1 / 14

Chapter 2: Power and Education Policy

Chapter 2: Power and Education Policy. Dr. Dan Bertrand LEEA 554. DEFINING POWER. The play of power shapes the outcome of the policy process. Power is an essentially contested concept. One’s understanding of it is shaped by one’s theory of human nature and society.

tausiq
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 2: Power and Education Policy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chapter 2: Power and Education Policy Dr. Dan Bertrand LEEA 554

  2. DEFINING POWER • The play of power shapes the outcome of the policy process. • Power is an essentially contested concept. • One’s understanding of it is shaped by one’s theory of human nature and society. • “A” has power over “B” to the extent that “A” cqn get “B” to do something that otherwise “B” would not do.

  3. Questions • Does A have to be consciously aware of excercising power over B ?Does B have to be consciously aware of A’s power? • Can A’s exercise of power cause B not to act? • Has A exercised power if B believes that what A wants is good and eagerly agrees to do it? • Is it ethical to exercise power over another?

  4. A DEFINITION OF POWER • The ability of an actor to affect the behavior of another actor. • Actor could be a superintendent, principal, governor, union president, school board, state legislature. • The willingness to exercise power include the willingness to deploy resources.

  5. Type of Power Relationships • Symmetrical • Actors who have a similar degree of power • Shared power • Assymetrical • Actors with significantly different amouts of resources. • May use persuasion or bargaining • More powerful may use force, appeals to authority or reward/punishment.

  6. DISCOURSE and POWER • Discourse – has three aspects • Text- written, spoken or combination • Discourse practice that governs the production of the text. • Rules and traditions of meetings • Chairman usually runs the meeting • Social Practice • Embeds both test and discourse practice

  7. 3 Dimensions of Power

  8. 2nd Dimension- Mobilization of Bias • Implicit power. • Few or none of the actors may realize the power is being exercised. • Bias limits the participation of certain groups or restricts issues that can be raised for debate. • Types- parental involvement, minority children, women

  9. ACTIVITY • News Story for Analysis- Union takes up tenure fight. • P. 49-50

  10. 3rd Dimension Shaping of Consciousness • Social institutions shape consciousness • Family • Mass media • Unusual disempowerment • Apathy leads to laying blame with the victims.

  11. Analyzing Power Relationships • PRINCE analysis • Issue statement examples • Appropriate- Pass a bond issue to build a middle school next year. • Inappropriate- More funding for schools. • Appropriate-Defeat HB128 to limit choice of textbooks. • Inappropriate- Keep legislators out of textbook selection. • See page- 40-44

  12. Activity • Read Case Study- page 48-49 • Do PRINCE ANALYSIS for this case.

  13. Ethical IssuesPower as a Means and End • Individual Means- to achieve a personal goal. • Individual End- to achieve a sense of importance. • Means for a Group- to advance the goals of a group. • End for a Group- to enhance power because the group likes being influential.

  14. Activity • Do a PRINCE Analysis of an issue in your district.

More Related