1 / 14

Scatter Cloud of the C-arm

C15. Scatter Cloud of the C-arm. Objective. Investigate the radiation scatter during C-arm fluoroscopic examinations Determine the best location for the radiographer to stand to achieve the lowest dose of radiation while performing radiographic procedures. Hypothesis.

robynr
Télécharger la présentation

Scatter Cloud of the C-arm

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. C15 Scatter Cloud of the C-arm

  2. Objective • Investigate the radiation scatter during C-arm fluoroscopic examinations • Determine the best location for the radiographer to stand to achieve the lowest dose of radiation while performing radiographic procedures

  3. Hypothesis • Radiation scatter cloud is non-uniformly distributed • Scatter radiation would be higher under the examination table

  4. “Scatter Cloud” • Quantifiable and reproducible radiation is created during fluoroscopic procedures • The outcome data resembles a “scatter cloud” • Room set up and imaging technique variables influence scatter radiation levels • Risk • Radiation doses can vary widely • Although radiation exposure is a necessary risk, protection of staff and patients require a clear understanding of how the exposure radiates • The risk cannot be eliminated entirely

  5. Method • Digital imaging of an acrylic adult abdominal CT phantom was exposed at both anteroposterior and lateral projections

  6. Method • Dosimeters were positioned at different heights and distances • Height from the floor: 2 feet, 3 feet, 4 feet, and 5 feet • Distance from isocenter: 3 feet and 6 feet

  7. Materials • OEC 9900 Elite C-arm • Acrylic Adult Abdominal CT Phantom • RaySafe™ i2 Dosimeters (4) and Software • IV Pole • Lead Aprons • Tape

  8. Dosimeter • RaySafe™ i2 dosomiters visualize X-ray exposure in real-time and displays exposure values • Provides instant feedback to permit radiology staff to adjust their behavior to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure • Measurements are simultaneously stored for analysis for furthering new behaviors and allowing comparisons over time

  9. The scatter cloud was most intense at the 2 foot and 3 foot levels • The measured values at the 4 foot and 5 foot levels diminished to almost nothing • The greatest intensity of radiation was recorded at the tube end of the plane that passed through the tube and control portions of the C-Arm Graph of C-Arm Scatter Cloud in AP Position Data *Due to physical limitations, measurements could not be taken at the 3-foot distance at the control end or the 5-foot distance at the image intensifier end in this orientation.

  10. Graph of C-Arm Scatter Cloud in Lateral Position Data • The dose rate of the scatter cloud was most intense at the 2 foot and 3 foot levels • The measured values at the 4 foot and 5 foot levels diminished to almost nothing • The greatest intensity was to the left and right of the emitter at a distance of 3 feet away *Room constraints prevented the placement of sensors at the 6-foot point on the tube end. The values for this position have been set to zero for graphing purposes.

  11. Discussion • The results of our measurements appear to support the hypothesis that the scatter cloud produced by the C-Arm is non-uniform • The intensity of the dose rate diminished greatly from the 6 foot to the 3 foot mark • As anticipated based on the inverse square law

  12. Discussion • Dose rate was reduced greatly past the 3 foot height mark • perhaps due to the construction of the C-Arm and the phantom used. • Dose rate was particularly high near the tube end in the lateral orientation • The non-uniform nature of the scatter cloud is important • Knowledge of the areas of greater dose rate can help radiation workers determine where to position themselves while the C-Arm is being used

  13. Conclusion • Our data and research indicates the best place for the radiographer to stand is behind the control end of the C-arm

  14. Resources • Haqqani, O. P., Agarwal, P. K., Halin, N. M., & Iafrati, M. D. (2013). Defining the radiation “scatter cloud” in the interventional suite. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 58(5), 1339-1345. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2013.01.025 • Kim, K. P., & Miller, D. L. (2009, February). Minimising radiation exposure to physicians performing fluoroscopically guided cardiac catheterisation procedures: A review. Retrieved March 07, 2019, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2902901/ • Manchikanti, L., Cash, K. A., Moss, T. L., Rivera, J., & Pampati, V. (2003, August 06). Risk of whole body radiation exposure and protective measures in fluoroscopically guided interventional techniques: A prospective evaluation. Retrieved March 07, 2019, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC194671/ • Mitchell, F. P. (n.d.). Prevention of radiation injury from medical imaging ... Retrieved March 07, 2019, from https://www.jvascsurg.org/article/S0741-5214(10)01731-3/fulltext • Software Used: • AutoCAD 2019 (Version P.46.0.0) [Computer software]. (n.d.). Retrieved March 22, 2019, from https://www.autodesk.com/products/autocad/overview • EZGIF Animated GIF editor and GIF maker. (n.d.). Retrieved March 22, 2019, from https://ezgif.com/ • Plot.ly. (n.d.). Retrieved March 22, 2019, from https://plot.ly/ Online Graphing Application

More Related