1 / 10

BWINDI IMPENETRABLE NATIONAL PARK- WHS

BWINDI IMPENETRABLE NATIONAL PARK- WHS. A thematic example of good management practices. Background. Gazetted in 1991 as a National Park 320 sq km Was formerly a forest reserve where communities were allowed to access resources without any form of deterrent Was inscribed a WHS in 1994

amy-downs
Télécharger la présentation

BWINDI IMPENETRABLE NATIONAL PARK- WHS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BWINDI IMPENETRABLE NATIONAL PARK- WHS A thematic example of good management practices

  2. Background • Gazetted in 1991 as a National Park • 320 sq km • Was formerly a forest reserve where communities were allowed to access resources without any form of deterrent • Was inscribed a WHS in 1994 • Its gazettement met a lot of resistance from the communities • The boundary had no buffer zone

  3. Bwindi • Bwindi is the Home to the Mountain gorilla – currently about 340 individuals • Hot spot for biodiversity conservation within the Great Albertine Rift which presents itself as the intersection between the DRC tropical forests and the East African Savannah vegetation • Pleistocene refugia

  4. Threats at the time of Inscription • Poaching and massive killing of wildlife including the critically endangered Mountain gorilla • Habitat degradation through timber harvesting and encroachment • Population pressure • Disease to the Mountain gorilla; e.g. scabies • Negative attitudes towards creation of the area as Park • Lack of adequate resources to support management • Invasive • Demand for road construction through the very sensitive part of the park • Unclear boundary to communities and staff • No guidelines were in place to support management – GMP, AOP • Inappropriate Law which did not recognise the roles for the community

  5. Efforts in maintaining the site • Marking of boundaries to ensure that they are very clear to all community members • Compensation of all community encroachers who left the PA • Involvement of communities in fighting poaching – Gorilla trafficking and other forms of wildlife protection • Change of community attitudes through community conservation strategies – poaching, land acquisition, law enforcement, • Introduction of tourism initiatives that put the communities at the fore front • Involvement of other partners – CARE, IGCP, MGVP, Local Government, CTPH, ICCN, ITFC, BMCT, UNESCO • Sharing of benefits from the proceeds of the PA – 20% of entry fee, US $5 as gorilla permit levy, sustainable harvest of NTP • General management planning – involvement of all stakeholders • Annual Operations planning – • Employment of locals • Recognition of the indigenous people’s (Batwa) needs to have access to NTPs • Securing of buffer areas for staff infrastructure developments • Staff capacity building in monitoring and conservation generally

  6. Employment Employment

  7. Ecotourism • Proximity to PAs allows community ecotourism initiatives

  8. Revenue Sharing

  9. Challenges • Global Climate change • Transboundary movements of the mountain gorilla • Developments next to the PA • Crop raiding by the gorilla • Closing forest habitat • Poaching • Isolation and gene pool building • Introduction of exotic plants • Need for more research/ support to studies that will inform management

  10. Thank You

More Related