1 / 13

Going underground

Going underground . Debunking Secrecy and Hazing in NPHC Fraternity Recruitment Presented by Courtney Brewer, Reiner Gall, A’dja Jones, and Sarah Nyquist. Overview. Introduction and overview of the issue – Reiner Analysis of the issue – A’dja The intervention – Courtney

tamma
Télécharger la présentation

Going underground

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Going underground Debunking Secrecy and Hazing in NPHC Fraternity Recruitment Presented by Courtney Brewer, Reiner Gall, A’dja Jones, and Sarah Nyquist

  2. Overview • Introduction and overview of the issue – Reiner • Analysis of the issue – A’dja • The intervention – Courtney • Assessment of the intervention – Sarah

  3. The issue • The National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC) • Pledge Process • Issues with hazing • Intake process

  4. The issue • Hazing/pledging went underground • Problem was still there • Deaths of students • Physical abuse • Often unreported • Multiple cases of “underground” hazing around the country

  5. The issue • Questions to consider • Why do students haze? • What is the emotional/psychological impact of hazing, both on the victim and the attacker? • How did chapter members get away with hazing? • How can we prevent the problem in the future without tarnishing the proud tradition of NPHC?

  6. Targeted audience • BGL (Black Greek Letter) Organizations, specifically fraternities • Members often include: • African American males • Ages from 18-24 • Various backgrounds • Fraternity and sorority life community • Any student organization with potential or past hazing issues • Administration and Fraternity/Sorority Life advisors • BGL Alumni and National Organization

  7. Theoretical Analysis • Why do student organizations haze? • Numerous organizations • Why do Black Greek Letter (BGL) Fraternities haze? • Strong tradition of ritual • Physical vs Intellectual • Rite of Passage • Pride

  8. Theoretical Analysis (continueD) • What are the emotional and psychological impacts of hazing for both the attacker and victim? • Rebirth • Earn a spot amongst fraternal elites • Physical and mental distress • Death • Tradition of violence • Guilt • Why does hazing occur? • Not a wrong-doing • Lack of reporting • Lack of supervision • Advisors and staff afraid of being seen as intolerant/racist • “Mind you own business”

  9. Hazing prevention • What can be done to eliminate and demote hazing? • Research • University wide approach • Keep records and maintain infraction list • Zero tolerance policy • Commissions for student organizations • Prevention vs Punishment • Establish rules • Accountability • Punishment • Correlating departments • Creating programs • Partnerships • Open and honest communication with National Pan Hellenic Council

  10. Hazing prevention (continued) • Punishment for faculty, staff, and advisors • Establish “safe” zones • Hear hazing issues or complaints • Offer resources • Eliminate chapters with history of behavior

  11. Developmental Assessment • Schlossberg’s Transition Theory • Baggage • Predominantly White Campus • Cross & Fhagen-Smith’s Model of Black Identity Development

  12. References (Literature review) • Allan, Elizabeth J., Madden, Mary. (2011)Hazing in View: College Students at Risk http://www.hazingstudy.org/publications/hazing_in_view_web.pdf. • Brewer, B. W.,Cornelius, A. E., Linder, D. E., & Van Raalte, J. L. (2007). The relationship between hazing and team cohesion. Journal of Sport Behavior, 30:4, 491-507. • Campo, S., Poulos, G., & Sipple, J. W. (2005). Prevalence and profiling: Hazing among college students and points of intervention. American Journal of Health and Behavior, 29:2, 137-149.

  13. References (continued) • Hall, C. A., Richardson, B. K., & Wang, Z. (2012). Blowing the whistle against greekhazing: The theory of reasoned action as a framework for reporting intentions. Communication Studies, 63:2, 172-193. • Jones, R. L., (2000). The historical significance of sacrificial ritual: Understanding violence in the modern black fraternity pledge process. The Western Journal of Black Studies, 24, 112-124. • Langford, L. (2008). A comprehensive approach to hazing prevention in higher education settings. Retrieved from Higher Education Center website: http://www.edc.org/hec/pubs/violence.pdf • Nuwar, H. (1999). Wrongs of passage: Fraternities, sororities, hazing and binge drinking. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

More Related