1 / 41

Solar Power Source for Sensors

Solar Power Source for Sensors. Group 10 Steven Portscheller Pavlina Akritas & Gunjan Tejani ECE 445 Senior Design April 28, 2006. Introduction . Solar panel and battery system provide independent power source for a wireless sensor node

yuma
Télécharger la présentation

Solar Power Source for Sensors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Solar Power Source for Sensors Group 10 Steven Portscheller Pavlina Akritas & Gunjan Tejani ECE 445 Senior Design April 28, 2006

  2. Introduction • Solar panel and battery system provide independent power source for a wireless sensor node • Utilizes peak power tracking to extract the maximum power from the solar panel under variable conditions (sunlight, load) • Provides a regulated 3.3 Volts independent of a power grid

  3. Objectives • Provide approximately 30-50 mW at 3.3 V • Small size • Implement maximum peak power tracking on the solar panel • Monitor battery charge status

  4. Overall Design

  5. Initial Idea • Constant Voltage Fraction • Voltage at which peak power occurs is a constant fraction of open circuit voltage under given light conditions • Not necessary to measure current • Model based design (non adaptable) • Dependant on accuracy of preproduction testing

  6. Challenges • Hard to search for PV’s that are small. • Power Film 3.6 V, 50 mA Flexible Solar Panel MPT3.6-75 by Sundance Solar with size 2.9" X 3“.

  7. Testing • Solar panel tests to determine peak power voltage constant k

  8. Testing cont. • BUT, the current is too low, therefore the resulting power was low.

  9. Challenges Overcame • Final PV used, Edmund Scientific item #3039811 with specifications of 0.45 V, 800 mA and size of 33/4" x 29/16" x 1/4“. • Given the low , used 6 PV’s in series. • is never reached so model would work.

  10. Temperature Test Results • When cooled increases (from 2.870 V to 3.035 V) • When heated decreases (from 2.837 V to 2.685 V) • Possible reasons include the solar insolation, different ambient temperatures, electrons and holes • Another possible reason could be the internal cell diode

  11. Typical Test Results • Temperature results: • When cooled increases (from 2.870 V to 3.035 V) • When heated decreases (from 2.837 V to 2.685 V) • V versus I, variation throughout a day

  12. Voc throughout a day

  13. Changing ideas • Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) based on measuring voltage and current and calculating power • Operating points kept at knee of the PV I-V curves. • Adaptable.

  14. Power Tracking Hardware • Dc/dc converter with large (1 F) capacitor • Current sense amplifier and sense resistor • PIC to measure voltage and current and enable/disable converter accordingly

  15. Dc/dc converter • Acts as voltage control for solar panel • Dc/dc converter is enabled to discharge capacitor and lower operating voltage of solar panel • Converter is disabled to allow capacitor to charge and raise operating voltage of solar panel • Boosts solar panel voltage (0 to 3.3 V) to a voltage sufficient to charge the battery

  16. Dc/dc converter • MAX1675 chosen for small size and high efficiency (up to 94 % claimed) • Cooper Bussmann PowerStor® carbon aerogel supercapacitor chosen for high energy density and low equivalent series resistance (ESR)

  17. Testing • Testing indicated an efficiency of approx. 85%

  18. Microcontroller • MSP430 used in target circuit • PIC16F876A was chosen for availability and support provided in the class (examples, etc.) • Software written in C so algorithms could be adapted

  19. Current Sense Amplifier • MAX4173 chosen for small size, low power consumption • Testing showed 20 V/V amp with 0.2 ohm sense resistor allowed measurable current range of 0.004 to 0.75 amps (approx.) • Care must be taken in choosing resistor/amp combination to prevent saturation of amplifier

  20. Testing

  21. Algorithm • Takes voltage and current readings each cycle and multiplies for power • Compares current power to previous two power readings • If three progressively lower power readings have been sensed, compares three voltage readings to determine if converter needs to be enabled or disabled

  22. Algorithm readADC_1(); //voltage readADC_2(); //current sense amplifier output tempVOLT = VOLT_2; VOLT_2 = VOLT_1; VOLT_3 = tempVOLT; VOLT_1 = ADC_1; //most recent voltage reading tempPOWER = POWER_2; POWER_2 = POWER_1; POWER_3 = tempPOWER; mult(); //POWER_1 is updated

  23. Algorithm if(POWER_2 > POWER_1) { if(POWER_3 > POWER_2 // P3 > P2 > P1 { if(VOLT_1 >= VOLT_2) { if(VOLT_2 >= VOLT_3) // V3 < V2 < V1 V rising { output_high(PIN_C0); //enable converter } } else // V2 > V1 { if(VOLT_3 > VOLT_2) //V3 > V2 > V1 V dropping { output_low(PIN_C0); //disable converter } } }

  24. Circuit

  25. Testing • Tested indoors with a lamp • Determine voltage of maximum power for the solar panel under controlled conditions • Monitor voltage on solar panel with tracking circuit implemented • Tracker would maintain an average voltage within approx. 10% of peak power voltage

  26. Testing Current Signal V*I Voltage

  27. Rechargeable Battery • Uses 3-cell 3.6V NiMH rechargeable battery with 700-mAH capacity • Features • Light weight • No memory-effect – trickle charging • Environmentally friendly – no toxic chemicals • Constant charging and discharging rates • 70% efficiency

  28. Discharge Characteristic • Discharge across various load conditions • Smaller the resistance faster the discharge • At a maximum applicable load of 50 mW plus the circuit consumption, the battery can supply up to 21 hours without charging up

  29. Bq2012 - Gas Gauge IC • Maintain accurate record of available battery charge • Monitor voltage across a sense resistor to determine charge or discharge activity • The bq2012 also estimates self-discharge, monitors the battery for low-battery voltage thresholds, and compensates for temperature and charge/discharge rates

  30. Bq2012 Features • Three ways to communicate with the gas gauge IC • EMPTY output • LED display • DQ serial I/O communication function

  31. Serial Communication • Transmit bits 03hex to read NACH register and receive bits for currently stored charge capacity in the battery • Using two available pins on the controller • Shut-off - 20% of the charge capacity remains

  32. Serial Communication

  33. Switching Regulator • Buck-boost dc/dc converter operation • Takes the input from the positive battery terminal, which is connected to the dc/dc converter MAX1675 • Higher efficiency than the linear regulator • Fixed 3.3 V output at a maximum of 1300 mA output current capacity TPS61131PW

  34. Load and Input Variation • Output voltage (Ch 1) sweep across resistance 200 ohms and 1000 ohms at a constant input voltage of 3.6V • Output voltage (Ch 1) for variation in input voltage from 2.0 V to 4.5V (Ch 2)

  35. Regulator Efficiency • Efficiency increases as the input voltage increases as well as the load decreases • The average efficiency is 85%

  36. PCB

  37. Overall Design

  38. Conclusions • Need to maintain voltage greater than nominal battery voltage in order to prevent back current and associated losses • Probably necessary to design a dc/dc converter instead of using off the shelf design • Circuit still provides necessary power, but peak power tracking did not appear to offer significant gains

  39. Experience Gained • Solar panel characteristics • MPPT algorithms • PIC programming • Battery monitoring and charge tracking • Serial communication • Low voltage power systems • PCB design and fabrication

  40. Cost Analysis

  41. Credits • Dwayne Hagerman • Prof. Scott Carney • Joel Jordan • Jonathan Kimball • Sriram Narayanan • Machine and Part Shop Staff

More Related