1 / 20

The Lower Athabasca Regional Plan: A Case Study

The Lower Athabasca Regional Plan: A Case Study. Biol. 595 Sept. 16, 2009. Lower Athabasca Planning Region. 93,000 km 2 Boreal Forest Green Zone. Fires since 1950. Major Land Uses. Net Present Value: Petroleum and Forestry. Crown Revenues in the Athabasca Region (2007).

sybil
Télécharger la présentation

The Lower Athabasca Regional Plan: A Case Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Lower Athabasca Regional Plan: A Case Study Biol. 595 Sept. 16, 2009

  2. Lower Athabasca Planning Region • 93,000 km2 • Boreal Forest • Green Zone

  3. Fires since 1950

  4. Major Land Uses

  5. Net Present Value: Petroleum and Forestry

  6. Crown Revenues in the Athabasca Region (2007)

  7. Management Approach • Environmental impact assessments and review (large projects) • Mineral surface leases (oil and gas) • Forest Management Agreements and Detailed Forest Management Plans • Operating plans, permits, regulations: • Mitigation of environment damage • Many land managers: SRD, Env, Energy, ERCB

  8. A Framework for: • support for continued economic development that addresses environ- mental needs • creating an enhanced management framework • foundation of environ- mental information • identifying priority issues 1999

  9. Cumulative Env. Mgmt. Assoc. (CEMA) • Multi-Stakeholder Association with over 40 member organizations: • Industry (forest sector, energy sector) • Environmental NGOs • Municipal, Provincial and Federal governments (multiple depts) • Aboriginal • provides recommendations to government on how to manage cumulative environmental effects • Working Groups for Air, Land and Water: • NOxSOx • Surface Water • Reclamation • Trace Metal Air Contaminants • Traditional Ecological Knowledge • Sustainable Ecosystems

  10. Conflicts • Oilsands vs. gas producers • Oilsands vs. forestry companies • Resource industry vs. Native People • Social issues in Fort McMurray • Ecological issues: • Rapid decline in caribou populations • Loss of old growth along river valleys • Reduced quantity and quality of water in the Athabasca River • Reclamation of tailings ponds (lakes) • Release of CO2,

  11. Priorities of Albertans (2006) • 62% of respondents agree with the statement, “I feel that no industrial activity should occur in areas which are habitat for endangered species, no matter how careful companies try to be.” • 84% of respondents agree with the statement, “Access and use of forests should be based firstly on preserving and protecting the environment and sustaining wildlife habitat at the expense of sustained economic benefits and jobs” • 76% of respondents agree with the statement, “I feel that the government needs to put limits and set priorities on who is able to use the forest, how, when and where.” Alberta Forest Products Association

  12. Key Points: • supported by extensive stakeholder-driven scenario analyses • acknowledges energy as the key driver; trade- offs will be necessary • triad proposed as central management approach with 20-40% protection • range of natural variation concept

  13. Management Goals: Environmental • Preserve the diversity of species, ecosystems and landscapes • Sustain viable and healthy populations of wildlife and fish • Sustain the natural range of vegetation communities, successional patterns, and ecological processes • Sustain natural watersheds and their elements

  14. Management Goals: Economic • Sustain a land base for timber harvest • Maintain opportunities for oilsands and hydrocarbon reserves development • Maintain opportunities for mineral resource development • Maintain opportunities for tourism development • Maintain opportunities for consumptive use of fish and wildlife and for traditional Aboriginal use

  15. Key Learnings • Most environmental indicators will decline outside their natural range of variation (NRV) with continued development in the absence of management intervention.

  16. 0 50 km 100 km Intensive Extensive Protected Base Case 4MM b/d peak Key Learning: An 20% network of protected areas could be designed without limiting the ability to deliver a 4 million bbl/d peak bitumen production scenario. 2100-2105 Period 20

  17. Key Points: • completion within 1 year • led by government planning team • supported by modeling team and a public advisory committee • time horizon = 50 years • plan will articulate desired outcomes • plan will integrate provincial policies • plan will set thresholds to manage cumulative impacts • 20% protection target 2009

  18. Reasons for Concern • A regional plan is not the only source of objectives for decision makers: • Existing sectoral policies and mandates • Municipal officials answerable to local voters • Resource companies answerable to shareholders • Momentum of existing land-use trajectory • Lessons from past planning initiatives

  19. Who is the Land Manager? • Who is accountable for ensuring that management thresholds or limits are respected within a system characterized by considerable decentralization in decision making? • Who is responsible for monitoring progress and taking action to keep the regional plan on track if and when problems are encountered?

More Related