SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

Outcomes of Continuous Venovenous Hemodialysis in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients

shira avatar
shira
15 diapositives · 312 Views · Aug 25, 2014

This retrospective study reviews the outcomes of pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital between 2003 and 2007. The analysis involved 41 patients, primarily HSCT recipients, focusing on survival rates, treatment effectiveness, and predictive factors for ICU mortality. Findings suggest that while non-HSCT patients have comparable ICU survival rates to the general ICU population, HSCT patients demonstrate poor 6-month survival. This study highlights the need for selective therapy and further research into enhancing long-term survival.

Outcomes of Continuous Venovenous Hemodialysis in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients - slide 1
01 / 15Outcomes of Continuous Venovenous Hemodialysis in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Outcomes of Continuous Venovenous Hemodialysis in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. A Retrospective Study of Outcomes in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients Receiving Continuous Venovenous Hemodialysis Y Avent1, N Henderson1, T Collie1, RF Tamburro2, L Elbahlawan1, RR Morrison1, S Rajasekaran1 1 St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 2 Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania

  2. Study Design • Single Center Retrospective Review from January 2003-December 2007 • 8 bed ICU • Total CRRT days 689 averaging 172 treatment days/year • 41 patients received a total of 48 treatments • Median age of this cohort was 12 years. Range (7.8 months -24 years) • 23 males and 18 females • 30 Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) patients (73%) • Allogenic n=29 • Autologous n=1 • 11 non-HSCT patients (26%) • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia n=5 • Acute Myeloid Leukemia n=4 • Ewing’s Sarcoma n=1 • Glioblastoma Multiforme n=1

  3. CRRT Modality • Modality • CVVHD • Anti-coagulant • Citrate • Dialysate • Normocarb HFTM • Dialysate rates • (2000ml/hr x BSA)/1.73m2=ml/hr • Blood Flow Rates • Average 2-4 ml/kg/min. • Filters • Renaflo II – polysulfone membrane • PAN – polyacrylonitrile membrane • Circuit Change • Every 3 days if patient’s clinical condition permits • Machine • B Braun Diapact

  4. Indications for CRRT 41 patients with 48 episodes of CRRT • Fluid overload • n=12 • Renal Failure • acute: n=29 • transition from Intermittent Hemodialysis (IHD) to CRRT n=5 • Improving Fluid homeostasis in Congestive Heart Failure • n=1 • Tumor Cell Lysis • n=1

  5. CRRT Variables • HSCT patients 15.9±2.02 days therapy • Non HSCT 9.6±2.9 days therapy • 2 different filters used ( PAN and Renaflo) • Of all variables statistically compared BUN > 75 at CVVHD initiation and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at end of therapy were predictive of ICU death (p-value < 0.05). • Hyperglycemia, high creatinine, oliguria and fluid balance not predictive of ICU mortality. • A BUN > 29 mg/dL at day +7 was said to be predictive of mortality in HSCT patients in previous study. (Bacigalupo et al 1999)

  6. CRRT Survivors • HSCT patients (n=30) • ICU survival – HSCT pts 36% • Reasons for CVVHD D/C • IHD Transition n=7 • Improved renal function n=4 • Support withdrawn n=2 • Non-HSCT patients (n=11) • ICU survival – non-HSCT pts 42% • Reasons for CVVHD D/C • IHD Transition n=2 • Improved Renal Function n=3

  7. ICU Non-Survivors • HSCT ICU patients - 70% (21 of 30) • MSOD n=7 • Veno-occlusive disease of liver n=3 • Pulmonary failure n=3 • Sepsis n=2 • Cardiopulmonary failure n=2 • Relapse n=1 • Other n=3 • Median PRISM score at CRRT initiation n=17 • Non-HSCT patients – 55% (6 of 11) • MSOD n=3 • Primary malignancy n=2 • Secondary malignancy n=1 • Median PRISM score at CRRT initiation n=21.5

  8. Survivors Vs Non Survivors * Non survivors had higher BUN at -24 * than survivors P<0.05.

  9. HSCT patients * Difference in CRP value reaches statistical significance* only at CVVHD end

  10. ICU Issues • HSCT patients - BUN > 75mg/dL and CRP are predictive of ICU mortality. • Mechanical ventilation, use of pressors, hyperglycemia at CVVHD onset not predictive of ICU mortality. • Oxygenation index and PF ratio in allogenic HSCT patients improved after 24 hours of CVVHD. • 13.2±1.5 Vs 9.2±1.5 and 176.7±17.2 Vs 236±20.3 (Both indices P<0.05) • Mean PRISM scores for CVVHD episodes among HSCT patients were 16.4±0.7 compared to non-HSCT 19.9±1.1 (not statistically significant)

  11. 6 month Survival • HSCT patients - 3% (1of 30 patients) • Only 3/30 HSCTs had recurrence of primary oncologic disease. • Non HSCT patients – 36% (4 of 11 patients) survived to 6 months • Overall 6 mo. Survival – 12% (5 of 41) • Benoit et al reported 6 month survival in adult patients with hematologic malignancies at 14%.

  12. Limitations of Study • Small sample size makes it difficult to draw conclusions • Findings may not be relevant to other centers • Retrospective analysis • No data regarding patients not referred to the ICU for CRRT • Heterogeneity in primary oncologic disease and variation in oncologic therapy makes analysis difficult.

  13. Conclusion • Effective, safe renal replacement modality • Resource intensive • Non-HSCT patient ICU survival compares favorably with general ICU populations (Goldstein et al Pediatrics 107(6); June 2001) • 6 month survival rates for HSCT patients is not encouraging

  14. Ethical Considerations • Poor 6 month survival outcomes for HSCT patients • More selective in offering therapy if we can identify patients who are likely to survive to ICU discharge • Managing expectations of families

  15. Future Research • Attempt to delineate factors which can translate short term success into 6 month survival for HSCT patients • Parent/patient perceptions • CVVHD vs. other modalities in HSCT patients • Immune modulation with CVVHD • PRISM scores for HSCT vs. Non HSCT patients