1 / 26

Self-Service Business Intelligence for the Product Management Department

Self-Service Business Intelligence for the Product Management Department. (Contoso Corporation) (November 2009). Contents. Executive Summary Current State Analysis Future State Analysis Business Case Adoption & Implementation Planning Next Steps. 4. Background.

tarika
Télécharger la présentation

Self-Service Business Intelligence for the Product Management Department

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Self-Service Business Intelligence for the Product Management Department (Contoso Corporation) (November 2009)

  2. Contents • Executive Summary • Current State Analysis • Future State Analysis • Business Case • Adoption & Implementation Planning • Next Steps 4

  3. Background • (Contoso) currently faces a number of challenges related to its departmental performance reporting processes, including: • Departmental analysts must work through IT department to collect performance data from LOB systems • Access to info is available to the few, not the many • Professional staff time is spent collecting and validating data, leaving little time for analysis and taking time from their regular jobs • IT perceived as a bottleneck for the few execs who do see LOB data • Long reporting process taking 10 days cycle time per month, leading to out-of-date reports when finalized • Limited integration between financial, operational, and unstructured information sources creates integration problems for users to coordinate reports 5

  4. Engagement Participants 6

  5. Executive Summary • (Partner Name) proposes expanding upon (Contoso’s) current Office System deployment to incorporate self-service analysis and reporting capabilities in Office 2010 to improve information access and streamline departmental reporting processes. • Implementing the proposed Self-Service BI Solution will provide (Contoso) with: • Self-service access to critical performance information • More accurate and timely performance reports resulting in better management business decisions • Ability to link operational data to KPI reports • 55% decrease in labor required to develop performance report • Reduce overall reporting cycle time by 80% • Anticipated annual benefit to (Contoso) of $260,000 7

  6. Executive Summary 8

  7. Contents • Executive Summary • Current State Analysis • Future State Analysis • Business Case • Adoption & Implementation Planning • Next Steps 9

  8. Current State Process Analysis Performance Reporting Process Analysis Summary 10

  9. Current State Process Diagram Total Labor: 3.5 Total Labor: 1.0 Total Labor: 11.25 Total Elapsed Time: 7 Days 11

  10. Current State Process Diagram Total Labor: 0.75 Total Labor: 1.25 Total Labor: 2.0 Total Labor: 8.5 Total Elapsed Time: 3 Days 12

  11. Contents • Executive Summary • Current State Analysis • Future State Analysis • Business Case • Adoption & Implementation Planning • Next Steps 13

  12. Future State Process Analysis Performance Reporting Process Phases – Analysis Summary 14

  13. Prioritized Process Solutions High 5 Integrate performance data with planning data, operational systems, and unstructured sources (SharePoint Server 2010 with PerformancePoint Services and Excel Services) Level Of Complexity 3 • Develop Executive Performance Dashboard • (SharePoint Server 2010 with PerformancePoint Services and Excel Services) • Open Access to Performance Report Editing by LOB Managers • (SharePoint Server 2010 ) Automated report distribution, publishing, and sharing (SharePoint Server 2010) Low 1 5 1 3 High Low Value to Business 15

  14. Future State Process Diagram Total Labor: 4.25 Total Elapsed Time: 1 Day

  15. Future State Process Diagram Total Labor: 1.0 Total Labor: 2.75 Total Labor: 2.0 Total Labor: 3.5 Total Elapsed Time: 1 Day

  16. Contents • Executive Summary • Current State Analysis • Future State Analysis • Business Case • Adoption & Implementation Planning • Next Steps 18

  17. Anticipated Benefits - Process 19

  18. Anticipated Benefits - Financial 20

  19. Anticipated Costs 21

  20. Contents • Executive Summary • Current State Analysis • Future State Analysis • Business Case • Adoption & Implementation Planning • Next Steps 22

  21. Adoption & Implementation Planning Summary 23

  22. Project Plan 24

  23. Potential Adoption Roadblocks 25

  24. Adoption Roadblock Mitigation Actions by Stakeholder 26

  25. Contents • Executive Summary • Current State Analysis • Future State Analysis • Business Case • Adoption & Implementation Planning • Next Steps 27

  26. Next Steps • Review presentation and proposal with (Customer Name) decision maker and stakeholders for approval • Consider a SharePoint Deployment Planning Services (SDPS) follow-up engagement • Execute work order for project • Schedule kick off meeting for week of _____ and weekly status meetings • Propose schedule: • A) Deadlines for initial milestones, or • B) Date to finalize initial milestones 28

More Related