1 / 30

Predation

Predation. Competition (intra- and inter-) involve interactions between same trophic level Predation involves interactions between trophic levels One species negatively effects the other Very important for management goals Conservation Control Harvesting. Types of predation. Herbivory

arutledge
Télécharger la présentation

Predation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Predation • Competition (intra- and inter-) involve interactions between same trophic level • Predation involves interactions between trophic levels • One species negatively effects the other • Very important for management goals • Conservation • Control • Harvesting

  2. Types of predation • Herbivory • Animals prey on green plants • Death of plant not usual • Parasitism • Usually don’t kill host • Carnivory • Predator kills and eats prey • Cannibalism • Predator and prey same species

  3. Predator behavior and prey survival • Herbivores gain nutrition from plants • Have to deal with plant defenses • chemical and physical • Must also avoid predators • Protective shapes and coloration • Active defense • Alertness and swiftness • Protective cover • morphology • Predators must catch prey • Speed, agility, claws, teeth, smell, vision, etc

  4. Predation • Many different techniques • Normally involves large investment of time and effort per unit food • Usually target physically weakened or in a vulnerable place • Typically 4.5 to 10.8 % capture success • e.g. 124 moose, 7% success rate by wolves

  5. Predation • Often select prey by oddity • Color • Behavior • Location

  6. Predation • Conspicuousness and crypsis

  7. Predation • Conspicuousness and crypsis • Prey change behavior in absence of predators

  8. Predation • Conspicuousness and crypsis • Prey change behavior in absence of predators • Marginal habitat

  9. Effect of predators on prey density

  10. Effect of predators on prey density • Predator numbers also correlated with prey numbers • Based on correlations • Are predators keeping prey below food supply, or killing only those that are malnourished? • Need to understand the behavior of predators

  11. The behavior of predators How do predators respond to: • Changes in prey density? • Changes in predator density? • Differences in the degree of clumping of prey?

  12. Response to changes in prey density Response of predators to prey depends on: • Feeding behavior of individual predators • Functional response • Response of the predator population through reproduction, immigration and emigration • Numerical response

  13. Functional response • Searches randomly for its prey • Has an unlimited appetite • Spends a constant amount of time searching • Then the number of prey found will increase in direct proportion to prey density • Type I response Percent of Prey Population Eaten Number of Prey Eaten Per Predator Prey Density Prey Density

  14. Functional Response • Assumptions are usually unrealistic • Some predators show an approximation of a type 1 function response • Reindeer feeding on lichens • No animal has an unlimited appetite. • Constant search time unlikely • Handling time – more prey eaten per unit time, more time is taken up with handling and less for searching.

  15. Number of Prey Eaten Per Predator Prey Density Functional response Na = (aTtN) / (1 + ahN) • Type II response • Number eaten per time increases to an asymptote as prey density increases Percent of Prey Population Eaten Prey Density

  16. Percent of Prey Population Eaten Prey Density Functional response • Type III response • Prey switching Number of Prey Eaten Per Predator Prey Density

  17. Functional response • Success at catching depends on prey density • Predators react to individuals of own species by dispersing • Territoriality • Eviction • Interference • Interference reduces the searching efficiency of the predator as predator density increases • Interference stabilizes predator numbers

  18. Functional response • Prey live in small patches of high density and low density in between • Clumped distribution • Predators concentrate on areas of high density • Predators thereby have a regulating effect on prey numbers

  19. Numerical response • Trend of predator numbers against prey numbers • Predators increase as prey density increases • Due to • Increased rate of predator reproduction when prey are abundant • Numerical response • Attraction of predators to prey aggregations • Aggregational response

  20. Numerical response • Reproduction and mortality rate of predators depends on predation rate • More prey, more energy • Predator numbers increase to an asymptote determined by interference

  21. Total response • Total number eaten = number eaten by one predator multiplied by number of predators • Can be plotted as Total response curves • Need to also incorporate recruitment rate of prey • Different types of curves indicate different types of relationships • Predators regulate prey population • Prey regulated by intraspecific competition for food • Multiple stable states

  22. Behavior of prey • How does the behavior of the prey influence predation? • Migration • Herding and spacing • Birth synchrony

  23. Migration • If a prey species can migrate beyond the range of its predators the population can escape predator regulation • Predators have slow growing young and are restricted to a small area to breed • Ungulates have precocial young that can move within a few hours • Thus predators follow food resource, predators cannot.

  24. Herding and spacing • Animals reduce risk of predation by forming groups • Group size predicted to increase with increasing predator densities • Can also leave group when most vulnerable • Leave group when give birth as predators are concentrated around herds

  25. Birth synchrony • Synchronize births to reduce predation rate • Predator swamping • Also influenced by seasonal availability of resources • Unlikely predation is cause of synchrony, but likely intensifies it.

  26. Conservation and management • Predator and prey populations usually coexist • Prey at low density by regulation • Prey at high density by intraspecific competition for food with predation depensatory • Both systems can operate in one area • Type III functional response or density-dependent numerical response • Disturbance moves from one state to other • Explains outbreaks of pest species, decline of hunted species

  27. Conservation and management • Prey population can become extinct • Type II response with no prey refuge, no alternative prey • Important in management where there are habitat changes • Which situation occurs depends on • Ability of predator to catch prey • Ability of prey to escape predation • Reproduction

More Related