1 / 32

Trends in Educational Achievement:

Trends in Educational Achievement: An International, National and Local Comparison of Student Performance. Where We Stand Internationally. Where We Stand Internationally. Where we Stand Internationally. Racial Achievement Gap. Racial Achievement Gap. Racial Achievement Gap.

addo
Télécharger la présentation

Trends in Educational Achievement:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Trends in Educational Achievement: An International, National and Local Comparison of Student Performance

  2. Where We Stand Internationally

  3. Where We Stand Internationally

  4. Where we Stand Internationally

  5. Racial Achievement Gap

  6. Racial Achievement Gap

  7. Racial Achievement Gap

  8. Racial Achievement Gap

  9. Income Achievement Gap

  10. Intersection of Race and Poverty

  11. Intersection of Race and Poverty

  12. What makes a difference?

  13. Multi-County Comparisons of Reading AYP, 2007-2008 % Achieving Proficiency, by race

  14. Multi-County Comparisons of Reading AYP, 2007-2008 % Achieving Proficiency, by social factor

  15. Multi-County Comparison of 2008 SAT Scores* Average total (2400 max) Average Reading + Math (1600 max) *Effective fall 2007, the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) was expanded to include a writing section. Each of the three sections can now receive a maximum score of 800 points, making possible a total score of 2400 on all three sections.

  16. Multi-County Comparison % students taking SAT, 2008

  17. CMS EOG Math Result 2006-09 % Level III/IV, by race

  18. CMS EOG Math Result 2006-08 % Level III/IV, by social factor

  19. 2007-08 Multi-County Comparison,Graduation Rates by Gender

  20. 2007-08 Multi-County Comparison,Graduation Rates by Social Factor

  21. 2007-08 Multi-County Comparison,Graduation Rates by Race

  22. CMS Math Scores - 2009

  23. CMS Math Gap Trends

  24. CMS Reading Scores - 2009

  25. CMS Reading Gap Trends

  26. CMS Science Scores - 2009

  27. CMS Science Gap Trends

  28. REFERENCES • 1. CMS Department of Instructional Accountability • http://pmd.cms.k12.nc.us/School%20Performance/Schools/Profile.aspx • 2. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction • http://ayp.ncpublicschools.org/2008/app/leaimp/Detail.cgi • 3. iesNational Center for Education Statistics • http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d07/tables/dt07_100.asp • 4. McKinsey & Company Social Sector Office • http://mckinsey.com/clientservice/socialsector/achievementgap.asp • 5. Multi-County Comparison of Students Taking SAT • http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/newsroom/news/2008-09/0826/sat-performance.pdf • 6. Education Resource Strategies: “Rethinking Resources for Student Success,” January 27, 2009

More Related