1 / 28

Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement

Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement. PRESENTATION CONTENTS. OVERVIEW OF THE EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY EXAMPLE OF MASS EQUIVALENCE EXAMPLE OF GAS CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENCE RESULTS TO DATE, TABULAR RESULTS TO DATE, PARTIAL GRAPHICAL CONCLUSORY STATEMENTS. EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY - OVERVIEW.

urian
Télécharger la présentation

Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement

  2. PRESENTATION CONTENTS • OVERVIEW OF THE EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY • EXAMPLE OF MASS EQUIVALENCE • EXAMPLE OF GAS CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENCE • RESULTS TO DATE, TABULAR • RESULTS TO DATE, PARTIAL GRAPHICAL • CONCLUSORY STATEMENTS

  3. EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY - OVERVIEW EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY ~ OVERVIEW ~

  4. EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY - OVERVIEW • TESTING OCCURS IN A FIXTURE CONTAINING SALIENT FEATURES OF THE ENGINE NACELLE ENVIRONMENT • THE EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY IS TWO-PART • ESTABLISH A MASS EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN AGENTS BASED ON FIRE EXTINCTION PERFORMANCE • A H1301 BENCHMARK IS ESTABLISHED • THE REPLACEMENT CANDIDATE QUANTITY IS CHANGED UNTIL THE H1301 BENCHMARK IS MET OR EXCEEDED • ESTABLISH A CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENCE BASED ON AGENT DISTRIBUTION BEHAVIOR OF THE MASS EQUIVALENT • GAS ANALYSIS IS USED TO CAPTURE PERFORMANCE • TIES BACK TO FIRE EXTINCTION PERFORMANCE • PROCESS IS REPEATED IN 4 EQUIVALENCE ITERATIONS TO FIND THE LARGEST EQUIVALENT CONCENTRATION (2 ventilation conditions x 2 fire threats)

  5. TEST SECTION DIMENSIONS 48 INCH OD SHELL 24 INCH OD CORE ~ 10.3 FEET LONG UP AIRFLOW FWD STA 502 IMAGERY - TEST FIXTURE

  6. EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY – Pt I, MASS EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY, PART I ~ MASS EQUIVALENCE ~

  7. EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY – Pt I, MASS • TEST FIXTURE VENTILATION IS SET TO 1 OF 2 POINTS • THE OBJECT IS TO BRACKET SYSTEM BEHAVIOR • HIGH VENTILATION (HiVent) ~ 2.2 LBM/S @ 100°F • LOW VENTILATION (LoVent) ~ 1.0 LBM/S @ 260°F • H1301 CERTIFICATION IS KNOWN FOR BOTH CASES • AGENT IS STORED AT 100°F • AGENT DISCHARGE IS ~ 1 SECOND • H1301 BENCHMARK (FIRE TESTING) IS ACCOMPLISHED WITH THE APPLICABLE CERTIFICATION PROFILE • H1301 DISTRIBUTION IS REASONABLY SYMMETRIC • DISCHARGE IS NOT DIRECTED AT THE FIRE THREAT • MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 5 FT SEPARATES AGENT INJECTION AND THE FLAME FRONTS

  8. REGION OF FLAME DURING FIRE TEST UP STA 502 STA 527 FWD 11 10 1 2 4 12 9 3 UP 12:00 7 5 LOOKING FWD DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE RIGHT 3:00 8 6 IMAGERY – SAMPLING PROBE LOCATIONS, SPRAY

  9. IMAGERY – TYPICAL H1301 CERTIFICATION GRAPH, HiVent

  10. IMAGERY – TYPICAL H1301 CERTIFICATION GRAPH, LoVent

  11. REGION OF FLAME DURING FIRE TEST UP STA 502 STA 527 FWD 11 10 12 4 2 1 9 3 UP 12:00 LOOKING FWD 5 DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 7 RIGHT 3:00 8 6 IMAGERY – SAMPLING PROBE LOCATIONS, POOL

  12. EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY – Pt I, MASS • DEFINING THE H1301 BENCHMARK • DETERMINED FOR EACH EQUIVALENCE ITERATION • EQUIVALENCE ITERATION = “VENTILATION + FIRE THREAT” • POOL FIRE THREAT – JP8 •  150°F @ 220 IN^2 x 0.5IN DEEP • ELECTRICAL ARC REMAINS ON DURING AGENT INJECTION • SPRAY FIRE THREAT – JP8, LUBRICANT OR HYDRAULIC FLUID •  150°F @ 0.25 GPM • FUEL SPRAY & ELECTRICAL ARC REMAIN ON DURING AGENT INJECTION • FUEL SPRAY STRIKES HOT SURFACE DURING AGENT INJECTION • RESULT FROM 1 FIRE TEST = REIGNITION TIME DELAY (RTD) • RTD = time (FIRE EXTINCTION) – time (FIRE REIGNITION) • RTD IS ASSESSED FROM VIDEO RECORD OF EACH FIRE TEST • H1301 BENCHMARK = AVERAGED RTDs FROM 5 REPEATED FIRE TESTS = RTD_ave (H1301)

  13. ELECTRICAL ARC CORE TUBE ARRAY FUEL NOZZLES UP FWD 2” TALL FLAME STABILIZATION RIB AIRFLOW STA 502  STA 512 IMAGERY - SPRAY FIRE ZONE

