90 likes | 193 Vues
This presentation covers the simulation of NUSTAR crystals using the Litrani Monte Carlo program, designed for optical photon propagation in anisotropic media. Developed at CEA Saclay for various applications, Litrani allows for detailed modeling of scintillators like CsI(Tl) and PbWO4, examining properties such as light emission, absorption lengths, and reflectivity. We present preliminary results on light yield and energy resolution, comparing simulations with measurements. Insights into crystal geometry and detector response pave the way for refining simulation models.
E N D
Simulation of NUSTAR crystals with Litrani • Presentation of Litrani: simulation of optical photons • Preliminary results • Light yield • Interface with GEANT4 simulations Meeting at IPNO, Orsay, France
What is Litrani ? LITRANI stands for LIght TRansmission in ANIsotropic media. • General purpose Monte-Carlo program to simulate the propagation of optical photons • ROOT library (Version: 3.3, with ROOT 4.04/02; Windows, Linux with gcc 3.2) • Developped at CEA, Saclay, France for GLAST and the CMS calorimeter (http://gentit.home.cern.ch/gentit/litrani) • Classes and data library from measured materials : • Scintillators: PbWO4, CsI(Tl) • Revetments: Tyvek, VM2000 • Detectors: PMT (XP2020), APD • Surface state: depolished, thin slice of air • Easy to extend the library
Material definition (1) • All properties parametrized as a function of the wavelength • Crystal geometry and parameters: • Light emission • Absorption length • Index of refraction • Revetment: • Diffusion and reflection • absorption • Glue • absorption length • reflectivity • PMT definition • Glass window refraction, absorption length and reflectivity • Photocathode surface and reflectivity • Quantum efficiency
Material definition (2) • Time profile • Wavelength profile
Crystal: CsI(Tl) (Saint Gobain), wrapped with reflector (VM2000, Tyveck?) Geometry: [A]: 22 (h) × 22(w) × 200(l) mm [B]: 22 (h) × 44(w) × 200(l) mm [C]: 22 (h) × 66(w) × 200(l) mm Particles: g (500 keV – 30 MeV) Tests: with (511 and) 662 keV Readout (on face w × h): PMT (Photonis 19 mm Ø, 17 mm PK Ø) APD (square, 10 mm) Goals: Optimize the readout Particle localization Questions Energy resolution Homogeneity Time response Requirements for the simulation Readout (PMT, APD) y g x z w CsI(Tl) h l
PIN – CsI(Tl)#2 y x z Simulation results: yield vs position • Yield over a quarter of the volume (for 50 000 photons emitted), sum over 5 µs • Relative RMS of the yield distribution = contribution of the collection to the resolution / dispersion dominated by the statistics • Optimistic hypotheses on the PIN, dependence on the crystal doping
PMT PIN Simulation analysis with CsI(Tl) #1 • Wavelength: statistics over the whole simulated volume • Result dependent on the wavelength distribution width chosen for the simulation • Histograms can also be available for a voxel
Simulated tracks in a single crystal • Input = ROOT file from GEANT4 simulations by T. Zerguerras • Current algorithm: • Generate a random yield values from the distribution calculated on the volume • Calculate the number of photons received from those yields and the deposited energy • Simulation with the PMT and PIN diode (with CsI(Tl) #1)
Conclusion • The RDD group can carry out a full simulation of the crystal response: resolution and time response • Next steps • Comparison of simulations with measurements (source + different crystals: 22, 44, 66mm) • Refine the models: • APD response • Scintillator response • Consequences of ageing • Detector noise