1 / 38

Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District

Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District. Local Control Funding Formula October 2013. Local Control Funding Formula. Old revenue system Was not tied to student demographics Was largely state-controlled Lacked appropriate accountability measures. Local Control Funding Formula.

amanda-cherry
Télécharger la présentation

Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cutler-Orosi Joint UnifiedSchool District Local Control Funding Formula October 2013

  2. Local Control Funding Formula • Old revenue system • Was not tied to student demographics • Was largely state-controlled • Lacked appropriate accountability measures.

  3. Local Control Funding Formula • Three critical components of weighted student formula: • Students living in poverty • Students who are English Language Learners • Additional funding if there is a concentration of needy students. Tipping point is 55% of population

  4. Local Control Funding FormulaEnglish Language Learners

  5. Local Control Funding FormulaStudents Living in Poverty

  6. Local Control Funding Formula • Plan is anticipated to be implemented over several years (eight years is based on current estimates). State economy may dictate a longer implementation period. • Target for “Full Implementation” has been determined for each California school district and charter school. • Combines Revenue Limit and 42 Categoricals into one revenue stream.

  7. Most State Categorical Programs Rolled into LCFF • Remaining State Categoricals include: • Special Education • After School Education & Safety • Lottery • Quality Education and Investment Act • Child Nutrition • Preschool • Add-ons to LCFF include: • Transportation • Targeted Instruction Improvement Block Grant • State Categoricals rolled into LCFF: • Economic Impact Aid • All Tier III Categoricals, including: • Instructional Materials • Arts and Music BG • School and Library Improvement BG • Gifted and Talented Education • Deferred Maintenance

  8. Local Control Funding Formula for COJUSD in Target Year 2021 • Base Grant has differences in Grade Spans • K-3 Funding: $6,952 per ADA • Grades 4-6: $7,056 per ADA • Grades 7-8: $7,266 per ADA • Grades 9-12: $8,419 per ADA

  9. Local Control Funding Formula for COJUSD Provides “Add-On” for additional programs • $723 additional in Grades K-3 for class-size reduction • $219 additional in Grades 9-12 for career tech ed.

  10. Local Control Funding Formula for COJUSD- Target Provides a Supplemental and Concentration Grant for disadvantaged students- 56% and over. • K – 3 $6,952 S= $1,228 C = $959 • 4 – 6 $7,056 S= $1,129 C = $882 • 7 – 8 $7,266 S= $1,163 C = $908 • 9 – 12 $8,419 S= $1,382 C =$1,080 Targets are increased each year by COLA (1.565% in 2013-14).

  11. Local Control Funding FormulaTarget for 2021

  12. Local Control Funding FormulaTarget for 2021

  13. Implementation of LCFF After Eight Years of Implementation FULL IMPLEMENTATION IN 2021- OUR 2007 FUNDING LEVEL- $40,101,574 2013 – 14 LCFF Transitional Funding $28,216,065

  14. LOCAL CONTROL=LOCAL ACCOUNTABILITY • All expenditures have to be tied to an area of State Priority • Local control does not extend to making decisions about how to spend money • Stakeholders decide how to spend money within the State’s areas of priority • District decides smart goals with annual reports to Board and County each year

  15. AccountabilityLocal Control and Accountability Plan Student Engagement Other Student Outcomes Student Achievement School Climate Areas of State Priority Parental Involvement Basic Services (Williams) Access to a Broad Curriculum Common Core State Standards

  16. Accountability Local Control and Accountability Plan Student Engagement School Attendance Rates Chronic Absenteeism Rates High School Graduation Rates High School Dropout Rates Middle School Dropout Rates

  17. Accountability Local Control and Accountability Plan Student Achievement

  18. Accountability Local Control and Accountability Plan Student Achievement Performance on Standardized Tests Score on Academic Performance Index % of Students that are College and Career Ready % of ELs that become English proficient English Learner Reclassification Rate % of Students that pass AP Exams with 3 or better % of students prepared for college by the EAP

  19. Accountability Local Control and Accountability Plan School Climate

  20. Accountability Local Control and Accountability Plan School Climate Student Suspension Rates Student Expulsion Rates Other Local Measures

  21. Accountability Local Control and Accountability Plan Basic Services (Williams)

  22. Accountability Local Control and Accountability Plan Basic Services (Williams) Rate of Teacher Misassignment Student Access to Standards-Aligned Instructional Materials Facilities in Good Repair

  23. Accountability Local Control and Accountability Plan Common Core State Standards

  24. Accountability Local Control and Accountability Plan Common Core State Standards Implementation of CCSS for all students, including EL

  25. Accountability Local Control and Accountability Plan Access to a Broad Curriculum

  26. Accountability Local Control and Accountability Plan Access to a Broad Curriculum Student access and enrollment in all required areas of study

  27. Accountability Local Control and Accountability Plan Parental Involvement

  28. Accountability Local Control and Accountability Plan Parental Involvement Efforts to seek parent input Promotion of parental participation

  29. Accountability Local Control and Accountability Plan Other Student Outcomes

  30. Accountability Local Control and Accountability Plan Other Student Outcomes Other indicators of student performance in required areas of study. May include performance on other exams.

  31. AccountabilityLocal Control and Accountability Plan Student Engagement Other Student Outcomes Student Achievement School Climate Areas of State Priority Parental Involvement Basic Services (Williams) Access to a Broad Curriculum Common Core State Standards

  32. Steps in Adopting and Updating the LCAP

  33. Steps in Adopting and Updating the LCAP

  34. Steps in Adopting and Updating the LCAP

  35. Steps in Adopting and Updating the LCAP

  36. Steps in Adopting and Updating the LCAP

  37. Cautions about LCFF • Funding for the LCFF beyond seven years is uncertain • Sales Tax component of Prop 30 is for 4 years • Income Tax component of Prop 30 is for 7 years • There is no requirement for the State to fund the LCFF in any specific time frame. • The economy runs in cycles. It is unlikely that California will have 11 consecutive years of “recovery”

  38. Summary of LCFF • Will provide an additional $1,587,070 in funding to COJUSD in 2013 – 2014 • Full implementation will take eight or more years • More flexibility in use of funds • More accountability to local stakeholders

More Related