1 / 9

Enhancing Student Engagement in Research and Evaluation: Best Practices and Pitfalls

This collaborative exploration by Kerry Dobbins and Rebecca Freeman discusses effective strategies for fostering student engagement in research and evaluation. It covers various methods such as surveys, focus groups, and shared events that promote active participation. The presenters highlight key factors for successful engagement, including membership, influence, and fulfilling individual needs. Additionally, they address common pitfalls and factors that hinder engagement, encouraging thoughtful discussion on solutions to enhance student involvement in academic research.

yuri
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing Student Engagement in Research and Evaluation: Best Practices and Pitfalls

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Collaborative Exploration of the Do’s and Don’ts for Student Engagement in Research and EvaluationKerry DobbinsRebecca Freeman

  2. Talk about… • Some ways you have engaged students in research and evaluation • Identify some things that you feel engaged in • What makes you feel like you’re engaged?

  3. Kerry Surveys, focus groups School governor When your voice matters Rebecca Surveys, NGT consultations Student L&T Network Shared events Surveys Governor Social events Rob Module evaluations Football team Social events

  4. Conditions for Engagement • Membership • Influence • Fulfilment of individual needs • Shared events and emotional connections McMillan and Chavis (1986)

  5. Your turn… • Think of an example that hasn’t worked • What are some of the reasons you think it wasn’t successful? • Membership • Influence • Fulfilment of individual needs • Shared events and emotional connections

  6. Snakes and Ladders

  7. Things that might hinder student engagement in research and evaluation Positive things you can do to support student engagement in research and evaluation

  8. Rebecca.Freeman@bcu.ac.ukKerry.Dobbins@bcu.ac.uk

More Related