180 likes | 294 Vues
This work explores the unique definition of risk aversion and how it is influenced by multiple correlated risks. The study delves into various attitudes towards single and multi-attributive risks, as presented by Dorfleitner and Krapp (2007), highlighting the limited research in behavioral responses to multiple risks. It discusses the violation of marginality assumptions in utility functions and examines correlation aversion in both monetary and non-monetary contexts. The findings present implications for understanding vulnerability and the effectiveness of policies aimed at reducing risk, particularly in areas like food insecurity.
E N D
AnkeLeroux To people,multiple risks matter!
Unique definition of risk aversion • Good understanding of human behaviour when exposed to single risky prospect Single risk
Multi-attributive risk attitude defined in several ways (Dorfleitner and Krapp 2007) • Few studies of behaviour under multiple risks: correlation of risks matters • Marginality assumption violated in additively separable multi-attribute utility functions (von Winterfeldt 1980) • Correlation aversion over ‘money now’ versus ‘money later’(Andersen et al. 2011) • Correlation aversion over non-monetary risky outcomes (Gangadharan, Harrison, Leroux, Raschky, preliminary) Multiple risks
People are averse to risks being correlated above and beyond their attitude towards individual risk Experimental evidence
People are averse to risks being correlated above and beyond their attitude towards individual risk How may this help us understand vulnerability?
IC Nutritional Intake
IC P[food insecure] Nutritional Intake
IC P[food insecure] Nutritional Intake
IC P[food insecure] Nutritional Intake
IC P[food insecure] Nutritional Intake
IC ? P[food insecure] Nutritional Intake
More research needed! • Uptake of policies designed to reduce vulnerability • Insurance Implications?