80 likes | 204 Vues
This discussion explores the ethical dilemma of hiring a best friend over a more qualified candidate. It delves into personal values and workplace dynamics, prompting reflection on loyalty versus professional judgement. The second part examines historical political candidates, focusing on the 1920s election where Republicans favored Warren Harding and Democrats backed James M. Cox. Notable aspects include Harding's military experience, links to the Teapot Dome scandal, and the rise of Calvin Coolidge's leadership. This analysis highlights the complexities of voter decision-making.
E N D
Bell Ringer: • Would you hire your best friend for a job even if they weren’t the best candidate? Explain.
Who would you vote for? Candidate # 1 Candidate # 2 • Popular • Supports Immigration restrictions • Not a gifted leader • Has Military experience • Relatively unknown • Focuses on foreign policy
Republicans chose: Warren Harding Democrats chose: James M. Cox
Albert Fall:Secretary of Interior What does the Sec. of Interior do? Involved in the Teapot Dome Scandal (Illegal renting of Naval Oil Reserves) Fined $100,ooo and sent to jail for a year
Calvin Coolidge Helped restore the publics trust in the republican party Fired members of the Ohio Gang Continued economic growth in the U.S. - Easily wins 1924 election
Herbert Hoover In 1928, Coolidge decides not to run for office Republican candidate Herbert Hoover wins the Election (over Alfred Smith) His campaign slogan was “A Chicken in every pot. A car in every garage.”