Objectives • Provide faculty with easy to use tool to document academic activities and generate digital CVs • Provide administrators with web-based reporting for P&T, faculty review, accreditation
What’s been done • Consulted with campus provosts & IFC • Directed environmental scan of industry • Conducted focus groups & generated common themes • Presented findings to provosts & IFC • Conducted open forums on each campus & collected feedback • Collected additional feedback from other stakeholders such as librarians and IR. • Provide feedback to provosts & IFC • Drafted a Request for Proposals (RFP)
University of Missouri’s Current Faculty Accomplishment System (a.k.a. FAS) “Front Page” Courses Publications
Environmental Scan • Institutional status • We are not alone in this need • Examples of commercial apps • Activity Insight by Digital Measures • Faculty 180 by Data 180 • Research in View by Thomson Reuters • Pricing structures vary • By FTE or by unit
Focus Groups • Conducted two per campus • faculty and administrative • Discussed current state of FAS • likes and dislikes • Generated common themes • FAS Focus Group Themes • Moving forward • wants, needs and concerns
Customization & the User Interface • Doesn’t fit faculty who do clinical teaching and community service. • Our faculty experience frustrationfrom having to choose from fields that are not intuitive and/or applicable. • We have someone in our office who does the data entry for our CVs because the user interface is so unfriendly. • Data entry was time consuming and slow. • There would be a value to have a system that could be customized to fit each department/division/unit.
Accountability • What is the purpose? • Who sees this data? • Why do we need a system-wide solution? • Does anyone at System/Jeff City look at this data? • Our department has not accessed FAS in five or six years. • College looks at data but faculty get little feedback. • What are my incentives other than I won’t get my raise?
Functionality • The system should be able to import from internal/external databases • Musts haves include assessment, customizable, align with P&T process, annual reviews/reports, accreditation, etc. • Output to faculty web profiles. • It must generate a variety of CVs and bio-sketches. i.e. for NIH, NSF, full CV. • It should be able to function as a repository for file storage i.e. pdf, mp3, wav, doc, etc.
Baseline Needs for Faculty • Generate Digital CVs • Follow P&T workflow steps • Import Bibliographic Data • Import from External Databases • Direct feeds from UM Data • Maintain Document Repository • EndNote, Ref Manager, Zotero • Scopus, PubMed, etc. • SIS, Grants, etc. • Syllabi, Recordings, etc.
Digital Curriculum Vitae Example • Output in Word, HTML (CV, BioSketch) or PDF • Click on CV link above for a digital CV example with embedded documents • Set CV reporting range for courses or select all • Hyperlinks to take you back to your profile • Use a template or select sections desired for CV
Baseline Needs for Administrators • Customizable Reporting • Generate Ad Hoc Reports • Accrediting Reports • P&T and Annual Faculty Reviews • Course Data Reporting • Grants & Publication Information
Additional Features • Auto-Generate Web Profiles • Department/College, Programs, Organizations • Generate Bio Sketches from Preloaded Templates • NSF, NIH, USDA • Report Templates can be defined • System, Campus, College, Department
What’s left to do • Product demos with campus presentations & web feeds – Fall 2013 • Vendor selection – Fall 2013 • Phase-In Implementation – Fall 2013 & Spring 2014 • Full Implementation – Summer 2014 & Fall 2014 (timeline subject to change)