1 / 46

Project Plan

Project Plan. MARS. Medical Application Radiology System. Presentation Outline. Company Introduction Business Analysis Recommended Solution Project Approach Product Demo T.A.C. Benefits vs. Costs Future Business Enhancements Lessons Learned. Elite Technology Consultants.

yetty
Télécharger la présentation

Project Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project Plan MARS Medical Application Radiology System

  2. Presentation Outline Company Introduction Business Analysis Recommended Solution Project Approach Product Demo T.A.C. Benefits vs. Costs Future Business Enhancements Lessons Learned

  3. Elite Technology Consultants • Deen Babayale • Caitlyn Craft • Steve Dansby • Monica Haaksma • David Preza • Archie Tang DeenBabayale – Systems Analyst Caitlyn Craft – Quality Control Manager Steve Dansby – Assistant Project Manager Monica Haaksma – Project Manager David Preza – Software Developer Archie Tang – Business Analyst

  4. About ET • Mission: • Quality consulting • Improve efficiency • Achieve business objectives • Provide measurable results • Ease-of-use and reliable training • Superior customer service and satisfaction

  5. Company Introduction This section will introduce your company, your vision and your services.

  6. Texas Cardiology Association of Houston Ronald Artis • Nuclear Medicine Technician • Administer Radioactive Drugs • Track • Imaging Amount in Patient • Diagnostic Imaging

  7. Organizational Time Line Texas Cardiology Associates of Houston was established TCA began working with Elite Technology TCA began construction on new clinic building TCA moved into new clinic Jan. 1988 Feb. 2004 Aug. 2006 Aug. 2010

  8. Business Analysis This section will focus on how we dug into the issues that the Texas Cardiologists Associates were concerned with.

  9. How We Conduct Analysis • Review Historical Data • Observe Current Procedures • Understand Business Processes • Face- to- Face Client Analysis

  10. Business Rules • Provide Recommended Stress Tests • Stress Tests Prices are an avg. $4,000.00 each • Open M-F 8am to 5pm • Patients are seen systematically • All Patients Appointment Based • Doctors must be on-site • Stress Test Types • Dobutamine(chemical) • Bruce Stress Test(physical)

  11. Current Business Process

  12. Current Business Process (cont…)

  13. Manual Process Samples QC Camera Flood Bars Aro Daily Survey Report Issues Log Binder

  14. System Objectives The general company objectives are as follows: Track radiation contamination levels Perform Patient Stress Tests Access accurate data in a timely manner Edit and Implement Important Data Track Dobutamine injections with corresponding patient information, Enforce state regulations regarding quality control reports

  15. Performance Comparison

  16. Performance Goals

  17. T.C.A. Likes Vs. Dislikes Vs. Here we have identified what T.C.A. Houston is satisfied with and what processes they feel need improvement.

  18. Interview Results: Company Impacts Impacts Problems

  19. Estimated Process Impact Resolutions & Proposed Issue Resolutions • Improved Wait Time Efficiency • Improved Data Storage • Computerized Quality Control Reporting • Reliable Calculation of Dobutamine injections Proposed Positive Impacts • Due to improved clinic data organization, more time can be spent with the patient and core nuclear medicine technologist activities • Due to improved record keeping and multiple backups, the company will be able to comply with state obligations • Less data redundancy problems and high data accuracy • Ability to correctly calculate the amount of imaging agent based on patient’s weight

  20. The Financial Impact This section will focus on how our proposed resolution to T.C.A. Houston’s problem will have a monetary impact on the business.

  21. Financial Impact Long Patient Wait Scheduling opportunity to add 1 patient, or $4,000, monthly Data Storage Ability to avoid state compliance fines up to $23,000 a year

  22. Financial Impact Cont. Manual Reports Reduce report processing time saving 27 minutes, or $17.73, a day Manual Calculations Reduce Dobutamine calculation time by 4 minutes, or $2.60, per patient

  23. Costs of Current System

  24. Total Cost of Ownership MARS

  25. Percent of Total Cost

  26. Break-Even Analysis

  27. Yearly Financial Gain TCA’s Yearly Financial Gain: $81,018

  28. Recommended Solution This section will cover the solution E.T. has formulated to address T.A.C. Houston’s issues

  29. Requirements

  30. Requirements

  31. Requirements (cont…)

  32. Requirement Summary Monitor Overall levels of Dobutamine in clinic Track well counter history Track Dobutamine amount administered to patients Report generation

  33. Project Approach This section will cover the approach E.T. will take towards solving the issues at hand.

  34. High Level Project Approach

  35. Our Finished Application This section will cover the complete web application we have constructed for T.A.C. Houston.

  36. Explore M.A.R.S. We will now give a comprehensive preview of how our application is to work.

  37. Project Improvements This section will cover future improvements for the MARS system.

  38. Future Enhancements

  39. Lessons Learned This section will cover the lessons that were learned by Elite Technology.

  40. Application Development

  41. What Did We Discover? Google is your friend!!! Development Issues Reporting Sample Documents M.D. Anderson Library Many programming resources available

  42. What Didn’t Work?

  43. What Would We Do Differently?

  44. Summary This section will summarize the presentation.

  45. Summary

  46. Questions

More Related