Download Presentation
## Chapter 29

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

**Chapter 29**Particles and Waves**There is nothing new to be discovered in physics now. All**that remains is more and more precise measurement. -- William Thomson, Lord Kelvin(Address at the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 1900).**Quantum Physics**• 2nd revolution in physics: • Starts with Planck ~1900 • Contributions from Einstein, Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, Born, Dirac, de Broglie …. over 25 years • Cornerstones: • Wave-particle duality • Uncertainty principle • Correspondence • Applies for small dimensions • Planck’s constant: h = 6.6 x 10-34Js • As h -> 0, quantum physics -> classical**Solvay conference, 1927**Front row: I. Langmuir, M. Planck, M. Curie, H. A. Lorentz, A. Einstein, P. Langevin, C. E. Guye, C. T. R. Wilson, O. W. Richardson. Second row: P. Debye, M. Knudsen, W. L. Bragg, H. A. Kramers, P. A. M. Dirac, A. H. Compton, L. V. de Broglie, M. Born, N. Bohr. Standing: A. Piccard, E. Henriot, P. Ehrenfest, E. Herzen, T. De Donder, E. Schroedinger, E. Verschaffelt, W. Pauli, W. Heisenberg, R. H. Fowler, L. Brillouin.**Solvay conference, 1927**Heisenberg Schrödinger deBroglie Compton Pauli Born Bohr Dirac Bragg Lorentz Planck Curie Einstein Front row: I. Langmuir, M. Planck, M. Curie, H. A. Lorentz, A. Einstein, P. Langevin, C. E. Guye, C. T. R. Wilson, O. W. Richardson. Second row: P. Debye, M. Knudsen, W. L. Bragg, H. A. Kramers, P. A. M. Dirac, A. H. Compton, L. V. de Broglie, M. Born, N. Bohr. Standing: A. Piccard, E. Henriot, P. Ehrenfest, E. Herzen, T. De Donder, E. Schroedinger, E. Verschaffelt, W. Pauli, W. Heisenberg, R. H. Fowler, L. Brillouin.**Cavity is model of a perfect blackbody**1. Blackbody radiation a) Blackbody • All objects radiate and absorb electromagnetic radiation • At equilibrium, rate of absorption = rate of emission • Best absorber is best emitter • Perfect absorber is perfect emitter**b) Emmitance spectrum: the problem**Plot of intensity vs wavelength • Depends only on temperature Experimental spectrum:**Theory**Classical prediction: The UV catastrophe • Based on idea that all oscillations equally probable, more oscillations at lower wavelength • Violates common sense and experiment**c) Energy quantization: the solution**Absorption and emission occur in discrete quanta only Energy of quanta proportional to frequency • For small wavelength (high freq), quanta are large. If kT < quantum, radiation not possible.**d) Planck’s constant, h**• Planck found a “fudge factor” by “happy guesswork” to make the experiment fit. He developed a quantization theory to predict the value h. • “lucky artifact of more fundamental reality yet to be discovered” • Nobel prize, 1918**2. Photoelectric effect**a) The effect**Work required to**remove electron Energy of photon (from Planck) c) Einstein theory KEmax = hf - W0**• Found same value for h as Planck had**• Nobel prize in 1921 • In 1913, Planck recommended Einstein for membership in the Prussian Academy. “Notwithstanding his genius, he may sometimes have missed the target in his speculations, as, for example, in his hypothesis of light quanta.”**3. The Compton Effect, 1923**The effect: Scattering of x-ray by electron changes the wavelength**X-ray source (l)**Crystal q graphite Detector Bragg reflection gives l’ b) The experiment**c) Classical prediction**- incident wave excites electron at frequency f - electron radiates at frequency f**l**l’ d) Compton’s explanation - Conservation of energy: - Conservation of Momentum: - Energy-momentum relation for light: Combining these equations gives: Nobel prize, 1928 Definitive evidence for photons**4. The de Broglie wavelength, 1924**The hypothesis The dual nature observed in light is present in matter: } A photon has energy From electromagnetism, By analogy, de Broglie proposed that a particle with momentum p is associated with a wave with wavelength:**b) Interpretation of the particle wave**Waves and particles propogate and interfere like waves, but interact like particles. The intensity of the wave (represented by a wave function at a point in space represents the probability of observing a particle at that location.**5. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle**The wave nature of particles means that position and momentum (wavelength) cannot simultaneously be determined to arbitrary accuracy. The smaller the slit above, the better the y-position is known, but the greater the spread in y-momentum.**The principle applies separately to any component of**momentum and position: and to energy and time: