘general trend towards the emergence of dynamic and multifaceted identities.’

  23. II. ‘Diversity’ is diverse ‘Vielfalt’…

  24. “Vielfalt statt Einfalt”

  25. II. ‘Diversity’ is diverse Süß & Kleiner 2005: Diversity-Management inDeutschland:Ergebnisse einer Unternehmensbefragung ‘Diversity’ and German Business

  26. III. Diversity of ‘Diversity’ discourse in policy & practice • ‘promoting Diversity’ display of visible difference as equal opportunities • ‘celebrating Diversity’ exhibit self-promoted cultural difference • ‘managing Diversity’ maximize positive potential value difference • ‘integration and Diversity’ immigrantdifference is good, but within limits

  27. III. Diversity of ‘Diversity’ Why/how shift to ‘diversity’? • Turn against group identities (as ‘Parallel Societies’) • Unwillingness to ‘essentialize’/stereotype group members • Turn toward individual difference(s) / ‘multiple identities’ • Individualization? Privatization? Neo-liberalism? • Economic/Political efficiency? (bunching differences) • Equalizing (trivializing?) all differences? • Tide of ‘Rightism’? (changing mode of public recognition) • Crass tokenism? Fear of lawsuits? (public expectations) • Social science re-tooling around complexity -- likely: unevenly combined influence of all of these…

  28. IV. Conclusion ‘Diversity’’s sheer ambivalence / multi-valence accounts greatly for its current success in public, business & academic discourse • “All things to all people” Flaws, vagueness, vogueness – yes But, in light of changing socio-cultural configurations, better to have such a term, policies & programmes than not to…

  29. Max-Planck-Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity Max-Planck-Institut zur Erforschung multireligiöser und multiethnischer Gesellschaften Hermann-Föge-Weg 11, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany tel. +49/0 551 4956-0, fax +49/0 551 4956-111 www.mmg.mpg.de

More Related