  14. UP AIRFLOW FWD STA 503 IMAGERY - POOL FIRE ZONE

  15. EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY – Pt I, MASS • PROCESS • SELECT CONDITIONS FROM 1 OF 4 EQUIVALENCE ITERATIONS • HiVent, JP8 SPRAY OR POOL FIRE THREAT • LoVent, LUBRICANT SPRAY OR JP8 POOL FIRE THREAT • ESTABLISH H1301 BENCHMARK WITH 5 REPEATED FIRE TESTS • FIND EQUIVALENT MASS OF THE REPLACEMENT CANDIDATE • COMPARISION BASIS : AVERAGE RTD OF 5 REPEATED TESTS • EQUIVALENCE DEFINED AS : RTD_ave (H1301)  RTD_ave (EQUIVALENT MASS) • IF A SPRAY FIRE THREAT, USE EQUIVALENT MASS AND VERIFY SUCCESS AGAINST OTHER FUELS • HiVent VERIFICATION – LUBRICANT & HYDRAULIC FLUID • LoVent VERIFICATION – JP8 • REPEAT 3 TESTS FOR EACH FUEL • SUCCESS DEFINED AS : RTD_ave (EQUIVALENT MASS)  RTD_ave (VERIFICATION)

  16. EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY – Pt II, CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY, PART II ~ CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENCE ~

  17. EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY – Pt II, CONCENTRATION • TREATING THE VOLUMETRIC GAS CONCENTRATION AS THE PAREMETER FOR EQUIVALENCE (NOT CITING ANY MASS EQUIVALENCE!!) • REPLACEMENT CANDIDATE IS DELIVERED THROUGH NON-OPTIMIZED PLUMBING • SOME NON-OPTIMIZED QUANTITY OF THE REPLACEMENT CANDIDATE WILL STILL ACHIEVE PARITY WITH H1301 BENCHMARK • CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENCE EVALUATED AT THE FLAME FRONT ONLY (2 CHANNELS PER TEST)!! • EQUIVALENT GAS CONCENTRATION IS BASED ON : • CAPTURED GAS ANALYSIS DATA • FIRE EXTINCTION BEHAVIOR

  18. EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY – Pt II, CONCENTRATION • PROCESS • CAPTURE GAS DISTRIBUTION OF THE EQUIVALENT MASS WITH 3 REPEATED TESTS • COLLECT THE 2 FLAME FRONT CURVES FOR EACH TEST • TRANSFORM FLAME FRONT, GAS CONCENTRATION CURVES • CURVES ARE TYPICALLY CAPTURED TO ILLUSTRATE EXPONENTIAL GROWTH/DECAY (i.e. CERTIFICATION TEST) • TRANSFORM EACH CURVE TO CONCENTRATION vs. DURATION@CONCENTRATION • CREATE A SINGLE DATA POOL OF ALL POINTS FROM THE TRANSFORMED CURVES • MODEL THE DATA POOL WITH HIGHEST-ORDER POLYNOMIAL, BEST-FIT FUNCTION • RECALL AVERAGE RTD FROM REPLACEMENT CANDIDATE • USE AVERAGE RTD OF THE EQUIVALENT MASS IN THE BEST-FIT FUNCTION TO CALCULATE EQUIVALENT CONCENTRATION

  19. EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY – EXAMPLE EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY ~ EXAMPLE ~

  20. EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY – Pt I, EXAMPLE • MASS EQUIVALENCE EXAMPLE (actual data) • EQUIVALENCE ITERATION = HiVent JP8 SPRAY FIRE • H1301 BENCHMARK = RTD_ave (H1301) = 1.39 SECONDS • REPLACEMENT CANDIDATE WORK WITH HFC-125 • EQUIVALENT MASS = 8.0 LBF HFC-125

  21. EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY – Pt II, EXAMPLE • EQUIVALENT CONCENTRATION EXAMPLE • THIS EXAMPLE IS BASED UPON DATA FOR THE DISTRIBUTION OF 8.0 LBF HFC-125 • RESTRICT DATA REVIEW TO THE 2 ANALYZER CHANNELS LOCATED AT THE SPRAY FLAME FRONT • CALCULATION FOLLOWS IN GRAPHICAL FORMAT • FOR SIMPLICITY IN THIS EXAMPLE : • ONE PAIR OF ANALYZER TRACES ARE SHOWN (SINGLE TEST) • DUE TO THE REDUCED SIZE OF THE DATA POOL, THE CALCULATION FOR THIS EXAMPLE IS NOT THE REPORTED EQUIVALENT CONCENTRATION • PROTOCOL REQUIRES REPEATING 3 GAS DISTRIBUTION TESTS TO PRODUCE THE DATA POOL TO MAKE THIS CALCULATION

  22. EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY – Pt II, EXAMPLE

  23. EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY – Pt II, EXAMPLE ILLUSTRATION ONLY ~ EQUIVALENCE NOT VALID ~

  24. RESULTS TO DATE RESULTS TO DATE

  25. RESULTS TO DATE - TABULAR

  26. RESULTS TO DATE – TRANSFORMED DATA, HiVent EQUIVALENTS

  27. CONCLUSORY STATEMENTS SUMMARY/STATUS

  28. CONCLUSORY STATEMENTS • CURRENTLY WORKING HFC-125 IN THE LoVent JP8 POOL • REMAINING CF3I EQUIVALENCE ITERATIONS WILL FOLLOW • UPON COMPLETING HFC-125/CF3I ITERATIONS, PROJECT CONCLUDES

More Related