1 / 27

The European Network for Traumatic Stress Training & Practice

The European Network for Traumatic Stress Training & Practice. www.tentsproject.eu. The diagnosis of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Ask Elklit, Denmark. Glimpses of the history of trauma.

tudor
Télécharger la présentation

The European Network for Traumatic Stress Training & Practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The European Network for Traumatic StressTraining & Practice www.tentsproject.eu

  2. The diagnosis of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Ask Elklit, Denmark

  3. Glimpses of the history of trauma • ‘Railway spine’ (1866) was a diagnosis given after railway accidents to describe emotional and personality impact • Pierre Janet (1889) developed a dynamic understanding of trauma that is still valid • Various wars gave name to ‘soldiers’ heart’, ‘shell shock’, ‘combat neurosis’, ‘KZ-syndrom’, ‘Vietnam syndrom’ etc. • This knowledge disappeared in the years following the wars and was ‘reinvented’

  4. Horowitz (1976) • In the book, ”Stress Response Syndrom”, Mardi Horowitz described what he saw as the core dynamics after a traumatic experience: • A long-lasting oscilliation between intrusive reexperiences and denial/avoidance • As Horowitz mainly worked with bereaved people, he paid little attention to arousal symptoms

  5. Split Perceptions Cognitions Actions Emotions Paralysed Hyperstate Model of the consciousness in shock

  6. Scenes in a fixed order Amnesia for Intervening details Model of the perceptual condensation (”etching”) after trauma

  7. Demografis Personality Body state Social group Life events Traumatic event (situational factors) Original shock / defence reflexes (dissociation) *PLEASE ADD AN EXPLANANTION FOR TEACHERS: Defence Attribu- tions Coping (action possibilities) Social support (secondary victimization) Primary appraisal (cognitive-emotional) Hypervigiilance Intrusive recollections Avoidance Psychiatric syndromes (ASD, PTSD etc.) Personality disorders / dysfunctional traits Social changes Psycho-physiological disorders

  8. The DSM-III (a) • Before DSM-III, clinicians and scientists met and tried to find common ground in the symptoms of veterans, rape victims, and battered women. • In 1980, the APA published the first version of PTSD with the three core symptom clusters • Re-experiencing (”intrusive”) • Avoidance • Hypervigiliance (”arousal”)

  9. DSM-III (b) • The clusters consist of items that are descriptive; so are the clusters and there are no expectations about the inherent dynamics as suggested by Horowitz • The Hypervigiliance cluster is a substantial development and addition to the work of Horowitz acknowledging the psychosomatic aspects of experiencing an extreme and threatening situation • Confer the Kardiner (1941) concept of trauma as a ”psychoneurosis”

  10. PTSD today (DSM-IV) • The stressor criteria (both A1 and A2): • A1 ”a life threatening situation, injury or threat to physical integrity” • This can be direct exposure or indirect – witnessing events • The subjective experience is what counts • A2 The person reacts with fear or help-lessness

  11. Re-experiencing (1 symptom) • 1) Recurrent thoughts or perceptions of the event • 2) Recurrent dreams of the event • 3) Acting or feeling as if the event were recurring (flashbacks) • 4) Intense psychological distress and • (5) physiological reactivity when exposed to cues resembling the event

  12. Avoidance 1 (3/7 symptoms) • 1) Avoiding trauma thoughts and feelings • 2) Avoiding activities, places, and people that remind of the trauma • 3) Inability to recall important parts of trauma • 4) Lack of interest in significant activities

  13. Avoidance 2 • 5) Feeling of detachment from others • 6) Restricted affect (no loving feelings) • 7) Sense of a foreshortened future • Note: The two first symptoms are conscious efforts; 4-6 are called ’numbness’ (inability to express feelings and plan for a future). Symptoms not present before the trauma

  14. Hypervigiliance (2/5 symptoms) • Difficulties falling or staying asleep • Irritability or outburst of anger • Difficulty concentrating • Hypervigiliance* • Exaggerated startle response* Note: Symptoms not present before the trauma. The three first may be considered less specific than the two last symptoms*

  15. Duration • Duration of symptoms more than one month • Acute PTSD (less than 3 months) • Chronic (3 months or more) • Delayed (if onset is at least 6 months after the trauma)

  16. Functional impairment • The disturbance causes clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning

  17. PTSD according to WHO • In the ICD-10 diagnostic system, F 43.1 describes PTSD quite differently • The stressor criterion is normative • ”exposed to an unusual threatening or catastrophe stressor that in almost everyone would result in extensive and very distressing reactions” • This downplays the traumas in everyday life

  18. ICD-10 (cont.) • The re-experiencing symptoms corresponds to DSM-IV 2,3, and 4 • Avoidance demands one symptom • Hypervigiliance is like DSM-IV (2/5 symptoms • Amnesia can substitute the hypervigiliance symptoms

  19. ICD-10 (cont.) • Duration: symptoms must be present before 6 months • No functional impairment demands. • The diagnosis can be given after a few days

  20. ICD-10 and DSM-IV compared • Very little research has used the ICD-10 • It is easier to get a PTSD diagnosis from ICD-10 than from DSM-IV • There is little (35%) concordance between diagnoses given by the two systems due to fewer demands in the ICD-10 avoidance clusters and lack of impairment criterion • Epidemiological studies using ICD-10 reveal very few cases of PTSD

  21. Empirical analyses of PTSD • No study has replicated the PTSD structure with the three symptom clusters • Many have suggested that the avoidance group should be divided in conscious avoidance and numbing. • Numbing seems to be closely associated with hypervigiliance where conscious avoidance is associated with re-experiencing

  22. Empirical analyses of PTSD - 2 • Recently, several have suggested that numbing symptoms together the non-specific hypervigiliance symptoms constitute a dysphoria factor not specific to PTSD

  23. Subclinical PTSD • A large number of clients miss one symptom to get the full diagnosis • They typically miss one avoidance symptom • They are often described as having ’sub-syndromal’, ’partial’, or ’subclinical’ PTSD

  24. Subclinical PTSD - 2 • This group often requires clinical attention • It is important to distinguish between those who once had PTSD and are now in partial remission and those never exceeded the full PTSD threshold • For this group is important to consider the functional impairment criterion

  25. PTSD remission • PTSD symptoms often decrease in the weeks and months following a trauma • After three to six months a stabilisation (= little or no change) often comes about • One third will recover fully • One third will have a number of symptoms • One third will become chronic cases

  26. PTSD and other disorders • Having PTSD means that 4 out of 5 will have comorbid (= at the same time) disorders; the most common being: • Anxiety (and phobias) • Depression • Somatoform disorders • Alcohol and drug abuse • Some also develop a personality disorder

More Related