Journal Watch
200 likes | 305 Vues
Explore the correlation between emotional stress and breathlessness in asthma patients. This study examines respiratory muscle activity during various tasks to understand how mental state influences breathing patterns.
Journal Watch
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Journal Watch Jeffrey P Schaefer, MD May 8, 2007
Background • we believe that body organs respond to emotional state • asthma patients may experience ‘stress-associated breathlessness’ without increased airway obstruction • mental state may alter measurements of breathing
Objectives • strained breathing may trigger breathlessness in asthma patients • asthma patents will feel more breathless with the same breathing pattern or with a stress induced breathing pattern
Methods • ‘Study of Harm’ • normals: exposure ? ‘disease’ • asthma: exposure ? ‘disease’ • Exposure arithmetic task • Disease altered breathing • breathlessness
Patients • Well Children 9-13 years (7) • Children with Asthma 9-14 yr (8) • stable disease and free of infx x 1 mo • FEV1 > 70% of predicted • continue inhaled corticosteroid • STOP bronchodilator x 24 hr • informed consent
Measurements • magnetometer respiration band • electromyography electrodes • Borg breathlessness scale
Timing of Resp Muscle Activity • Phase Angle • maximum EMG should occur at maximum chest expansion • at baseline: • asthmatic children • reduce EMG activity earlier in inspiration • tend to have abdominal strain in inspiration whereas normal have abdominal strain in expiration • these effects diminish during arithmetic (distracted)
‘phase reversal’ with math*A & B* chest expansionC & D* frontal diaphragm EMG
Author’s remarks • asthmatic children tend to ‘control their breathing’ possibly to reduce turbulent airflow / irritation • breathing became ‘closer to normal’ during arithmetic • WHY? • distraction probably not • interaction between CNS and breathing in the setting of disability?
Are the results of the study valid? • comparison groups similar except for factor under consideration? • similar measurements in both groups? • follow-up sufficient? • temporal relationship correct? • dose response gradient? • What are the results? • association between exposure and outcome? • precision of risk estimate? • Will the results help me in caring for my patients? • applicable to my practice? • magnitude of the risk? • stop the exposure?