1 / 16

International Blended Learning: United States and Lebanon

International Blended Learning: United States and Lebanon. Judy Gerardi. Empire State College’s Center for International Programs:. Athens Thessaloniki Prague Lebanon. Two instructional models. Direct instruction Classes at partner institution Athens, Thessaloniki, Prague

rosieh
Télécharger la présentation

International Blended Learning: United States and Lebanon

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. International Blended Learning: United States and Lebanon Judy Gerardi Blended Learning US and Lebanon

  2. Empire State College’s Center for International Programs: • Athens • Thessaloniki • Prague • Lebanon Blended Learning US and Lebanon

  3. Two instructional models • Direct instruction Classes at partner institution Athens, Thessaloniki, Prague • Blended learning Online and F2F Lebanon Blended Learning US and Lebanon

  4. Blended Learning • Sloan-C definition of blended learning * • 1. Courses that integrate online with traditional f2f class activities in a planned, pedagogically valuable manner; and • 2. Where a portion (institutionally defined) of f2f time is replaced by online activity * Picciano & Dziuban, 2006 Blended Learning US and Lebanon

  5. Lebanese Residency Program Blend: Background • Considerations in design and delivery of program to students in Lebanon • Academic quality at a distance • Home faculty • Direct contact: residency • Ongoing contact: online Blended Learning US and Lebanon

  6. Lebanese Residency Program Blend: Design and Delivery • F2F: residencies at start and end of term • Online: webcourse • Proctored examinations in Lebanon Blended Learning US and Lebanon

  7. Pedagogical Considerations • Integrate f2f and online • Course goals drive blend • Temporal placement of f2f • Strengths of each format Blended Learning US and Lebanon

  8. College Teaching Strategies • Blended learning facilitates successful teaching strategies: • Active learning • Cooperative/collaborative learning • Questioning as teaching technique • Inquiry • Group discussion Blended Learning US and Lebanon

  9. Research Instrument • Survey designed • Survey distributed to Lebanese Residency Program faculty • Content analysis of faculty responses Blended Learning US and Lebanon

  10. Content Analysis: What does F2F add to the online component? • Behavioral cues; personal dimension • Lecture/overview. Definitions, key concepts • Model techniques: inquiry, analysis, specific learning activities • Familiar learning environment: makes the course “real” Blended Learning US and Lebanon

  11. Course Management • F2F • Course requirements reviewed • Flexibility: use student feedback to adjust course • Online • Pre-managed up front • Better control of course • Scheduling, convenience, access Blended Learning US and Lebanon

  12. Instructor Time and Effort • F2F • Explain and correct misunderstandings to whole group at once • Pressure to use limited time most effectively • Online • Can research student questions, provide better responses • Much time and effort in planning • Writing slower than talking Blended Learning US and Lebanon

  13. Assessment of Student Learning • F2F • Additional information about mastery of those students less engaged online • Online • More objective • Don’t know if it’s the student’s own work • All assessments based on writing skills Blended Learning US and Lebanon

  14. Pedagogy • F2f • Cover challenging topics • Motivation, establish interest • Adjust teaching to student cues • Online • Analysis, synthesis, feedback • Discussion more like lecture • Discussion more easily student led Blended Learning US and Lebanon

  15. Most Important F2F Contributions • Organizational 2 • Social 5 • Pedagogical 4 • Tallies. Respondents indicated which of the three aspects of f2f was most important to them. Blended Learning US and Lebanon

  16. Comments • Research encapsulates comparative strengths of f2f and online for all blended learning • Promising findings for adding f2f to webcourses • Provides direction for further research Blended Learning US and Lebanon

More Related